Intersubjectivity and value reproducibility of outcomes of quantum measurements

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.10893v5
• Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 15:17:04 GMT
• Title: Intersubjectivity and value reproducibility of outcomes of quantum measurements
• Authors: Masanao Ozawa,
• Abstract summary: We show that a quantum mechanical analysis turns down the view that every measurement determines a single value as its outcome. Contrary to the widespread view in favor of the second, we shall show that quantum mechanics predicts that only the first case occurs.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Every measurement determines a single value as its outcome, and yet quantum mechanics predicts it only probabilistically. The Kochen-Specker theorem and Bell's inequality are often considered to reject a realist view but favor a skeptical view that measuring an observable does not mean ascertaining the value that it has, but producing the outcome, having only a personal meaning. However, precise analysis supporting this view is unknown. Here, we show that a quantum mechanical analysis turns down this view. Supposing that two observers simultaneously measure the same observable, we can well pose the question as to whether they always obtain the same outcome, or whether the probability distributions are the same, but the outcomes are uncorrelated. Contrary to the widespread view in favor of the second, we shall show that quantum mechanics predicts that only the first case occurs. We further show that any measurement establishes a time-like entanglement between the observable to be measured and the meter after the measurement, which causes the space-like entanglement between the meters of different observers. We also show that our conclusion cannot be extended to measurements of so-called `generalized' observables, suggesting a demand for reconsidering the notion of observables in foundations of quantum mechanics.

Related papers

• Quantifying non-Hermiticity using single- and many-particle quantum properties [14.37149160708975]
  The non-Hermitian paradigm of quantum systems displays salient features drastically different from Hermitian counterparts. We propose a formalism that quantifies the (dis-)similarity of these right and left ensembles, for single- as well as many-particle quantum properties. Our findings can be instrumental in unveiling new exotic quantum phases of non-Hermitian quantum many-body systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T13:04:47Z)
• Testing trajectory-based determinism via time probability distributions [44.99833362998488]
  Bohmian mechanics (BM) has inherited more predictive power than quantum mechanics (QM) We introduce a prescription for constructing a flight-time probability distribution within generic trajectory-equipped theories. We derive probability distributions that are unreachable by QM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T11:36:38Z)
• Epistemic Boundaries and Quantum Uncertainty: What Local Observers Can (Not) Predict [0.0]
  We argue that post-quantum theories can offer a predictive advantage while conforming to the Born rule on average. We uncover a fascinating possibility: When the assumption of reliable intersubjectivity between different observers is violated, subjective predictive advantage can, in principle, exist. The findings reconcile us to quantum uncertainty as an aspect of limits on Nature's predictability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T14:09:18Z)
• Observation of partial and infinite-temperature thermalization induced by repeated measurements on a quantum hardware [62.997667081978825]
  We observe partial and infinite-temperature thermalization on a quantum superconducting processor. We show that the convergence does not tend to a completely mixed (infinite-temperature) state, but to a block-diagonal state in the observable basis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-14T15:18:11Z)
• Quantum mechanical rules for observed observers and the consistency of quantum theory [0.0]
  I argue that the rules of unitary quantum mechanics imply that observers who will themselves be subject to measurements in a linear combination of macroscopic states (cat" measurements) cannot make reliable predictions on the results of experiments performed after such measurements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T00:05:20Z)
• Causal reappraisal of the quantum three box paradox [0.0]
  Quantum three box paradox is a prototypical example of some bizarre predictions for intermediate measurements made on pre- and post-selected systems. We consider an array of potential causal structures behind the experiment, eliminating those without enough explanatory power. We show that the latter is indispensable, but only when the full statistics is taken into account.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-29T12:58:31Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• How well can we guess the outcome of measurements of non-commuting observables? [0.0]
  Heisenberg's uncertainty relation says there is an ultimate limit to how precisely we may predict the outcome of position and momentum measurements on a quantum system. We show that this limit may be violated by an arbitrarily large factor if one aims, instead, to guess the unknown value of a past measurement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-30T13:31:36Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Entropic Uncertainty Relations and the Quantum-to-Classical transition [77.34726150561087]
  We aim to shed some light on the quantum-to-classical transition as seen through the analysis of uncertainty relations. We employ entropic uncertainty relations to show that it is only by the inclusion of imprecision in our model of macroscopic measurements that we can prepare a system with two simultaneously well-defined quantities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T14:01:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.