Deep Reinforcement Learning Versus Evolution Strategies: A Comparative Survey

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.01411v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 18:45:30 GMT
• Title: Deep Reinforcement Learning Versus Evolution Strategies: A Comparative Survey
• Authors: Amjad Yousef Majid, Serge Saaybi, Tomas van Rietbergen, Vincent Francois-Lavet, R Venkatesha Prasad, Chris Verhoeven
• Abstract summary: Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) and Evolution Strategies (ESs) have surpassed human-level control in many sequential decision-making problems. To get insights into the strengths and weaknesses of DRL versus ESs, an analysis of their respective capabilities and limitations is provided.
• Score: 2.554326189662943
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) and Evolution Strategies (ESs) have surpassed human-level control in many sequential decision-making problems, yet many open challenges still exist. To get insights into the strengths and weaknesses of DRL versus ESs, an analysis of their respective capabilities and limitations is provided. After presenting their fundamental concepts and algorithms, a comparison is provided on key aspects such as scalability, exploration, adaptation to dynamic environments, and multi-agent learning. Then, the benefits of hybrid algorithms that combine concepts from DRL and ESs are highlighted. Finally, to have an indication about how they compare in real-world applications, a survey of the literature for the set of applications they support is provided.

Related papers

• A Survey on Explainable Deep Reinforcement Learning [18.869827229746697]
  Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has achieved remarkable success in sequential decision-making tasks across diverse domains. Its reliance on black-box neural architectures hinders interpretability, trust, and deployment in high-stakes applications. Explainable Deep Reinforcement Learning (XRL) addresses these challenges by enhancing transparency through feature-level, state-level, dataset-level, and model-level explanation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T05:30:31Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Reinforcement Learning: From Algorithms to Practical Challenges [2.2448567386846916]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm in Artificial Intelligence (AI) This paper presents a comprehensive survey of RL, meticulously analyzing a wide range of algorithms. We offer practical insights into the selection and implementation of RL algorithms, addressing common challenges like convergence, stability, and the exploration-exploitation dilemma.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T03:53:14Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Underwater Image Enhancement Based on Deep Learning [51.7818820745221]
  Underwater image enhancement (UIE) presents a significant challenge within computer vision research. Despite the development of numerous UIE algorithms, a thorough and systematic review is still absent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T04:46:40Z)
• Bridging Evolutionary Algorithms and Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Survey on Hybrid Algorithms [50.91348344666895]
  Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning (ERL) integrates Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) for optimization. This survey offers a comprehensive overview of the diverse research branches in ERL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T14:06:37Z)
• Reinforcement Learning-assisted Evolutionary Algorithm: A Survey and Research Opportunities [63.258517066104446]
  Reinforcement learning integrated as a component in the evolutionary algorithm has demonstrated superior performance in recent years. We discuss the RL-EA integration method, the RL-assisted strategy adopted by RL-EA, and its applications according to the existing literature. In the applications of RL-EA section, we also demonstrate the excellent performance of RL-EA on several benchmarks and a range of public datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T15:06:05Z)
• Ensemble Reinforcement Learning: A Survey [43.17635633600716]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a highly effective technique for addressing various scientific and applied problems. In response, ensemble reinforcement learning (ERL), a promising approach that combines the benefits of both RL and ensemble learning (EL), has gained widespread popularity. ERL leverages multiple models or training algorithms to comprehensively explore the problem space and possesses strong generalization capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-05T09:26:44Z)
• A Survey on Offline Reinforcement Learning: Taxonomy, Review, and Open Problems [0.0]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has experienced a dramatic increase in popularity. There is still a wide range of domains inaccessible to RL due to the high cost and danger of interacting with the environment. offline RL is a paradigm that learns exclusively from static datasets of previously collected interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-02T20:05:11Z)
• Policy Information Capacity: Information-Theoretic Measure for Task Complexity in Deep Reinforcement Learning [83.66080019570461]
  We propose two environment-agnostic, algorithm-agnostic quantitative metrics for task difficulty. We show that these metrics have higher correlations with normalized task solvability scores than a variety of alternatives. These metrics can also be used for fast and compute-efficient optimizations of key design parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T17:49:50Z)
• SUNRISE: A Simple Unified Framework for Ensemble Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning [102.78958681141577]
  We present SUNRISE, a simple unified ensemble method, which is compatible with various off-policy deep reinforcement learning algorithms. SUNRISE integrates two key ingredients: (a) ensemble-based weighted Bellman backups, which re-weight target Q-values based on uncertainty estimates from a Q-ensemble, and (b) an inference method that selects actions using the highest upper-confidence bounds for efficient exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-09T17:08:44Z)
• What Matters In On-Policy Reinforcement Learning? A Large-Scale Empirical Study [50.79125250286453]
  On-policy reinforcement learning (RL) has been successfully applied to many different continuous control tasks. But state-of-the-art implementations take numerous low- and high-level design decisions that strongly affect the performance of the resulting agents. These choices are usually not extensively discussed in the literature, leading to discrepancy between published descriptions of algorithms and their implementations. We implement >50 such choices'' in a unified on-policy RL framework, allowing us to investigate their impact in a large-scale empirical study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T17:59:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.