Designing Recommender Systems to Depolarize
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.04953v1
- Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2021 03:23:42 GMT
- Title: Designing Recommender Systems to Depolarize
- Authors: Jonathan Stray
- Abstract summary: Polarization is implicated in the erosion of democracy and the progression to violence.
While algorithm-driven social media does not seem to be a primary driver of polarization at the country level, it could be a useful intervention point in polarized societies.
This paper examines algorithmic depolarization interventions with the goal of conflict transformation.
- Score: 0.32634122554913997
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Polarization is implicated in the erosion of democracy and the progression to
violence, which makes the polarization properties of large algorithmic content
selection systems (recommender systems) a matter of concern for peace and
security. While algorithm-driven social media does not seem to be a primary
driver of polarization at the country level, it could be a useful intervention
point in polarized societies. This paper examines algorithmic depolarization
interventions with the goal of conflict transformation: not suppressing or
eliminating conflict but moving towards more constructive conflict. Algorithmic
intervention is considered at three stages: which content is available
(moderation), how content is selected and personalized (ranking), and content
presentation and controls (user interface). Empirical studies of online
conflict suggest that the exposure diversity intervention proposed as an
antidote to "filter bubbles" can be improved and can even worsen polarization
under some conditions. Using civility metrics in conjunction with diversity in
content selection may be more effective. However, diversity-based interventions
have not been tested at scale and may not work in the diverse and dynamic
contexts of real platforms. Instead, intervening in platform polarization
dynamics will likely require continuous monitoring of polarization metrics,
such as the widely used "feeling thermometer." These metrics can be used to
evaluate product features, and potentially engineered as algorithmic
objectives. It may further prove necessary to include polarization measures in
the objective functions of recommender algorithms to prevent optimization
processes from creating conflict as a side effect.
Related papers
- Dynamic Detection of Relevant Objectives and Adaptation to Preference Drifts in Interactive Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization [2.4374097382908477]
We study the dynamic nature of DM preferences, which can evolve throughout the decision-making process and affect the relevance of objectives.
We propose methods to discard outdated or conflicting preferences when such shifts occur.
Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed methods effectively manage evolving preferences and significantly enhance the quality and desirability of the solutions produced by the algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-07T09:09:06Z) - Sequential Manipulation Against Rank Aggregation: Theory and Algorithm [119.57122943187086]
We leverage an online attack on the vulnerable data collection process.
From the game-theoretic perspective, the confrontation scenario is formulated as a distributionally robust game.
The proposed method manipulates the results of rank aggregation methods in a sequential manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T03:31:21Z) - Optimal Baseline Corrections for Off-Policy Contextual Bandits [61.740094604552475]
We aim to learn decision policies that optimize an unbiased offline estimate of an online reward metric.
We propose a single framework built on their equivalence in learning scenarios.
Our framework enables us to characterize the variance-optimal unbiased estimator and provide a closed-form solution for it.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-09T12:52:22Z) - Be Aware of the Neighborhood Effect: Modeling Selection Bias under Interference [50.95521705711802]
Previous studies have focused on addressing selection bias to achieve unbiased learning of the prediction model.
This paper formally formulates the neighborhood effect as an interference problem from the perspective of causal inference.
We propose a novel ideal loss that can be used to deal with selection bias in the presence of neighborhood effect.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-30T15:20:41Z) - Filter Bubble or Homogenization? Disentangling the Long-Term Effects of
Recommendations on User Consumption Patterns [4.197682068104959]
We develop a more refined definition of homogenization and the filter bubble effect by decomposing them into two key metrics.
We then use a novel agent-based simulation framework that enables a holistic view of the impact of recommendation systems on homogenization and filter bubble effects.
We introduce two new recommendation algorithms that take a more nuanced approach by accounting for both types of diversity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-22T23:12:20Z) - Interactive Graph Convolutional Filtering [79.34979767405979]
Interactive Recommender Systems (IRS) have been increasingly used in various domains, including personalized article recommendation, social media, and online advertising.
These problems are exacerbated by the cold start problem and data sparsity problem.
Existing Multi-Armed Bandit methods, despite their carefully designed exploration strategies, often struggle to provide satisfactory results in the early stages.
Our proposed method extends interactive collaborative filtering into the graph model to enhance the performance of collaborative filtering between users and items.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-04T09:02:31Z) - Rebalancing Social Feed to Minimize Polarization and Disagreement [24.939887831898453]
We propose a novel problem formulation aimed at slightly nudging users' social feeds in order to strike a balance between relevance and diversity.
Our approach is based on re-weighting the relative importance of the accounts that a user follows, so as to calibrate the frequency with which the content produced by various accounts is shown to the user.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-28T10:59:05Z) - Network polarization, filter bubbles, and echo chambers: An annotated
review of measures and reduction methods [0.0]
Polarization arises when the underlying network becomes characterized by highly connected groups with weak inter-group connectivity.
This work presents an annotated review of network polarization measures and models used to handle the polarization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-27T21:23:27Z) - The drivers of online polarization: fitting models to data [0.0]
echo chamber effect and opinion polarization may be driven by several factors including human biases in information consumption and personalized recommendations produced by feed algorithms.
Until now, studies have mainly used opinion dynamic models to explore the mechanisms behind the emergence of polarization and echo chambers.
We provide a method to numerically compare the opinion distributions obtained from simulations with those measured on social media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-31T17:00:41Z) - Identification of Subgroups With Similar Benefits in Off-Policy Policy
Evaluation [60.71312668265873]
We develop a method to balance the need for personalization with confident predictions.
We show that our method can be used to form accurate predictions of heterogeneous treatment effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-28T23:19:12Z) - End-to-End Learning and Intervention in Games [60.41921763076017]
We provide a unified framework for learning and intervention in games.
We propose two approaches, respectively based on explicit and implicit differentiation.
The analytical results are validated using several real-world problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-26T18:39:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.