Combining K-means type algorithms with Hill Climbing for Joint Stratification and Sample Allocation Designs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.08038v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 08:41:58 GMT
• Title: Combining K-means type algorithms with Hill Climbing for Joint Stratification and Sample Allocation Designs
• Authors: Mervyn O'Luing, Steven Prestwich, S. Armagan Tarim
• Abstract summary: This is a sample problem in which we search for the optimal stratification from the set of all possible stratifications of basic strata. evaluating the cost of each solution is expensive. We compare the above multi-stage combination of algorithms with three recent algorithms and report the solution costs, evaluation times and training times.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper we combine the k-means and/or k-means type algorithms with a hill climbing algorithm in stages to solve the joint stratification and sample allocation problem. This is a combinatorial optimisation problem in which we search for the optimal stratification from the set of all possible stratifications of basic strata. Each stratification being a solution the quality of which is measured by its cost. This problem is intractable for larger sets. Furthermore evaluating the cost of each solution is expensive. A number of heuristic algorithms have already been developed to solve this problem with the aim of finding acceptable solutions in reasonable computation times. However, the heuristics for these algorithms need to be trained in order to optimise performance in each instance. We compare the above multi-stage combination of algorithms with three recent algorithms and report the solution costs, evaluation times and training times. The multi-stage combinations generally compare well with the recent algorithms both in the case of atomic and continuous strata and provide the survey designer with a greater choice of algorithms to choose from.

Related papers

• Frugal Algorithm Selection [1.079960007119637]
  There is no single algorithm that works well for all instances of a problem. In this work, we explore reducing this cost by choosing a subset of the training instances on which to train. We approach this problem in three ways: using active learning to decide based on prediction uncertainty, augmenting the algorithm predictors with a timeout predictor, and collecting training data using a progressively increasing timeout.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T19:23:30Z)
• Effective anytime algorithm for multiobjective combinatorial optimization problems [3.2061579211871383]
  A set of efficient solutions that are well-spread in the objective space is preferred to provide the decision maker with a great variety of solutions. We propose a new exact algorithm for multiobjective optimization combining three novel ideas to enhance the anytime behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T11:53:44Z)
• Accelerating Cutting-Plane Algorithms via Reinforcement Learning Surrogates [49.84541884653309]
  A current standard approach to solving convex discrete optimization problems is the use of cutting-plane algorithms. Despite the existence of a number of general-purpose cut-generating algorithms, large-scale discrete optimization problems continue to suffer from intractability. We propose a method for accelerating cutting-plane algorithms via reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T20:11:56Z)
• A Sequential Deep Learning Algorithm for Sampled Mixed-integer Optimisation Problems [0.3867363075280544]
  We introduce and analyse two efficient algorithms for mixed-integer optimisation problems. We show that both algorithms exhibit finite-time convergence towards the optimal solution. We establish quantitatively the efficacy of these algorithms by means of three numerical tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-25T17:10:52Z)
• Algorithm Selection on a Meta Level [58.720142291102135]
  We introduce the problem of meta algorithm selection, which essentially asks for the best way to combine a given set of algorithm selectors. We present a general methodological framework for meta algorithm selection as well as several concrete learning methods as instantiations of this framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-20T11:23:21Z)
• Towards Optimally Efficient Tree Search with Deep Learning [76.64632985696237]
  This paper investigates the classical integer least-squares problem which estimates signals integer from linear models. The problem is NP-hard and often arises in diverse applications such as signal processing, bioinformatics, communications and machine learning. We propose a general hyper-accelerated tree search (HATS) algorithm by employing a deep neural network to estimate the optimal estimation for the underlying simplified memory-bounded A* algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-07T08:00:02Z)
• A Simulated Annealing Algorithm for Joint Stratification and Sample Allocation Designs [0.0]
  This study combines simulated annealing with delta evaluation to solve the joint stratification and sample allocation problem. In this problem, atomic strata are partitioned into mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive strata. The Bell number of possible solutions is enormous, for even a moderate number of atomic strata, and an additional layer of complexity is added with the evaluation time of each solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-25T20:27:49Z)
• Performance Analysis of Meta-heuristic Algorithms for a Quadratic Assignment Problem [6.555180412600522]
  A quadratic assignment problem (QAP) is an optimization problem that belongs to the class of NP-hard ones. Heuristics and meta-heuristics algorithm are prevalent solution methods for this problem. This paper is one of comparative studies to apply different metaheuristic algorithms for solving the QAP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T15:02:07Z)
• Run2Survive: A Decision-theoretic Approach to Algorithm Selection based on Survival Analysis [75.64261155172856]
  survival analysis (SA) naturally supports censored data and offers appropriate ways to use such data for learning distributional models of algorithm runtime. We leverage such models as a basis of a sophisticated decision-theoretic approach to algorithm selection, which we dub Run2Survive. In an extensive experimental study with the standard benchmark ASlib, our approach is shown to be highly competitive and in many cases even superior to state-of-the-art AS approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-06T15:20:17Z)
• Beyond Worst-Case Analysis in Stochastic Approximation: Moment Estimation Improves Instance Complexity [58.70807593332932]
  We study oracle complexity of gradient based methods for approximation problems. We focus on instance-dependent complexity instead of worst case complexity. Our proposed algorithm and its analysis provide a theoretical justification for the success of moment estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T09:25:47Z)
• Extreme Algorithm Selection With Dyadic Feature Representation [78.13985819417974]
  We propose the setting of extreme algorithm selection (XAS) where we consider fixed sets of thousands of candidate algorithms. We assess the applicability of state-of-the-art AS techniques to the XAS setting and propose approaches leveraging a dyadic feature representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-29T09:40:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.