A Unified Framework for Task-Driven Data Quality Management

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05484v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 03:56:28 GMT
• Title: A Unified Framework for Task-Driven Data Quality Management
• Authors: Tianhao Wang, Yi Zeng, Ming Jin, Ruoxi Jia
• Abstract summary: High-quality data is critical to train performant Machine Learning (ML) models. Existing Data Quality Management schemes cannot satisfactorily improve ML performance. We propose a task-driven, model-agnostic DQM framework, DataSifter.
• Score: 10.092524512413831
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: High-quality data is critical to train performant Machine Learning (ML) models, highlighting the importance of Data Quality Management (DQM). Existing DQM schemes often cannot satisfactorily improve ML performance because, by design, they are oblivious to downstream ML tasks. Besides, they cannot handle various data quality issues (especially those caused by adversarial attacks) and have limited applications to only certain types of ML models. Recently, data valuation approaches (e.g., based on the Shapley value) have been leveraged to perform DQM; yet, empirical studies have observed that their performance varies considerably based on the underlying data and training process. In this paper, we propose a task-driven, multi-purpose, model-agnostic DQM framework, DataSifter, which is optimized towards a given downstream ML task, capable of effectively removing data points with various defects, and applicable to diverse models. Specifically, we formulate DQM as an optimization problem and devise a scalable algorithm to solve it. Furthermore, we propose a theoretical framework for comparing the worst-case performance of different DQM strategies. Remarkably, our results show that the popular strategy based on the Shapley value may end up choosing the worst data subset in certain practical scenarios. Our evaluation shows that DataSifter achieves and most often significantly improves the state-of-the-art performance over a wide range of DQM tasks, including backdoor, poison, noisy/mislabel data detection, data summarization, and data debiasing.

Related papers

• Training on the Benchmark Is Not All You Need [52.01920740114261]
  We propose a simple and effective data leakage detection method based on the contents of multiple-choice options. Our method is able to work under black-box conditions without access to model training data or weights. We evaluate the degree of data leakage of 31 mainstream open-source LLMs on four benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T11:09:44Z)
• Advancing Multimodal Large Language Models in Chart Question Answering with Visualization-Referenced Instruction Tuning [1.6570772838074355]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) exhibit great potential for chart question answering (CQA) Recent efforts primarily focus on scaling up training datasets through data collection and synthesis. We propose a visualization-referenced instruction tuning approach to guide the training dataset enhancement and model development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T17:04:34Z)
• How to Train Data-Efficient LLMs [56.41105687693619]
  We study data-efficient approaches for pre-training language models (LLMs) We find that Ask-LLM and Density sampling are the best methods in their respective categories. In our comparison of 19 samplers, involving hundreds of evaluation tasks and pre-training runs, we find that Ask-LLM and Density are the best methods in their respective categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T02:27:57Z)
• LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuning [64.78894228923619]
  We propose LESS, an efficient algorithm to estimate data influences and perform Low-rank gradiEnt Similarity Search for instruction data selection. We show that training on a LESS-selected 5% of the data can often outperform training on the full dataset across diverse downstream tasks. Our method goes beyond surface form cues to identify data that the necessary reasoning skills for the intended downstream application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T19:18:04Z)
• DsDm: Model-Aware Dataset Selection with Datamodels [81.01744199870043]
  Standard practice is to filter for examples that match human notions of data quality. We find that selecting according to similarity with "high quality" data sources may not increase (and can even hurt) performance compared to randomly selecting data. Our framework avoids handpicked notions of data quality, and instead models explicitly how the learning process uses train datapoints to predict on the target tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T17:22:00Z)
• Quality In / Quality Out: Assessing Data quality in an Anomaly Detection Benchmark [0.13764085113103217]
  We show that relatively minor modifications on the same benchmark dataset (UGR'16, a flow-based real-traffic dataset for anomaly detection) cause significantly more impact on model performance than the specific Machine Learning technique considered. Our findings illustrate the need to devote more attention into (automatic) data quality assessment and optimization techniques in the context of autonomous networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T12:03:12Z)
• RLBoost: Boosting Supervised Models using Deep Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  We present RLBoost, an algorithm that uses deep reinforcement learning strategies to evaluate a particular dataset and obtain a model capable of estimating the quality of any new data. The results of the article show that this model obtains better and more stable results than other state-of-the-art algorithms such as LOO, DataShapley or DVRL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T14:38:33Z)
• An Investigation of Smart Contract for Collaborative Machine Learning Model Training [3.5679973993372642]
  Collaborative machine learning (CML) has penetrated various fields in the era of big data. As the training of ML models requires a massive amount of good quality data, it is necessary to eliminate concerns about data privacy. Based on blockchain, smart contracts enable automatic execution of data preserving and validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-12T04:25:01Z)
• Model-Agnostic Multitask Fine-tuning for Few-shot Vision-Language Transfer Learning [59.38343286807997]
  We propose Model-Agnostic Multitask Fine-tuning (MAMF) for vision-language models on unseen tasks. Compared with model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML), MAMF discards the bi-level optimization and uses only first-order gradients. We show that MAMF consistently outperforms the classical fine-tuning method for few-shot transfer learning on five benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-09T17:26:53Z)
• Evaluating model-based planning and planner amortization for continuous control [79.49319308600228]
  We take a hybrid approach, combining model predictive control (MPC) with a learned model and model-free policy learning. We find that well-tuned model-free agents are strong baselines even for high DoF control problems. We show that it is possible to distil a model-based planner into a policy that amortizes the planning without any loss of performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T12:00:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.