Lack of Value Definiteness in Quantum Gravity
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.10339v1
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 17:47:01 GMT
- Title: Lack of Value Definiteness in Quantum Gravity
- Authors: Enrico Cinti, Cristian Mariani, Marco Sanchioni
- Abstract summary: We show in both Loop Quantum Gravity and in String Theory, these observables are non-commuting ones.
We propose to interpret these physical quantities as ontologically indeterminate -- i.e., indeterminate in a non-epistemic, mind-independent way.
This result has two important consequences for current debates in philosophy of physics.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In this paper we consider the observables describing fundamental
spatiotemporal properties and relations in the context of Quantum Gravity (QG).
As we will show, in both Loop Quantum Gravity and in String Theory, these
observables are non-commuting ones. By analogy with some recent arguments put
forward in the context of non-relativistic quantum mechanics (QM), we shall
propose to interpret these physical quantities as ontologically indeterminate
-- i.e., indeterminate in a non-epistemic, mind-independent way. This result
has two important consequences for current debates in philosophy of physics.
First, it shows that ontological indeterminacy may extend well beyond the
non-relativistic case, thereby also suggesting a conceptual continuity between
QM and QG. Second, when applied to QG, the notion of indeterminacy may provide
a unified philosophical framework for understanding very distinct approaches
that are usually considered incompatible.
Related papers
- Equivalence Relations in Quantum Theory: An Objective Account of Bases and Factorizations [0.0]
In orthodox Standard Quantum Mechanics (SQM) bases and factorizations are considered to define quantum states and entanglement in relativistic terms.
We provide an invariant account of bases and factorizations which allows us to build a conceptual-operational bridge between formalism and quantum phenomena.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-23T10:17:49Z) - Rules and Meaning in Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
It pursues an investigation at an intersection of the philosophy of physics and the philosophy of semantics.
It offers a critical analysis of rival explanations of the semantic facts of standard QM.
New results include 1) a reconstruction of Einstein's incompleteness argument, which concludes that a local, separable, and categorical QM cannot exist.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T07:14:16Z) - Causal nonseparability and its implications for spatiotemporal relations [0.0]
This work investigates the philosophical implications of causal nonseparability, especially for the notion oftemporal relations.
A preliminary discussion will study the formal connection between quantum and causal nonseparability.
It will be shown that, depending on the interpretative framework, causal nonseparability suggests some kind of indeterminacy oftemporal relations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-20T15:32:46Z) - Correspondence Between the Energy Equipartition Theorem in Classical
Mechanics and its Phase-Space Formulation in Quantum Mechanics [62.997667081978825]
In quantum mechanics, the energy per degree of freedom is not equally distributed.
We show that in the high-temperature regime, the classical result is recovered.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-24T20:51:03Z) - Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory.
We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z) - Qubits are not observers -- a no-go theorem [0.0]
The relational approach to quantum states asserts that the physical description of quantum systems is always relative to something or someone.
We show, in the form of a no-go theorem, that in RQM the physical description of a system relative to an observer cannot represent knowledge about the observer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T22:48:16Z) - Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same.
Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles.
We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z) - Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world.
We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z) - Understanding Quantum Mechanics (Beyond Metaphysical Dogmatism and Naive
Empiricism) [0.0]
We will argue that the reason behind the impossibility to reach a meaningful answer to this question is strictly related to the 20th Century Bohrian-positivist re-foundation of physics.
We will also argue that the possibility of understanding QM is at plain sight, given we return to the original framework of physics in which the meaning of understanding has always been clear.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-01T14:40:44Z) - Unraveling the topology of dissipative quantum systems [58.720142291102135]
We discuss topology in dissipative quantum systems from the perspective of quantum trajectories.
We show for a broad family of translation-invariant collapse models that the set of dark state-inducing Hamiltonians imposes a nontrivial topological structure on the space of Hamiltonians.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-12T11:26:02Z) - Preferred basis, decoherence and a quantum state of the Universe [77.34726150561087]
We review a number of issues in foundations of quantum theory and quantum cosmology.
These issues can be considered as a part of the scientific legacy of H.D. Zeh.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-28T18:07:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.