Causal reappraisal of the quantum three box paradox

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.13937v1
• Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:58:31 GMT
• Title: Causal reappraisal of the quantum three box paradox
• Authors: Pawel Blasiak, Ewa Borsuk
• Abstract summary: Quantum three box paradox is a prototypical example of some bizarre predictions for intermediate measurements made on pre- and post-selected systems. We consider an array of potential causal structures behind the experiment, eliminating those without enough explanatory power. We show that the latter is indispensable, but only when the full statistics is taken into account.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Quantum three box paradox is a prototypical example of some bizarre predictions for intermediate measurements made on pre- and post-selected systems. Although in principle those effects can be explained by measurement disturbance, it is not clear what mechanisms are required to fully account for the observed correlations. In this paper, this paradox is scrutinised from the causal point of view. We consider an array of potential causal structures behind the experiment, eliminating those without enough explanatory power. This gives a means of differentiating between the various mechanisms in which measurement disturbance can propagate in the system. Specifically, we distinguish whether it is just the measurement outcome or the full measurement context that is required for the causal explanation of the observed statistics. We show that the latter is indispensable, but only when the full statistics is taken into account (which includes checking the third box too). Furthermore, we discuss the realism assumption which posits the existence of preexisting values revealed by measurements. It is shown that in this case measurement disturbance is necessary. Interestingly, without the realism assumption, the original version of the paradox (with just two boxes considered for inspection) can be explained without resorting to any measurement disturbance. These various results illustrate the richness of the paradox which is better appreciated from the causal perspective.

Related papers

• Proposal of an optical Bell's experiment to test the boundary between determinism and indeterminism in Quantum Mechanics [41.94295877935867]
  It was recently noted the existence of an apparently discontinuous boundary between determinism and indeterminism in Quantum Mechanics. We propose to explore this boundary by recording the distribution of outcomes of a given parity interrupted by outcomes of the other parity. The features of these distributions for small rotations of the angle settings near critical points may indicate whether the underlying process is in-deterministic or not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T14:48:08Z)
• Testing trajectory-based determinism via time probability distributions [44.99833362998488]
  Bohmian mechanics (BM) has inherited more predictive power than quantum mechanics (QM) We introduce a prescription for constructing a flight-time probability distribution within generic trajectory-equipped theories. We derive probability distributions that are unreachable by QM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T11:36:38Z)
• Measurement incompatibility is strictly stronger than disturbance [44.99833362998488]
  Heisenberg argued that measurements irreversibly alter the state of the system on which they are acting, causing an irreducible disturbance on subsequent measurements. This article shows that measurement incompatibility is indeed a sufficient condition for irreversibility of measurement disturbance. However, we exhibit a toy theory, termed the minimal classical theory (MCT), that is a counterexample for the converse implication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T13:47:00Z)
• A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality [55.6970314129444]
  We argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality. Our proposed framework is rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T13:15:48Z)
• Events in quantum mechanics are maximally non-absolute [0.9176056742068814]
  We prove that quantum correlations can be maximally non-absolute according to both quantifiers. We show that chained Bell inequalities (and relaxations thereof) are also valid constraints for Wigner's experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-19T21:15:16Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Quantum erasing the memory of Wigner's friend [0.0]
  Wigner's friend paradox concerns one of the most puzzling problems of quantum mechanics. At the core of the paradox lies the description of an observer and the object it measures as a closed system obeying the Schr"odinger equation. We argue that the three apparently incompatible properties used to question the consistency of quantum mechanics correspond to two logically distinct contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-21T14:24:58Z)
• On the complex behaviour of the density in composite quantum systems [62.997667081978825]
  We study how the probability of presence of a particle is distributed between the two parts of a composite fermionic system. We prove that it is a non-perturbative property and we find out a large/small coupling constant duality. Inspired by the proof of KAM theorem, we are able to deal with this problem by introducing a cut-off in energies that eliminates these small denominators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-14T21:41:15Z)
• Unitary-Only Quantum Theory Cannot Consistently Describe the Use of Itself: On the Frauchiger-Renner Paradox [0.0]
  The Frauchiger-Renner Paradox is an extension of paradoxes based on the 'Problem of Measurement,' such as Schrodinger's Cat and Wigner's Friend. This paper discusses a basic inconsistency arising in the FR scenario at a much earlier point than the derived contradiction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-04T18:34:20Z)
• Intersubjectivity and value reproducibility of outcomes of quantum measurements [0.0]
  We show that a quantum mechanical analysis turns down the view that every measurement determines a single value as its outcome. Contrary to the widespread view in favor of the second, we shall show that quantum mechanics predicts that only the first case occurs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-11-08T12:52:32Z)
• A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner's friend paradox [0.0]
  We prove that if quantum evolution is controllable on the scale of an observer, then one of 'No-Superdeterminism', 'Locality' or 'Absoluteness of Observed Events' must be false. We show that although the violation of Bell-type inequalities in such scenarios is not in general sufficient to demonstrate the contradiction between those three assumptions, new inequalities can be derived in a theory-independent manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-12T08:09:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.