Optimization-based Causal Estimation from Heterogenous Environments
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.11990v4
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 18:46:28 GMT
- Title: Optimization-based Causal Estimation from Heterogenous Environments
- Authors: Mingzhang Yin, Yixin Wang, David M. Blei,
- Abstract summary: CoCo is an optimization algorithm that bridges the gap between pure prediction and causal inference.
We describe the theoretical foundations of this approach and demonstrate its effectiveness on simulated and real datasets.
- Score: 35.74340459207312
- License:
- Abstract: This paper presents a new optimization approach to causal estimation. Given data that contains covariates and an outcome, which covariates are causes of the outcome, and what is the strength of the causality? In classical machine learning (ML), the goal of optimization is to maximize predictive accuracy. However, some covariates might exhibit a non-causal association with the outcome. Such spurious associations provide predictive power for classical ML, but they prevent us from causally interpreting the result. This paper proposes CoCo, an optimization algorithm that bridges the gap between pure prediction and causal inference. CoCo leverages the recently-proposed idea of environments, datasets of covariates/response where the causal relationships remain invariant but where the distribution of the covariates changes from environment to environment. Given datasets from multiple environments-and ones that exhibit sufficient heterogeneity-CoCo maximizes an objective for which the only solution is the causal solution. We describe the theoretical foundations of this approach and demonstrate its effectiveness on simulated and real datasets. Compared to classical ML and existing methods, CoCo provides more accurate estimates of the causal model and more accurate predictions under interventions.
Related papers
- Causal Invariance Learning via Efficient Optimization of a Nonconvex Objective [12.423111378195667]
We propose a novel method for finding causal relationships among variables.
We show that our method converges to a standard gradient method.
Our algorithm avoids exhaustive searches, making it especially when the number of covariants is large.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-16T15:11:02Z) - Statistical ranking with dynamic covariates [6.729750785106628]
We introduce an efficient alternating algorithm to compute the likelihood estimator (MLE)
A comprehensive numerical study is conducted to corroborate our theoretical findings and demonstrate the application of the proposed model to real-world datasets, including horse racing and tennis competitions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T10:26:05Z) - Learning When the Concept Shifts: Confounding, Invariance, and Dimension Reduction [5.38274042816001]
In observational data, the distribution shift is often driven by unobserved confounding factors.
This motivates us to study the domain adaptation problem with observational data.
We show a model that uses the learned lower-dimensional subspace can incur nearly ideal gap between target and source risk.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-22T17:43:08Z) - Tackling Prevalent Conditions in Unsupervised Combinatorial Optimization: Cardinality, Minimum, Covering, and More [28.920691288421484]
We aim to tackle prevalent (i.e., commonly involved) conditions in unsupervised CO.
First, we concretize the targets for objective construction and derandomization with theoretical justification.
Then, for various conditions commonly involved in different CO problems, we derive nontrivial objectives and derandomization to meet the targets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-14T08:35:39Z) - Efficient adjustment for complex covariates: Gaining efficiency with
DOPE [56.537164957672715]
We propose a framework that accommodates adjustment for any subset of information expressed by the covariates.
Based on our theoretical results, we propose the Debiased Outcome-adapted Propensity Estorimator (DOPE) for efficient estimation of the average treatment effect (ATE)
Our results show that the DOPE provides an efficient and robust methodology for ATE estimation in various observational settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T13:02:51Z) - TIC-TAC: A Framework for Improved Covariance Estimation in Deep Heteroscedastic Regression [109.69084997173196]
Deepscedastic regression involves jointly optimizing the mean and covariance of the predicted distribution using the negative log-likelihood.
Recent works show that this may result in sub-optimal convergence due to the challenges associated with covariance estimation.
We study two questions: (1) Does the predicted covariance truly capture the randomness of the predicted mean?
Our results show that not only does TIC accurately learn the covariance, it additionally facilitates an improved convergence of the negative log-likelihood.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-29T09:54:03Z) - Does Misclassifying Non-confounding Covariates as Confounders Affect the
Causal Inference within the Potential Outcomes Framework? [4.074237603319893]
The Potential Outcome Framework (POF) plays a prominent role in the field of causal inference.
We present a unified graphical framework for the CIMs-POF, which greatly enhances the comprehension of these models' underlying principles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-22T13:18:13Z) - Cauchy-Schwarz Regularized Autoencoder [68.80569889599434]
Variational autoencoders (VAE) are a powerful and widely-used class of generative models.
We introduce a new constrained objective based on the Cauchy-Schwarz divergence, which can be computed analytically for GMMs.
Our objective improves upon variational auto-encoding models in density estimation, unsupervised clustering, semi-supervised learning, and face analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-06T17:36:26Z) - Latent Causal Invariant Model [128.7508609492542]
Current supervised learning can learn spurious correlation during the data-fitting process.
We propose a Latent Causal Invariance Model (LaCIM) which pursues causal prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-04T10:00:27Z) - Invariant Rationalization [84.1861516092232]
A typical rationalization criterion, i.e. maximum mutual information (MMI), finds the rationale that maximizes the prediction performance based only on the rationale.
We introduce a game-theoretic invariant rationalization criterion where the rationales are constrained to enable the same predictor to be optimal across different environments.
We show both theoretically and empirically that the proposed rationales can rule out spurious correlations, generalize better to different test scenarios, and align better with human judgments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-22T00:50:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.