Problems in AI research and how the SP System may help to solve them
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.09079v3
- Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 16:30:22 GMT
- Title: Problems in AI research and how the SP System may help to solve them
- Authors: J Gerard Wolff
- Abstract summary: This paper describes problems in AI research and how the SP System may help to solve them.
Most of the problems are described by leading researchers in AI in interviews with science writer Martin Ford.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This paper describes problems in AI research and how the SP System (described
in an appendix) may help to solve them. Most of the problems are described by
leading researchers in AI in interviews with science writer Martin Ford, and
reported by him in his book {\em Architects of Intelligence}. These problems
are: the need to bridge the divide between symbolic and non-symbolic kinds of
knowledge and processing; the tendency of deep neural networks (DNNs) to make
large and unexpected errors in recognition; the need to strengthen the
representation and processing of natural languages; the challenges of
unsupervised learning; the need for a coherent account of generalisation; how
to learn usable knowledge from a single exposure; how to achieve transfer
learning; how to increase the efficiency of AI processing; the need for
transparency in AI structures and processes; how to achieve varieties of
probabilistic reasoning; the need for more emphasis on top-down strategies; how
to minimise the risk of accidents with self-driving vehicles; the need for
strong compositionality in AI knowledge; the challenges of commonsense
reasoning and commonsense knowledge; establishing the importance of information
compression in AI research; establishing the importance of a biological
perspective in AI research; establishing whether knowledge in the brain is
represented in `distributed' or `localist' form; how to bypassing the limited
scope for adaptation in deep neural networks; the need to develop `broad AI';
and how to eliminate the problem of catastrophic forgetting.
Related papers
- Cognition is All You Need -- The Next Layer of AI Above Large Language
Models [0.0]
We present Cognitive AI, a framework for neurosymbolic cognition outside of large language models.
We propose that Cognitive AI is a necessary precursor for the evolution of the forms of AI, such as AGI, and specifically claim that AGI cannot be achieved by probabilistic approaches on their own.
We conclude with a discussion of the implications for large language models, adoption cycles in AI, and commercial Cognitive AI development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-04T16:11:57Z) - Advancing Explainable AI Toward Human-Like Intelligence: Forging the
Path to Artificial Brain [0.7770029179741429]
The intersection of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and neuroscience in Explainable AI (XAI) is pivotal for enhancing transparency and interpretability in complex decision-making processes.
This paper explores the evolution of XAI methodologies, ranging from feature-based to human-centric approaches.
The challenges in achieving explainability in generative models, ensuring responsible AI practices, and addressing ethical implications are discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-07T14:09:11Z) - Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic
Systems [67.01132165581667]
We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components.
We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z) - Trust, Accountability, and Autonomy in Knowledge Graph-based AI for
Self-determination [1.4305544869388402]
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) have emerged as fundamental platforms for powering intelligent decision-making.
The integration of KGs with neuronal learning is currently a topic of active research.
This paper conceptualises the foundational topics and research pillars to support KG-based AI for self-determination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T12:51:52Z) - Towards Reconciling Usability and Usefulness of Explainable AI
Methodologies [2.715884199292287]
Black-box AI systems can lead to liability and accountability issues when they produce an incorrect decision.
Explainable AI (XAI) seeks to bridge the knowledge gap, between developers and end-users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-13T01:08:49Z) - From Psychological Curiosity to Artificial Curiosity: Curiosity-Driven
Learning in Artificial Intelligence Tasks [56.20123080771364]
Psychological curiosity plays a significant role in human intelligence to enhance learning through exploration and information acquisition.
In the Artificial Intelligence (AI) community, artificial curiosity provides a natural intrinsic motivation for efficient learning.
CDL has become increasingly popular, where agents are self-motivated to learn novel knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-20T17:07:03Z) - A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in
Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect.
The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z) - Deep Algorithmic Question Answering: Towards a Compositionally Hybrid AI
for Algorithmic Reasoning [0.0]
We argue that the challenge of algorithmic reasoning in question answering can be effectively tackled with a "systems" approach to AI.
We propose an approach to algorithm reasoning for QA, Deep Algorithmic Question Answering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-16T14:28:18Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - Empowering Things with Intelligence: A Survey of the Progress,
Challenges, and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence of Things [98.10037444792444]
We show how AI can empower the IoT to make it faster, smarter, greener, and safer.
First, we present progress in AI research for IoT from four perspectives: perceiving, learning, reasoning, and behaving.
Finally, we summarize some promising applications of AIoT that are likely to profoundly reshape our world.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-17T13:14:28Z) - A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented.
This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.