Algorithms and Decision-Making in the Public Sector

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.03673v2
• Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 02:33:35 GMT
• Title: Algorithms and Decision-Making in the Public Sector
• Authors: Karen Levy, Kyla Chasalow, Sarah Riley
• Abstract summary: Governments adopt, procure, and use algorithmic systems to support their functions within several contexts. We explore the social implications of municipal algorithmic systems across a variety of stages.
• Score: 0.6101839518775968
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: This article surveys the use of algorithmic systems to support decision-making in the public sector. Governments adopt, procure, and use algorithmic systems to support their functions within several contexts -- including criminal justice, education, and benefits provision -- with important consequences for accountability, privacy, social inequity, and public participation in decision-making. We explore the social implications of municipal algorithmic systems across a variety of stages, including problem formulation, technology acquisition, deployment, and evaluation. We highlight several open questions that require further empirical research.

Related papers

• A Survey of Stance Detection on Social Media: New Directions and Perspectives [50.27382951812502]
  stance detection has emerged as a crucial subfield within affective computing. Recent years have seen a surge of research interest in developing effective stance detection methods. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of stance detection techniques on social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T03:06:25Z)
• Fair Enough? A map of the current limitations of the requirements to have fair algorithms [43.609606707879365]
  We argue that there is a hiatus between what the society is demanding from Automated Decision-Making systems, and what this demand actually means in real-world scenarios. We outline the key features of such a hiatus and pinpoint a set of crucial open points that we as a society must address in order to give a concrete meaning to the increasing demand of fairness in Automated Decision-Making systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T08:44:38Z)
• Machine Unlearning: A Survey [56.79152190680552]
  A special need has arisen where, due to privacy, usability, and/or the right to be forgotten, information about some specific samples needs to be removed from a model, called machine unlearning. This emerging technology has drawn significant interest from both academics and industry due to its innovation and practicality. No study has analyzed this complex topic or compared the feasibility of existing unlearning solutions in different kinds of scenarios. The survey concludes by highlighting some of the outstanding issues with unlearning techniques, along with some feasible directions for new research opportunities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T10:18:36Z)
• Advancing Differential Privacy: Where We Are Now and Future Directions for Real-World Deployment [100.1798289103163]
  We present a detailed review of current practices and state-of-the-art methodologies in the field of differential privacy (DP) Key points and high-level contents of the article were originated from the discussions from "Differential Privacy (DP): Challenges Towards the Next Frontier" This article aims to provide a reference point for the algorithmic and design decisions within the realm of privacy, highlighting important challenges and potential research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T05:29:18Z)
• Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
  We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings. The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms. Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z)
• Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directions [119.67643184567623]
  We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past. We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized. Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z)
• Beyond Ads: Sequential Decision-Making Algorithms in Law and Public Policy [2.762239258559568]
  We explore the promises and challenges of employing sequential decision-making algorithms in law and public policy. Our main thesis is that law and public policy pose distinct methodological challenges that the machine learning community has not yet addressed. We discuss a wide range of potential applications of sequential decision-making algorithms in regulation and governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-13T17:45:21Z)
• A Framework of High-Stakes Algorithmic Decision-Making for the Public Sector Developed through a Case Study of Child-Welfare [3.739243122393041]
  We develop a cohesive framework of algorithmic decision-making adapted for the public sector. We conduct a case study of the algorithms in daily use within a child-welfare agency. We propose guidelines for the design of high-stakes algorithmic decision-making tools in the public sector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T21:24:35Z)
• A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospects [24.615500469071183]
  We focus on algorithmic recourse, which is concerned with providing explanations and recommendations to individuals who are unfavourably treated by automated decision-making systems. We perform an extensive literature review, and align the efforts of many authors by presenting unified definitions, formulations, and solutions to recourse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T15:15:34Z)
• Dimensions of Diversity in Human Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness [37.372078500394984]
  We explore how people's perceptions of procedural algorithmic fairness relate to their demographics and personal experiences. Political views and personal experience with the algorithmic decision context significantly influence perceptions about the fairness of using different features for bail decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-02T11:59:39Z)
• A machine-learning software-systems approach to capture social, regulatory, governance, and climate problems [0.0]
  It will discuss the role of an artificially-intelligent computer system as critique-based, implicit-organizational, and an inherently necessary device, deployed in synchrony with parallel governmental policy, as a genuine means of capturing nation-population in quantitative form, public contentment in societal-cooperative economic groups, regulatory proposition, and governance-effectiveness domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-23T13:00:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.