Spline-PINN: Approaching PDEs without Data using Fast, Physics-Informed Hermite-Spline CNNs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07143v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 08:10:23 GMT
• Title: Spline-PINN: Approaching PDEs without Data using Fast, Physics-Informed Hermite-Spline CNNs
• Authors: Nils Wandel, Michael Weinmann, Michael Neidlin, Reinhard Klein
• Abstract summary: Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) are notoriously difficult to solve. In this paper, we propose to approach the solution of PDEs based on a novel technique that combines the advantages of two recently emerging machine learning based approaches.
• Score: 4.560331122656578
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) are notoriously difficult to solve. In general, closed-form solutions are not available and numerical approximation schemes are computationally expensive. In this paper, we propose to approach the solution of PDEs based on a novel technique that combines the advantages of two recently emerging machine learning based approaches. First, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) learn continuous solutions of PDEs and can be trained with little to no ground truth data. However, PINNs do not generalize well to unseen domains. Second, convolutional neural networks provide fast inference and generalize but either require large amounts of training data or a physics-constrained loss based on finite differences that can lead to inaccuracies and discretization artifacts. We leverage the advantages of both of these approaches by using Hermite spline kernels in order to continuously interpolate a grid-based state representation that can be handled by a CNN. This allows for training without any precomputed training data using a physics-informed loss function only and provides fast, continuous solutions that generalize to unseen domains. We demonstrate the potential of our method at the examples of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation and the damped wave equation. Our models are able to learn several intriguing phenomena such as Karman vortex streets, the Magnus effect, Doppler effect, interference patterns and wave reflections. Our quantitative assessment and an interactive real-time demo show that we are narrowing the gap in accuracy of unsupervised ML based methods to industrial CFD solvers while being orders of magnitude faster.

Related papers

• Solving Poisson Equations using Neural Walk-on-Spheres [80.1675792181381]
  We propose Neural Walk-on-Spheres (NWoS), a novel neural PDE solver for the efficient solution of high-dimensional Poisson equations. We demonstrate the superiority of NWoS in accuracy, speed, and computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T17:59:22Z)
• Learning Generic Solutions for Multiphase Transport in Porous Media via the Flux Functions Operator [0.0]
  DeepDeepONet has emerged as a powerful tool for accelerating rendering fluxDEs. We use Physics-In DeepONets (PI-DeepONets) to achieve this mapping without any input paired-output observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-03T21:10:30Z)
• A physics-informed neural network framework for modeling obstacle-related equations [7.159808388704309]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are an attractive tool for solving partial differential equations based on sparse and noisy data. Here we extend PINNs to solve obstacle-related PDEs which present a great computational challenge. The performance of the proposed PINNs is demonstrated in multiple scenarios for linear and nonlinear PDEs subject to regular and irregular obstacles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T09:22:28Z)
• Implicit Stochastic Gradient Descent for Training Physics-informed Neural Networks [51.92362217307946]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have effectively been demonstrated in solving forward and inverse differential equation problems. PINNs are trapped in training failures when the target functions to be approximated exhibit high-frequency or multi-scale features. In this paper, we propose to employ implicit gradient descent (ISGD) method to train PINNs for improving the stability of training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T08:17:47Z)
• RBF-MGN:Solving spatiotemporal PDEs with Physics-informed Graph Neural Network [4.425915683879297]
  We propose a novel framework based on graph neural networks (GNNs) and radial basis function finite difference (RBF-FD) RBF-FD is used to construct a high-precision difference format of the differential equations to guide model training. We illustrate the generalizability, accuracy, and efficiency of the proposed algorithms on different PDE parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-06T10:08:02Z)
• On NeuroSymbolic Solutions for PDEs [12.968529838140036]
  Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have gained immense popularity as an alternate method for numerically solving PDEs. In this work we explore a NeuroSymbolic approach to approximate the solution for PDEs. We show that the NeuroSymbolic approximations are consistently 1-2 order of magnitude better than just the neural or symbolic approximations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-11T16:04:20Z)
• Learning to Solve PDE-constrained Inverse Problems with Graph Networks [51.89325993156204]
  In many application domains across science and engineering, we are interested in solving inverse problems with constraints defined by a partial differential equation (PDE) Here we explore GNNs to solve such PDE-constrained inverse problems. We demonstrate computational speedups of up to 90x using GNNs compared to principled solvers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T18:48:01Z)
• Improved Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Model Ensembles [81.38804205212425]
  We propose to expand the solution interval gradually to make the PINN converge to the correct solution. All ensemble members converge to the same solution in the vicinity of observed data. We show experimentally that the proposed method can improve the accuracy of the found solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:05:34Z)
• Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks [55.83255669840384]
  Recent work in scientific machine learning has developed so-called physics-informed neural network (PINN) models. We demonstrate that, while existing PINN methodologies can learn good models for relatively trivial problems, they can easily fail to learn relevant physical phenomena even for simple PDEs. We show that these possible failure modes are not due to the lack of expressivity in the NN architecture, but that the PINN's setup makes the loss landscape very hard to optimize.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-02T16:06:45Z)
• Conditional physics informed neural networks [85.48030573849712]
  We introduce conditional PINNs (physics informed neural networks) for estimating the solution of classes of eigenvalue problems. We show that a single deep neural network can learn the solution of partial differential equations for an entire class of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-06T18:29:14Z)
• Physics-Informed Neural Network Method for Solving One-Dimensional Advection Equation Using PyTorch [0.0]
  PINNs approach allows training neural networks while respecting the PDEs as a strong constraint in the optimization. In standard small-scale circulation simulations, it is shown that the conventional approach incorporates a pseudo diffusive effect that is almost as large as the effect of the turbulent diffusion model. Of all the schemes tested, only the PINNs approximation accurately predicted the outcome.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T05:39:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.