Climate Change Conspiracy Theories on Social Media

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03318v1
• Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 15:56:44 GMT
• Title: Climate Change Conspiracy Theories on Social Media
• Authors: Aman Tyagi, Kathleen M. Carley
• Abstract summary: This paper discusses some of the major conspiracy theories related to climate change found in a large Twitter corpus. We use a state-of-the-art stance detection method to find whether conspiracy theories are more popular among Disbelievers or Believers of climate change.
• Score: 7.629857853338894
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: One of the critical emerging challenges in climate change communication is the prevalence of conspiracy theories. This paper discusses some of the major conspiracy theories related to climate change found in a large Twitter corpus. We use a state-of-the-art stance detection method to find whether conspiracy theories are more popular among Disbelievers or Believers of climate change. We then analyze which conspiracy theory is more popular than the others and how popularity changes with climate change belief. We find that Disbelievers of climate change are overwhelmingly responsible for sharing messages with conspiracy theory-related keywords, and not all conspiracy theories are equally shared. Lastly, we discuss the implications of our findings for climate change communication.

Related papers

• Googling the Big Lie: Search Engines, News Media, and the US 2020 Election Conspiracy [41.94295877935867]
  The Big Lie theory that the US 2020 presidential election was fraudulent remained a prominent part of the media agenda months after the election. We investigate how search engines provided news on this conspiracy by conducting a large-scale algorithm audit. We find that simply denying the conspiracy is the largest debunking strategy across all search engines. While Google has a strong mainstreaming effect on articles explicitly focused on the Big Lie, DuckDuckGo and Bing display, depending on the location, a large share of articles either supporting the conspiracy or failing to debunk it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T23:10:37Z)
• Climate change denial and anti-science communities on brazilian Telegram: climate disinformation as a gateway to broader conspiracy networks [0.0]
  This study seeks to answer the research question: how are Brazilian conspiracy theory communities on climate change and anti-science themes characterized and articulated on Telegram? It is worth noting that this study is part of a series of seven studies aimed at understanding and characterizing Brazilian conspiracy theory communities on Telegram.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T17:14:27Z)
• Augmented CARDS: A machine learning approach to identifying triggers of climate change misinformation on Twitter [14.111559061588983]
  Misinformation about climate change poses a significant threat to societal well-being. The rapid proliferation of online misinformation outpaces the ability of fact-checkers to debunk false claims. We develop a two-step hierarchical model, the Augmented CARDS model, specifically designed for detecting contrarian climate claims on Twitter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T06:03:07Z)
• "Here's Your Evidence": False Consensus in Public Twitter Discussions of COVID-19 Science [50.08057052734799]
  We estimate scientific consensus based on samples of abstracts from preprint servers. We find that anti-consensus posts and users, though overall less numerous than pro-consensus ones, are vastly over-represented on Twitter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T06:16:57Z)
• Understanding Opinions Towards Climate Change on Social Media [2.31449645503075]
  We aim to understand how real world events influence the opinions of individuals towards climate change related topics on social media. We extracted and analyzed a dataset of 13.6 millions tweets sent by 3.6 million users from 2006 to 2019. Our work acts as a first step towards understanding the evolution of pro-climate change communities around COP events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-02T20:02:34Z)
• The Conspiracy Money Machine: Uncovering Telegram's Conspiracy Channels and their Profit Model [50.80312055220701]
  We discover that conspiracy channels can be clustered into four distinct communities comprising over 17,000 channels. We find conspiracy theorists leverage e-commerce platforms to sell questionable products or lucratively promote them through affiliate links. We conclude that this business involves hundreds of thousands of donors and generates a turnover of almost $66 million.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T16:25:52Z)
• A Golden Age: Conspiracy Theories' Relationship with Misinformation Outlets, News Media, and the Wider Internet [6.917588580148212]
  We identify and publish a set of 755 different conspiracy theory websites dedicated to five conspiracy theories. We find that each set often hyperlinks to the same external domains, with COVID and QAnon conspiracy theory websites having the largest amount of shared connections. Examining the role of news media, we find that not only do outlets known for spreading misinformation hyperlink to our set of conspiracy theory websites more often than authentic news websites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T00:20:02Z)
• Where the Earth is flat and 9/11 is an inside job: A comparative algorithm audit of conspiratorial information in web search results [62.997667081978825]
  We examine the distribution of conspiratorial information in search results across five search engines: Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo and Yandex. We find that all search engines except Google consistently displayed conspiracy-promoting results and returned links to conspiracy-dedicated websites in their top results. Most conspiracy-promoting results came from social media and conspiracy-dedicated websites while conspiracy-debunking information was shared by scientific websites and, to a lesser extent, legacy media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T14:29:21Z)
• The Truth is Out There: Investigating Conspiracy Theories in Text Generation [66.01545519772527]
  We investigate the propensity for language models to generate conspiracy theory text. Our study focuses on testing these models for the elicitation of conspiracy theories. We introduce a new dataset consisting of conspiracy theory topics, machine-generated conspiracy theories, and human-written conspiracy theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T05:47:39Z)
• You are right. I am ALARMED -- But by Climate Change Counter Movement [40.66864319982138]
  We revisit the literature on climate misinformation in social sciences and repackage it to introduce in the community of NLP. We try to bridge this gap by scraping and releasing articles with known climate change misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T16:06:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.