Understanding Quantum Mechanics (Beyond Metaphysical Dogmatism and Naive Empiricism)

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.00487v1
• Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:40:44 GMT
• Title: Understanding Quantum Mechanics (Beyond Metaphysical Dogmatism and Naive Empiricism)
• Authors: Christian de Ronde
• Abstract summary: We will argue that the reason behind the impossibility to reach a meaningful answer to this question is strictly related to the 20th Century Bohrian-positivist re-foundation of physics. We will also argue that the possibility of understanding QM is at plain sight, given we return to the original framework of physics in which the meaning of understanding has always been clear.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Quantum Mechanics (QM) has faced deep controversies and debates since its origin when Werner Heisenberg proposed the first mathematical formalism capable to operationally account for what had been recently discovered as the new field of quantum phenomena. Today, even though we have reached a standardized version of QM which is taught in Universities all around the world, there is still no consensus regarding the conceptual reference of the theory and, if or if not, it can refer to something beyond measurement outcomes. In this work we will argue that the reason behind the impossibility to reach a meaningful answer to this question is strictly related to the 20th Century Bohrian-positivist re-foundation of physics which is responsible for having introduced within the theory of quanta a harmful combination of metaphysical dogmatism and naive empiricism. We will also argue that the possibility of understanding QM is at plain sight, given we return to the original framework of physics in which the meaning of understanding has always been clear.

Related papers

• The physics and metaphysics of the conceptuality interpretation of quantum mechanics [0.0]
  It has been argued that the difficulty in understanding quantum theory is our failed attempt to force onto it a wrong conceptual scheme. Many thinkers have suggested that we must surrender to the fact that our physical world is one of immanent powers and potencies. However, if on the one hand a potentiality puts the accent on the processes of change, responsible for the incessant shifts between actual and potential properties, on the other hand it does not tell what these changes are all about.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T10:00:49Z)
• Postulating the Unicity of the Macroscopic Physical World [0.0]
  We argue that the unicity of the macroscopic world is a fundamental postulate of physics, rather than an issue that must be mathematically justified or demonstrated. This is made possible by using general operator algebras to extend the mathematical description of the physical world towards macroscopic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T19:21:36Z)
• Unraveling the Mystery of Quantum Measurement with A New Space-Time Approach to Relativistic Quantum Mechanics [9.116661570248171]
  Quantum measurement is a fundamental concept in the field of quantum mechanics. Despite its significance, four fundamental issues continue to pose significant challenges to the broader application of quantum measurement. We employ a new space-time approach to relativistic quantum mechanics to address these issues systematically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T13:25:08Z)
• Correspondence Between the Energy Equipartition Theorem in Classical Mechanics and its Phase-Space Formulation in Quantum Mechanics [62.997667081978825]
  In quantum mechanics, the energy per degree of freedom is not equally distributed. We show that in the high-temperature regime, the classical result is recovered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T20:51:03Z)
• The relational ontology of contemporary physics [0.0]
  Quantum theory can be understood as pointing to an ontology of relations. I observe that this reading of quantum mechanics is supported by the ubiquity of relationality in contemporary fundamental physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-03T23:30:08Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• One-shot quantum error correction of classical and quantum information [10.957528713294874]
  Quantum error correction (QEC) is one of the central concepts in quantum information science. We provide a form of capacity theorem for both classical and quantum information. We show that a demonstration of QEC by short random quantum circuits is feasible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T01:24:59Z)
• Measuring Quantum Superpositions (Or, "It is only the theory which decides what can be observed.") [0.0]
  We argue that the ad hoc introduction of the projection postulate (or measurement rule) can be understood as a necessary requirement coming from a naive empiricist standpoint. We discuss the general physical conditions for measuring and observing quantum superpositions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-02T14:30:56Z)
• Preferred basis, decoherence and a quantum state of the Universe [77.34726150561087]
  We review a number of issues in foundations of quantum theory and quantum cosmology. These issues can be considered as a part of the scientific legacy of H.D. Zeh.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T18:07:59Z)
• From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
  We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover. The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z)
• The (Quantum) Measurement Problem in Classical Mechanics [0.0]
  We show why this is not an "obvious" nor "self evident" problem for the theory of quanta. We discuss a representational realist account of both physical 'theories' and'measurement' We show how through these same set of presuppositions it is easy to derive a completely analogous paradox for the case of classical mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-01T17:07:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.