Explainable Reinforcement Learning for Broad-XAI: A Conceptual Framework
and Survey
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.09003v1
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 05:18:50 GMT
- Title: Explainable Reinforcement Learning for Broad-XAI: A Conceptual Framework
and Survey
- Authors: Richard Dazeley, Peter Vamplew, Francisco Cruz
- Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods provide a potential backbone for the cognitive model required for the development of Broad-XAI.
RL represents a suite of approaches that have had increasing success in solving a range of sequential decision-making problems.
This paper aims to introduce a conceptual framework, called the Causal XRL Framework (CXF), that unifies the current XRL research and uses RL as a backbone to the development of Broad-XAI.
- Score: 0.7366405857677226
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Broad Explainable Artificial Intelligence moves away from interpreting
individual decisions based on a single datum and aims to provide integrated
explanations from multiple machine learning algorithms into a coherent
explanation of an agent's behaviour that is aligned to the communication needs
of the explainee. Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods, we propose, provide a
potential backbone for the cognitive model required for the development of
Broad-XAI. RL represents a suite of approaches that have had increasing success
in solving a range of sequential decision-making problems. However, these
algorithms all operate as black-box problem solvers, where they obfuscate their
decision-making policy through a complex array of values and functions.
EXplainable RL (XRL) is relatively recent field of research that aims to
develop techniques to extract concepts from the agent's: perception of the
environment; intrinsic/extrinsic motivations/beliefs; Q-values, goals and
objectives. This paper aims to introduce a conceptual framework, called the
Causal XRL Framework (CXF), that unifies the current XRL research and uses RL
as a backbone to the development of Broad-XAI. Additionally, we recognise that
RL methods have the ability to incorporate a range of technologies to allow
agents to adapt to their environment. CXF is designed for the incorporation of
many standard RL extensions and integrated with external ontologies and
communication facilities so that the agent can answer questions that explain
outcomes and justify its decisions.
Related papers
- Diffusion-Based Offline RL for Improved Decision-Making in Augmented ARC Task [10.046325073900297]
We introduce an augmented offline RL dataset for Abstraction and Reasoning (SOLAR)
SOLAR enables the application of offline RL methods by offering sufficient experience data.
Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the offline RL approach on a simple ARC task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-15T06:48:27Z) - Towards an Information Theoretic Framework of Context-Based Offline
Meta-Reinforcement Learning [50.976910714839065]
Context-based OMRL (COMRL) as a popular paradigm, aims to learn a universal policy conditioned on effective task representations.
We show that COMRL algorithms are essentially optimizing the same mutual information objective between the task variable $boldsymbolM$ and its latent representation $boldsymbolZ$ by implementing various approximate bounds.
Based on the theoretical insight and the information bottleneck principle, we arrive at a novel algorithm dubbed UNICORN, which exhibits remarkable generalization across a broad spectrum of RL benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-04T09:58:42Z) - Pangu-Agent: A Fine-Tunable Generalist Agent with Structured Reasoning [50.47568731994238]
Key method for creating Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents is Reinforcement Learning (RL)
This paper presents a general framework model for integrating and learning structured reasoning into AI agents' policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-22T17:57:57Z) - Reinforcement Learning-assisted Evolutionary Algorithm: A Survey and
Research Opportunities [63.258517066104446]
Reinforcement learning integrated as a component in the evolutionary algorithm has demonstrated superior performance in recent years.
We discuss the RL-EA integration method, the RL-assisted strategy adopted by RL-EA, and its applications according to the existing literature.
In the applications of RL-EA section, we also demonstrate the excellent performance of RL-EA on several benchmarks and a range of public datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-25T15:06:05Z) - IxDRL: A Novel Explainable Deep Reinforcement Learning Toolkit based on
Analyses of Interestingness [0.0]
We propose a new framework based on analyses of interestingness.
Our tool provides various measures of RL agent competence stemming from interestingness analysis.
We show that our framework can provide agent designers with insights about RL agent competence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-18T02:43:19Z) - A Survey on Explainable Reinforcement Learning: Concepts, Algorithms,
Challenges [38.70863329476517]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a popular machine learning paradigm where intelligent agents interact with the environment to fulfill a long-term goal.
Despite the encouraging results achieved, the deep neural network-based backbone is widely deemed as a black box that impedes practitioners to trust and employ trained agents in realistic scenarios where high security and reliability are essential.
To alleviate this issue, a large volume of literature devoted to shedding light on the inner workings of the intelligent agents has been proposed, by constructing intrinsic interpretability or post-hoc explainability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-12T13:52:06Z) - Collective eXplainable AI: Explaining Cooperative Strategies and Agent
Contribution in Multiagent Reinforcement Learning with Shapley Values [68.8204255655161]
This study proposes a novel approach to explain cooperative strategies in multiagent RL using Shapley values.
Results could have implications for non-discriminatory decision making, ethical and responsible AI-derived decisions or policy making under fairness constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-04T10:28:57Z) - Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learning [68.8204255655161]
We review recent works in the direction to attain Explainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL)
In critical situations where it is essential to justify and explain the agent's behaviour, better explainability and interpretability of RL models could help gain scientific insight on the inner workings of what is still considered a black box.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-15T10:11:42Z) - SUNRISE: A Simple Unified Framework for Ensemble Learning in Deep
Reinforcement Learning [102.78958681141577]
We present SUNRISE, a simple unified ensemble method, which is compatible with various off-policy deep reinforcement learning algorithms.
SUNRISE integrates two key ingredients: (a) ensemble-based weighted Bellman backups, which re-weight target Q-values based on uncertainty estimates from a Q-ensemble, and (b) an inference method that selects actions using the highest upper-confidence bounds for efficient exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-09T17:08:44Z) - Explainable Reinforcement Learning: A Survey [0.0]
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has gained increased traction over the last few years.
XAI models exhibit one detrimential characteristic: a performance-transparency trade-off.
This survey attempts to address this gap by offering an overview of Explainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL) methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-13T10:52:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.