Identifying Undercompensated Groups Defined By Multiple Attributes in Risk Adjustment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.08493v2
• Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:03:36 GMT
• Title: Identifying Undercompensated Groups Defined By Multiple Attributes in Risk Adjustment
• Authors: Anna Zink and Sherri Rose
• Abstract summary: We evaluate the risk adjustment formulas used in the U.S. health insurance Marketplaces and Medicare. We find that groups with multiple chronic conditions are undercompensated in the Marketplaces risk adjustment formula. No complex groups were found to be consistently under- or overcompensated in the Medicare risk adjustment formula.
• Score: 0.09137554315375918
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Risk adjustment in health care aims to redistribute payments to insurers based on costs. However, risk adjustment formulas are known to underestimate costs for some groups of patients. This undercompensation makes these groups unprofitable to insurers and creates incentives for insurers to discriminate. We develop a machine learning method for "group importance" to identify unprofitable groups defined by multiple attributes, improving on the arbitrary nature of existing evaluations. This procedure was designed to evaluate the risk adjustment formulas used in the U.S. health insurance Marketplaces as well as Medicare. We find that a number of previously unidentified groups with multiple chronic conditions are undercompensated in the Marketplaces risk adjustment formula, while groups without chronic conditions tend to be overcompensated in the Marketplaces. The magnitude of undercompensation when defining groups with multiple attributes is larger than with single attributes. No complex groups were found to be consistently under- or overcompensated in the Medicare risk adjustment formula. Our work provides policy makers with new information on potential targets of discrimination in the health care system and a path towards more equitable health coverage.

Related papers

• Measuring and Mitigating Biases in Motor Insurance Pricing [1.2289361708127877]
  The non-life insurance sector operates within a highly competitive and tightly regulated framework. Age-based premium fairness is also mandated in certain insurance domains. In certain insurance domains, variables such as the presence of serious illnesses or disabilities are emerging as new dimensions for evaluating fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T16:34:48Z)
• Modeling the Q-Diversity in a Min-max Play Game for Robust Optimization [61.39201891894024]
  Group distributionally robust optimization (group DRO) can minimize the worst-case loss over pre-defined groups. We reformulate the group DRO framework by proposing Q-Diversity. Characterized by an interactive training mode, Q-Diversity relaxes the group identification from annotation into direct parameterization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-20T07:02:27Z)
• Evaluating COVID-19 vaccine allocation policies using Bayesian $m$-top exploration [53.122045119395594]
  We present a novel technique for evaluating vaccine allocation strategies using a multi-armed bandit framework. $m$-top exploration allows the algorithm to learn $m$ policies for which it expects the highest utility. We consider the Belgian COVID-19 epidemic using the individual-based model STRIDE, where we learn a set of vaccination policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T12:22:30Z)
• A Discussion of Discrimination and Fairness in Insurance Pricing [0.0]
  Group fairness concepts are proposed to'smooth out' the impact of protected characteristics in the calculation of insurance prices. We present a statistical model that is free of proxy discrimination, thus, unproblematic from an insurance pricing point of view. We find that the canonical price in this statistical model does not satisfy any of the three most popular group fairness axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-02T07:31:37Z)
• Empirical Characteristics of Affordable Care Act Risk Transfer Payments [7.007996517986922]
  Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), insurers cannot engage in medical underwriting and thus face perverse incentives to engage in risk selection. One ACA program intended to reduce the effects of risk selection is risk adjustment. Under a risk adjustment program, insurers with less healthy enrollees receive risk transfer payments from insurers with healthier enrollees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-03T22:44:18Z)
• Joint Multisided Exposure Fairness for Recommendation [76.75990595228666]
  This paper formalizes a family of exposure fairness metrics that model the problem jointly from the perspective of both the consumers and producers. Specifically, we consider group attributes for both types of stakeholders to identify and mitigate fairness concerns that go beyond individual users and items towards more systemic biases in recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T19:13:23Z)
• Learning Collective Action under Risk Diversity [68.88688248278102]
  We investigate the consequences of risk diversity in groups of agents learning to play collective risk dilemmas. We show that risk diversity significantly reduces overall cooperation and hinders collective target achievement. Our results highlight the need for aligning risk perceptions among agents or develop new learning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-30T18:21:21Z)
• Robust Allocations with Diversity Constraints [65.3799850959513]
  We show that the Nash Welfare rule that maximizes product of agent values is uniquely positioned to be robust when diversity constraints are introduced. We also show that the guarantees achieved by Nash Welfare are nearly optimal within a widely studied class of allocation rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-30T11:09:31Z)
• Measuring Fairness Under Unawareness of Sensitive Attributes: A Quantification-Based Approach [131.20444904674494]
  We tackle the problem of measuring group fairness under unawareness of sensitive attributes. We show that quantification approaches are particularly suited to tackle the fairness-under-unawareness problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-17T13:45:46Z)
• Towards a fairer reimbursement system for burn patients using cost-sensitive classification [0.0]
  The adoption of the Prospective Payment System (PPS) in the UK has led to the creation of Health Resource Groups (HRGs) HRGs aim to identify groups of clinically similar patients that share similar resource usage for reimbursement purposes. We propose a data-driven model and the inclusion of patient-level costing to improve homogeneity in resource usage and severity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T15:23:21Z)
• Better Together? How Externalities of Size Complicate Notions of Solidarity and Actuarial Fairness [4.94950858749529]
  Two notions of fairness might be to a) charge each individual the same price or b) charge each individual according to the cost that they bring to the pool. We show that it is possible for both groups (high and low risk) to strictly benefit by joining an insurance pool where costs are evenly split, as opposed to being in separate risk pools. We build on this by producing a pricing scheme that maximally subsidizes the high risk group, while maintaining an incentive for lower risk people to stay in the insurance pool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-27T22:55:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.