Simulation as Experiment: An Empirical Critique of Simulation Research on Recommender Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.14333v1
• Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 21:05:01 GMT
• Title: Simulation as Experiment: An Empirical Critique of Simulation Research on Recommender Systems
• Authors: Amy A. Winecoff, Matthew Sun, Eli Lucherini, Arvind Narayanan
• Abstract summary: We argue that simulation studies of recommender system (RS) evolution are conceptually similar to empirical experimental approaches. By adopting standards and practices common in empirical disciplines, simulation researchers can mitigate many of these weaknesses.
• Score: 4.006331916849688
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Simulation can enable the study of recommender system (RS) evolution while circumventing many of the issues of empirical longitudinal studies; simulations are comparatively easier to implement, are highly controlled, and pose no ethical risk to human participants. How simulation can best contribute to scientific insight about RS alongside qualitative and quantitative empirical approaches is an open question. Philosophers and researchers have long debated the epistemological nature of simulation compared to wholly theoretical or empirical methods. Simulation is often implicitly or explicitly conceptualized as occupying a middle ground between empirical and theoretical approaches, allowing researchers to realize the benefits of both. However, what is often ignored in such arguments is that without firm grounding in any single methodological tradition, simulation studies have no agreed upon scientific norms or standards, resulting in a patchwork of theoretical motivations, approaches, and implementations that are difficult to reconcile. In this position paper, we argue that simulation studies of RS are conceptually similar to empirical experimental approaches and therefore can be evaluated using the standards of empirical research methods. Using this empirical lens, we argue that the combination of high heterogeneity in approaches and low transparency in methods in simulation studies of RS has limited their interpretability, generalizability, and replicability. We contend that by adopting standards and practices common in empirical disciplines, simulation researchers can mitigate many of these weaknesses.

Related papers

• Design Principles for Falsifiable, Replicable and Reproducible Empirical ML Research [2.3265565167163906]
  Empirical research plays a fundamental role in the machine learning domain. We propose a model for the empirical research process, accompanied by guidelines to uphold the validity of empirical research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T11:37:59Z)
• LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific Discovery [141.39722070734737]
  We propose to enhance the knowledge-driven, abstract reasoning abilities of Large Language Models with the computational strength of simulations. We introduce Scientific Generative Agent (SGA), a bilevel optimization framework. We conduct experiments to demonstrate our framework's efficacy in law discovery and molecular design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T03:04:10Z)
• Large Language Models Need Consultants for Reasoning: Becoming an Expert in a Complex Human System Through Behavior Simulation [5.730580726163518]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities comparable to humans in fields such as mathematics, law, coding, common sense, and world knowledge. We propose a novel reasoning framework, termed Mosaic Expert Observation Wall'' (MEOW) exploiting generative-agents-based simulation technique.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T03:33:32Z)
• A Double Machine Learning Approach to Combining Experimental and Observational Data [59.29868677652324]
  We propose a double machine learning approach to combine experimental and observational studies. Our framework tests for violations of external validity and ignorability under milder assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T02:53:11Z)
• User Behavior Simulation with Large Language Model based Agents [116.74368915420065]
  We propose an LLM-based agent framework and design a sandbox environment to simulate real user behaviors. Based on extensive experiments, we find that the simulated behaviors of our method are very close to the ones of real humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T02:58:35Z)
• Online simulator-based experimental design for cognitive model selection [74.76661199843284]
  We propose BOSMOS: an approach to experimental design that can select between computational models without tractable likelihoods. In simulated experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed BOSMOS technique can accurately select models in up to 2 orders of magnitude less time than existing LFI alternatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T21:41:01Z)
• Synthetic Data-Based Simulators for Recommender Systems: A Survey [55.60116686945561]
  This survey aims at providing a comprehensive overview of the recent trends in the field of modeling and simulation. We start with the motivation behind the development of frameworks implementing the simulations -- simulators. We provide a new consistent classification of existing simulators based on their functionality, approbation, and industrial effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T19:33:21Z)
• Learnability of Competitive Threshold Models [11.005966612053262]
  We study the learnability of the competitive threshold model from a theoretical perspective. We demonstrate how competitive threshold models can be seamlessly simulated by artificial neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-08T01:11:51Z)
• T-RECS: A Simulation Tool to Study the Societal Impact of Recommender Systems [5.592114738742928]
  We introduce T-RECS, an open-sourced Python package designed for researchers to simulate recommendation systems. To demonstrate the flexibility of T-RECS, we perform a replication of two prior simulation-based research on sociotechnical systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-19T15:16:44Z)
• RoboTHOR: An Open Simulation-to-Real Embodied AI Platform [56.50243383294621]
  We introduce RoboTHOR to democratize research in interactive and embodied visual AI. We show there exists a significant gap between the performance of models trained in simulation when they are tested in both simulations and their carefully constructed physical analogs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-14T20:52:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.