Deep Algorithmic Question Answering: Towards a Compositionally Hybrid AI
for Algorithmic Reasoning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08006v1
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 14:28:18 GMT
- Title: Deep Algorithmic Question Answering: Towards a Compositionally Hybrid AI
for Algorithmic Reasoning
- Authors: Kwwabena Nuamah
- Abstract summary: We argue that the challenge of algorithmic reasoning in question answering can be effectively tackled with a "systems" approach to AI.
We propose an approach to algorithm reasoning for QA, Deep Algorithmic Question Answering.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: An important aspect of artificial intelligence (AI) is the ability to reason
in a step-by-step "algorithmic" manner that can be inspected and verified for
its correctness. This is especially important in the domain of question
answering (QA). We argue that the challenge of algorithmic reasoning in QA can
be effectively tackled with a "systems" approach to AI which features a hybrid
use of symbolic and sub-symbolic methods including deep neural networks.
Additionally, we argue that while neural network models with end-to-end
training pipelines perform well in narrow applications such as image
classification and language modelling, they cannot, on their own, successfully
perform algorithmic reasoning, especially if the task spans multiple domains.
We discuss a few notable exceptions and point out how they are still limited
when the QA problem is widened to include other intelligence-requiring tasks.
However, deep learning, and machine learning in general, do play important
roles as components in the reasoning process. We propose an approach to
algorithm reasoning for QA, Deep Algorithmic Question Answering (DAQA), based
on three desirable properties: interpretability, generalizability and
robustness which such an AI system should possess and conclude that they are
best achieved with a combination of hybrid and compositional AI.
Related papers
- Do great minds think alike? Investigating Human-AI Complementarity in Question Answering with CAIMIRA [43.116608441891096]
Humans outperform AI systems in knowledge-grounded abductive and conceptual reasoning.
State-of-the-art LLMs like GPT-4 and LLaMA show superior performance on targeted information retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-09T03:53:26Z) - Efficient Parallel Multi-Hop Reasoning: A Scalable Approach for Knowledge Graph Analysis [0.0]
Multi-hop reasoning (MHR) is a critical function in various applications.
This paper focuses on optimizing MHR for time efficiency on large-scale graphs.
We introduce a novel parallel algorithm that harnesses domain-specific learned embeddings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T21:12:34Z) - Cognition is All You Need -- The Next Layer of AI Above Large Language
Models [0.0]
We present Cognitive AI, a framework for neurosymbolic cognition outside of large language models.
We propose that Cognitive AI is a necessary precursor for the evolution of the forms of AI, such as AGI, and specifically claim that AGI cannot be achieved by probabilistic approaches on their own.
We conclude with a discussion of the implications for large language models, adoption cycles in AI, and commercial Cognitive AI development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-04T16:11:57Z) - Mathematical Algorithm Design for Deep Learning under Societal and
Judicial Constraints: The Algorithmic Transparency Requirement [65.26723285209853]
We derive a framework to analyze whether a transparent implementation in a computing model is feasible.
Based on previous results, we find that Blum-Shub-Smale Machines have the potential to establish trustworthy solvers for inverse problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-18T15:32:38Z) - Brain-Inspired Computational Intelligence via Predictive Coding [89.6335791546526]
Predictive coding (PC) has shown promising performance in machine intelligence tasks.
PC can model information processing in different brain areas, can be used in cognitive control and robotics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-15T16:37:16Z) - The Clock and the Pizza: Two Stories in Mechanistic Explanation of
Neural Networks [59.26515696183751]
We show that algorithm discovery in neural networks is sometimes more complex.
We show that even simple learning problems can admit a surprising diversity of solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-30T17:59:13Z) - Utilizing Background Knowledge for Robust Reasoning over Traffic
Situations [63.45021731775964]
We focus on a complementary research aspect of Intelligent Transportation: traffic understanding.
We scope our study to text-based methods and datasets given the abundant commonsense knowledge.
We adopt three knowledge-driven approaches for zero-shot QA over traffic situations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-04T09:17:24Z) - On Explainability in AI-Solutions: A Cross-Domain Survey [4.394025678691688]
In automatically deriving a system model, AI algorithms learn relations in data that are not detectable for humans.
The more complex a model, the more difficult it is for a human to understand the reasoning for the decisions.
This work provides an extensive survey of literature on this topic, which, to a large part, consists of other surveys.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-11T06:21:47Z) - End-to-end Algorithm Synthesis with Recurrent Networks: Logical
Extrapolation Without Overthinking [52.05847268235338]
We show how machine learning systems can perform logical extrapolation without overthinking problems.
We propose a recall architecture that keeps an explicit copy of the problem instance in memory so that it cannot be forgotten.
We also employ a progressive training routine that prevents the model from learning behaviors that are specific to number and instead pushes it to learn behaviors that can be repeated indefinitely.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-11T18:43:28Z) - Question Answering over Knowledge Bases by Leveraging Semantic Parsing
and Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning [73.00049753292316]
We propose a semantic parsing and reasoning-based Neuro-Symbolic Question Answering(NSQA) system.
NSQA achieves state-of-the-art performance on QALD-9 and LC-QuAD 1.0.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-03T05:17:55Z) - Problems in AI research and how the SP System may help to solve them [0.0]
This paper describes problems in AI research and how the SP System may help to solve them.
Most of the problems are described by leading researchers in AI in interviews with science writer Martin Ford.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-02T11:33:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.