Towards a Rigorous Theoretical Analysis and Evaluation of GNN Explanations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09078v1
• Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:38:30 GMT
• Title: Towards a Rigorous Theoretical Analysis and Evaluation of GNN Explanations
• Authors: Chirag Agarwal, Marinka Zitnik, Himabindu Lakkaraju
• Abstract summary: We introduce the first axiomatic framework for theoretically analyzing, evaluating, and comparing state-of-the-art GNN explanation methods. We leverage these properties to present the first ever theoretical analysis of the effectiveness of state-of-the-art GNN explanation methods.
• Score: 25.954303305216094
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are increasingly employed in real-world applications, it becomes critical to ensure that the stakeholders understand the rationale behind their predictions. While several GNN explanation methods have been proposed recently, there has been little to no work on theoretically analyzing the behavior of these methods or systematically evaluating their effectiveness. Here, we introduce the first axiomatic framework for theoretically analyzing, evaluating, and comparing state-of-the-art GNN explanation methods. We outline and formalize the key desirable properties that all GNN explanation methods should satisfy in order to generate reliable explanations, namely, faithfulness, stability, and fairness. We leverage these properties to present the first ever theoretical analysis of the effectiveness of state-of-the-art GNN explanation methods. Our analysis establishes upper bounds on all the aforementioned properties for popular GNN explanation methods. We also leverage our framework to empirically evaluate these methods on multiple real-world datasets from diverse domains. Our empirical results demonstrate that some popular GNN explanation methods (e.g., gradient-based methods) perform no better than a random baseline and that methods which leverage the graph structure are more effective than those that solely rely on the node features.

Related papers

• Explainable Graph Neural Networks Under Fire [69.15708723429307]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) usually lack interpretability due to their complex computational behavior and the abstract nature of graphs. Most GNN explanation methods work in a post-hoc manner and provide explanations in the form of a small subset of important edges and/or nodes. In this paper we demonstrate that these explanations can unfortunately not be trusted, as common GNN explanation methods turn out to be highly susceptible to adversarial perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T16:09:16Z)
• A Manifold Perspective on the Statistical Generalization of Graph Neural Networks [84.01980526069075]
  We take a manifold perspective to establish the statistical generalization theory of GNNs on graphs sampled from a manifold in the spectral domain. We prove that the generalization bounds of GNNs decrease linearly with the size of the graphs in the logarithmic scale, and increase linearly with the spectral continuity constants of the filter functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T19:25:02Z)
• On the Generalization Capability of Temporal Graph Learning Algorithms: Theoretical Insights and a Simpler Method [59.52204415829695]
  Temporal Graph Learning (TGL) has become a prevalent technique across diverse real-world applications. This paper investigates the generalization ability of different TGL algorithms. We propose a simplified TGL network, which enjoys a small generalization error, improved overall performance, and lower model complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T08:22:22Z)
• Incorporating Retrieval-based Causal Learning with Information Bottlenecks for Interpretable Graph Neural Networks [12.892400744247565]
  We develop a novel interpretable causal GNN framework that incorporates retrieval-based causal learning with Graph Information Bottleneck (GIB) theory. We achieve 32.71% higher precision on real-world explanation scenarios with diverse explanation types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T09:57:39Z)
• Factorized Explainer for Graph Neural Networks [7.382632811417645]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have received increasing attention due to their ability to learn from graph-structured data. Post-hoc instance-level explanation methods have been proposed to understand GNN predictions. We introduce a novel factorized explanation model with theoretical performance guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-09T15:29:45Z)
• Generative Explanations for Graph Neural Network: Methods and Evaluations [16.67839967139831]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) achieve state-of-the-art performance in various graph-related tasks. The black-box nature of GNNs limits their interpretability and trustworthiness. Numerous explainability methods have been proposed to uncover the decision-making logic of GNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T22:07:15Z)
• DEGREE: Decomposition Based Explanation For Graph Neural Networks [55.38873296761104]
  We propose DEGREE to provide a faithful explanation for GNN predictions. By decomposing the information generation and aggregation mechanism of GNNs, DEGREE allows tracking the contributions of specific components of the input graph to the final prediction. We also design a subgraph level interpretation algorithm to reveal complex interactions between graph nodes that are overlooked by previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T10:29:52Z)
• Faithful Explanations for Deep Graph Models [44.3056871040946]
  This paper studies faithful explanations for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) It applies to existing explanation methods, including feature attributions and subgraph explanations. Third, we introduce emphk-hop Explanation with a Convolutional Core (KEC), a new explanation method that provably maximizes faithfulness to the original GNN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T07:18:56Z)
• SEEN: Sharpening Explanations for Graph Neural Networks using Explanations from Neighborhoods [0.0]
  We propose a method to improve the explanation quality of node classification tasks through aggregation of auxiliary explanations. Applying SEEN does not require modification of a graph and can be used with diverse explainability techniques. Experiments on matching motif-participating nodes from a given graph show great improvement in explanation accuracy of up to 12.71%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-16T03:04:46Z)
• Optimization of Graph Neural Networks: Implicit Acceleration by Skip Connections and More Depth [57.10183643449905]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been studied from the lens of expressive power and generalization. We study the dynamics of GNNs by studying deep skip optimization. Our results provide first theoretical support for the success of GNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T17:59:01Z)
• Fast Learning of Graph Neural Networks with Guaranteed Generalizability: One-hidden-layer Case [93.37576644429578]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) have made great progress recently on learning from graph-structured data in practice. We provide a theoretically-grounded generalizability analysis of GNNs with one hidden layer for both regression and binary classification problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-25T00:45:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.