Optimal Ensemble Construction for Multi-Study Prediction with
Applications to COVID-19 Excess Mortality Estimation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09164v1
- Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 16:52:41 GMT
- Title: Optimal Ensemble Construction for Multi-Study Prediction with
Applications to COVID-19 Excess Mortality Estimation
- Authors: Gabriel Loewinger, Rolando Acosta Nunez, Rahul Mazumder and Giovanni
Parmigiani
- Abstract summary: Multi-study ensembling uses a two-stage strategy which fits study-specific models and estimates ensemble weights separately.
This approach ignores the ensemble properties at the model-fitting stage, potentially resulting in a loss of efficiency.
We show that when little data is available for a country before the onset of the pandemic, leveraging data from other countries can substantially improve prediction accuracy.
- Score: 7.02598981483736
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: It is increasingly common to encounter prediction tasks in the biomedical
sciences for which multiple datasets are available for model training. Common
approaches such as pooling datasets and applying standard statistical learning
methods can result in poor out-of-study prediction performance when datasets
are heterogeneous. Theoretical and applied work has shown $\textit{multi-study
ensembling}$ to be a viable alternative that leverages the variability across
datasets in a manner that promotes model generalizability. Multi-study
ensembling uses a two-stage $\textit{stacking}$ strategy which fits
study-specific models and estimates ensemble weights separately. This approach
ignores, however, the ensemble properties at the model-fitting stage,
potentially resulting in a loss of efficiency. We therefore propose
$\textit{optimal ensemble construction}$, an $\textit{all-in-one}$ approach to
multi-study stacking whereby we jointly estimate ensemble weights as well as
parameters associated with each study-specific model. We prove that limiting
cases of our approach yield existing methods such as multi-study stacking and
pooling datasets before model fitting. We propose an efficient block coordinate
descent algorithm to optimize the proposed loss function. We compare our
approach to standard methods by applying it to a multi-country COVID-19 dataset
for baseline mortality prediction. We show that when little data is available
for a country before the onset of the pandemic, leveraging data from other
countries can substantially improve prediction accuracy. Importantly, our
approach outperforms multi-study stacking and other standard methods in this
application. We further characterize the method's performance in data-driven
and other simulations. Our method remains competitive with or outperforms
multi-study stacking and other earlier methods across a range of between-study
heterogeneity levels.
Related papers
- Ranking and Combining Latent Structured Predictive Scores without Labeled Data [2.5064967708371553]
This paper introduces a novel structured unsupervised ensemble learning model (SUEL)
It exploits the dependency between a set of predictors with continuous predictive scores, rank the predictors without labeled data and combine them to an ensembled score with weights.
The efficacy of the proposed methods is rigorously assessed through both simulation studies and real-world application of risk genes discovery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-14T20:14:42Z) - Multiply Robust Estimation for Local Distribution Shifts with Multiple Domains [9.429772474335122]
We focus on scenarios where data distributions vary across multiple segments of the entire population.
We propose a two-stage multiply robust estimation method to improve model performance on each individual segment.
Our method is designed to be implemented with commonly used off-the-shelf machine learning models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T22:01:10Z) - Improved Distribution Matching for Dataset Condensation [91.55972945798531]
We propose a novel dataset condensation method based on distribution matching.
Our simple yet effective method outperforms most previous optimization-oriented methods with much fewer computational resources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-19T04:07:33Z) - On the Trade-off of Intra-/Inter-class Diversity for Supervised
Pre-training [72.8087629914444]
We study the impact of the trade-off between the intra-class diversity (the number of samples per class) and the inter-class diversity (the number of classes) of a supervised pre-training dataset.
With the size of the pre-training dataset fixed, the best downstream performance comes with a balance on the intra-/inter-class diversity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-20T16:23:50Z) - HyperImpute: Generalized Iterative Imputation with Automatic Model
Selection [77.86861638371926]
We propose a generalized iterative imputation framework for adaptively and automatically configuring column-wise models.
We provide a concrete implementation with out-of-the-box learners, simulators, and interfaces.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-15T19:10:35Z) - On Modality Bias Recognition and Reduction [70.69194431713825]
We study the modality bias problem in the context of multi-modal classification.
We propose a plug-and-play loss function method, whereby the feature space for each label is adaptively learned.
Our method yields remarkable performance improvements compared with the baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-25T13:47:09Z) - Selecting the suitable resampling strategy for imbalanced data
classification regarding dataset properties [62.997667081978825]
In many application domains such as medicine, information retrieval, cybersecurity, social media, etc., datasets used for inducing classification models often have an unequal distribution of the instances of each class.
This situation, known as imbalanced data classification, causes low predictive performance for the minority class examples.
Oversampling and undersampling techniques are well-known strategies to deal with this problem by balancing the number of examples of each class.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-15T18:56:39Z) - Deep Learning with Multiple Data Set: A Weighted Goal Programming
Approach [2.7393821783237184]
Large-scale data analysis is growing at an exponential rate as data proliferates in our societies.
Deep Learning models require plenty of resources, and distributed training is needed.
This paper presents a Multicriteria approach for distributed learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-27T07:10:25Z) - Distributed Learning of Finite Gaussian Mixtures [21.652015112462]
We study split-and-conquer approaches for the distributed learning of finite Gaussian mixtures.
New estimator is shown to be consistent and retains root-n consistency under some general conditions.
Experiments based on simulated and real-world data show that the proposed split-and-conquer approach has comparable statistical performance with the global estimator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-20T16:17:47Z) - StackGenVis: Alignment of Data, Algorithms, and Models for Stacking Ensemble Learning Using Performance Metrics [4.237343083490243]
In machine learning (ML), ensemble methods such as bagging, boosting, and stacking are widely-established approaches.
StackGenVis is a visual analytics system for stacked generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-04T15:43:55Z) - Meta-Learned Confidence for Few-shot Learning [60.6086305523402]
A popular transductive inference technique for few-shot metric-based approaches, is to update the prototype of each class with the mean of the most confident query examples.
We propose to meta-learn the confidence for each query sample, to assign optimal weights to unlabeled queries.
We validate our few-shot learning model with meta-learned confidence on four benchmark datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-27T10:22:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.