Empirical Characteristics of Affordable Care Act Risk Transfer Payments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.02372v1
• Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 22:44:18 GMT
• Title: Empirical Characteristics of Affordable Care Act Risk Transfer Payments
• Authors: Grace Guan, Mark Braverman
• Abstract summary: Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), insurers cannot engage in medical underwriting and thus face perverse incentives to engage in risk selection. One ACA program intended to reduce the effects of risk selection is risk adjustment. Under a risk adjustment program, insurers with less healthy enrollees receive risk transfer payments from insurers with healthier enrollees.
• Score: 7.007996517986922
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), insurers cannot engage in medical underwriting and thus face perverse incentives to engage in risk selection and discourage low-value patients from enrolling in their plans. One ACA program intended to reduce the effects of risk selection is risk adjustment. Under a risk adjustment program, insurers with less healthy enrollees receive risk transfer payments from insurers with healthier enrollees. Our goal is to understand the elements driving risk transfers. First, the distribution of risk transfers should be based on random health shocks, which are unpredictable events that negatively affect health status. Second, risk transfers could be influenced by factors unique to each insurer, such as certain plans attracting certain patients, the extent to which carriers engage in risk selection, and the degree of upcoding. We create a publicly available dataset using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data that includes insurer risk transfer payments, costs, and premiums for the 2014-2017 benefit years. Using this dataset, we find that the empirical distribution of risk transfer payments is not consistent with the lack of risk selection as measured by the ACA risk transfer formula. Over all states included in our dataset, at least 60% of the volume of transfers cannot be accounted for by a purely normal model. Because we find that it is very unlikely that risk transfer payments are caused solely by random shocks that reflect health events of the population, our work raises important questions about the causes of heterogeneity in risk transfers.

Related papers

• Data-Adaptive Tradeoffs among Multiple Risks in Distribution-Free Prediction [55.77015419028725]
  We develop methods that permit valid control of risk when threshold and tradeoff parameters are chosen adaptively. Our methodology supports monotone and nearly-monotone risks, but otherwise makes no distributional assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T17:28:06Z)
• RiskQ: Risk-sensitive Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Value Factorization [49.26510528455664]
  We introduce the Risk-sensitive Individual-Global-Max (RIGM) principle as a generalization of the Individual-Global-Max (IGM) and Distributional IGM (DIGM) principles. We show that RiskQ can obtain promising performance through extensive experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T07:18:36Z)
• SafeAR: Safe Algorithmic Recourse by Risk-Aware Policies [2.291948092032746]
  We present a method to compute recourse policies that consider variability in cost. We show how existing recourse desiderata can fail to capture the risk of higher costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T18:12:11Z)
• Eliciting Risk Aversion with Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Interactive Questioning [0.0]
  This paper proposes a novel framework for identifying an agent's risk aversion using interactive questioning. We prove that the agent's risk aversion can be identified as the number of questions tends to infinity, and the questions are randomly designed. Our framework has important applications in robo-advising and provides a new approach for identifying an agent's risk preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-16T15:17:57Z)
• A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous Vehicles' Riskiness [52.27309191283943]
  This paper presents a data-driven framework for assessing the risk of different AVs' behaviors. We propose the notion of counterfactual safety margin, which represents the minimum deviation from nominal behavior that could cause a collision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T09:48:08Z)
• Efficient Risk-Averse Reinforcement Learning [79.61412643761034]
  In risk-averse reinforcement learning (RL), the goal is to optimize some risk measure of the returns. We prove that under certain conditions this inevitably leads to a local-optimum barrier, and propose a soft risk mechanism to bypass it. We demonstrate improved risk aversion in maze navigation, autonomous driving, and resource allocation benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-10T19:40:52Z)
• Holdouts set for predictive model updating [0.9749560288448114]
  Updating risk scores can lead to biased risk estimates. We propose using a holdout set' - a subset of the population that does not receive interventions guided by the risk score. We prove that this approach enables total costs to grow at a rate $Oleft(N2/3right)$ for a population of size $N$, and argue that in general circumstances there is no competitive alternative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-13T18:04:00Z)
• Learning Collective Action under Risk Diversity [68.88688248278102]
  We investigate the consequences of risk diversity in groups of agents learning to play collective risk dilemmas. We show that risk diversity significantly reduces overall cooperation and hinders collective target achievement. Our results highlight the need for aligning risk perceptions among agents or develop new learning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-30T18:21:21Z)
• Identifying Undercompensated Groups Defined By Multiple Attributes in Risk Adjustment [0.09137554315375918]
  We evaluate the risk adjustment formulas used in the U.S. health insurance Marketplaces and Medicare. We find that groups with multiple chronic conditions are undercompensated in the Marketplaces risk adjustment formula. No complex groups were found to be consistently under- or overcompensated in the Medicare risk adjustment formula.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-18T13:09:13Z)
• PAC$^m$-Bayes: Narrowing the Empirical Risk Gap in the Misspecified Bayesian Regime [75.19403612525811]
  This work develops a multi-sample loss which can close the gap by spanning a trade-off between the two risks. Empirical study demonstrates improvement to the predictive distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T16:08:34Z)
• Class-Weighted Classification: Trade-offs and Robust Approaches [38.12414892326325]
  We address imbalanced classification, the problem in which a label may have low marginal probability relative to other labels. We show that particular choices of the weighting set leads to a special instance of conditional value at risk. We generalize this weighting to derive a new robust risk problem that we call heterogeneous conditional value at risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-26T16:45:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.