Bayesian Topic Regression for Causal Inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.05317v1
• Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 16:40:43 GMT
• Title: Bayesian Topic Regression for Causal Inference
• Authors: Maximilian Ahrens, Julian Ashwin, Jan-Peter Calliess, Vu Nguyen
• Abstract summary: Causal inference using observational text data is becoming increasingly popular in many research areas. This paper presents the Bayesian Topic Regression model that uses both text and numerical information to model an outcome variable.
• Score: 3.9082355007261427
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Causal inference using observational text data is becoming increasingly popular in many research areas. This paper presents the Bayesian Topic Regression (BTR) model that uses both text and numerical information to model an outcome variable. It allows estimation of both discrete and continuous treatment effects. Furthermore, it allows for the inclusion of additional numerical confounding factors next to text data. To this end, we combine a supervised Bayesian topic model with a Bayesian regression framework and perform supervised representation learning for the text features jointly with the regression parameter training, respecting the Frisch-Waugh-Lovell theorem. Our paper makes two main contributions. First, we provide a regression framework that allows causal inference in settings when both text and numerical confounders are of relevance. We show with synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets that our joint approach recovers ground truth with lower bias than any benchmark model, when text and numerical features are correlated. Second, experiments on two real-world datasets demonstrate that a joint and supervised learning strategy also yields superior prediction results compared to strategies that estimate regression weights for text and non-text features separately, being even competitive with more complex deep neural networks.

Related papers

• From Text to Treatment Effects: A Meta-Learning Approach to Handling Text-Based Confounding [7.5348062792]
  This paper examines the performance of meta-learners when confounding variables are expressed in text. We show that learners using pre-trained text representations of confounders achieve improved CATE estimates. Due to the entangled nature of the text embeddings, these models do not fully match the performance of meta-learners with perfect confounder knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T19:46:19Z)
• Generalized Regression with Conditional GANs [2.4171019220503402]
  We propose to learn a prediction function whose outputs, when paired with the corresponding inputs, are indistinguishable from feature-label pairs in the training dataset. We show that this approach to regression makes fewer assumptions on the distribution of the data we are fitting to and, therefore, has better representation capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-21T01:27:47Z)
• How Well Do Text Embedding Models Understand Syntax? [50.440590035493074]
  The ability of text embedding models to generalize across a wide range of syntactic contexts remains under-explored. Our findings reveal that existing text embedding models have not sufficiently addressed these syntactic understanding challenges. We propose strategies to augment the generalization ability of text embedding models in diverse syntactic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T08:51:00Z)
• Linked shrinkage to improve estimation of interaction effects in regression models [0.0]
  We develop an estimator that adapts well to two-way interaction terms in a regression model. We evaluate the potential of the model for inference, which is notoriously hard for selection strategies. Our models can be very competitive to a more advanced machine learner, like random forest, even for fairly large sample sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T10:03:39Z)
• Inducing Causal Structure for Abstractive Text Summarization [76.1000380429553]
  We introduce a Structural Causal Model (SCM) to induce the underlying causal structure of the summarization data. We propose a Causality Inspired Sequence-to-Sequence model (CI-Seq2Seq) to learn the causal representations that can mimic the causal factors. Experimental results on two widely used text summarization datasets demonstrate the advantages of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-24T16:06:36Z)
• Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
  We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks. The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data. Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z)
• Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Text Summarization [52.765898203824975]
  We introduce inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) as an effective paradigm for training abstractive summarization models. Experimental results across datasets in different domains demonstrate the superiority of our proposed IRL model for summarization over MLE and RL baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T23:45:05Z)
• MeetSum: Transforming Meeting Transcript Summarization using Transformers! [2.1915057426589746]
  We utilize a Transformer-based Pointer Generator Network to generate abstract summaries for meeting transcripts. This model uses 2 LSTMs as an encoder and a decoder, a Pointer network which copies words from the inputted text, and a Generator network to produce out-of-vocabulary words. We show that training the model on a news summary dataset and using zero-shot learning to test it on the meeting dataset proves to produce better results than training it on the AMI meeting dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-13T16:34:09Z)
• Synthetic Dataset Generation of Driver Telematics [0.0]
  This article describes techniques employed in the production of a synthetic dataset of driver telematics emulated from a similar real insurance dataset. It follows a three-stage process using machine learning algorithms. The resulting dataset is evaluated by comparing the synthetic and real datasets when Poisson and gamma regression models are fitted to the respective data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-30T15:52:56Z)
• Understanding Neural Abstractive Summarization Models via Uncertainty [54.37665950633147]
  seq2seq abstractive summarization models generate text in a free-form manner. We study the entropy, or uncertainty, of the model's token-level predictions. We show that uncertainty is a useful perspective for analyzing summarization and text generation models more broadly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T16:57:27Z)
• Learning from Context or Names? An Empirical Study on Neural Relation Extraction [112.06614505580501]
  We study the effect of two main information sources in text: textual context and entity mentions (names) We propose an entity-masked contrastive pre-training framework for relation extraction (RE) Our framework can improve the effectiveness and robustness of neural models in different RE scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T11:21:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.