Error metric for non-trace-preserving quantum operations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02290v5
• Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2023 19:02:00 GMT
• Title: Error metric for non-trace-preserving quantum operations
• Authors: Yu Shi, Edo Waks
• Abstract summary: We study the problem of measuring errors in non-trace-preserving quantum operations. We propose an error metric that efficiently provides an upper bound on the trace distance between the normalized output states.
• Score: 3.6492255655113395
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We study the problem of measuring errors in non-trace-preserving quantum operations, with a focus on their impact on quantum computing. We propose an error metric that efficiently provides an upper bound on the trace distance between the normalized output states from imperfect and ideal operations, while remaining compatible with the diamond distance. As a demonstration of its application, we apply our metric in the analysis of a lossy beam splitter and a nondeterministic conditional sign-flip gate, two primary non-trace-preserving operations in the Knill-Laflamme-Milburn protocol. We then turn to the leakage errors of neutral-atom quantum computers, finding that these errors scale worse than previously anticipated, implying a more stringent fault-tolerant threshold. We also assess the quantum Zeno gate's error using our metric. In a broader context, we discuss the potential of our metric to analyze general postselected protocols, where it can be employed to study error propagation and estimate thresholds in fault-tolerant quantum computing. The results highlight the critical role of our proposed error metric in understanding and addressing challenges in practical quantum information processing.

Related papers

• Measuring error rates of mid-circuit measurements [0.0]
  We introduce the first benchmarking protocol that measures the rate at which mid-circuit measurements induce errors in many-qubit circuits. We detect and eliminate previously undetected measurement-induced crosstalk in a 20-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer. We quantify how much of that error is eliminated by dynamical decoupling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T05:22:43Z)
• Bounding the systematic error in quantum error mitigation due to model violation [0.0]
  We develop a methodology to efficiently compute upper bounds on the impact of error-model inaccuracy in error mitigation. Our protocols require no additional experiments, and instead rely on comparisons between the error model and the error-learning data. We show that our estimated upper bounds are typically close to the worst observed performance of error mitigation on random circuits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T16:27:00Z)
• Efficient separate quantification of state preparation errors and measurement errors on quantum computers and their mitigation [0.5439020425819]
  Current noisy quantum computers have multiple types of errors, which can occur in the state preparation, measurement/readout, and gate operation. We propose a simple and resource-efficient approach to quantify separately the state preparation and readout error rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T02:51:06Z)
• Transition Role of Entangled Data in Quantum Machine Learning [51.6526011493678]
  Entanglement serves as the resource to empower quantum computing. Recent progress has highlighted its positive impact on learning quantum dynamics. We establish a quantum no-free-lunch (NFL) theorem for learning quantum dynamics using entangled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T08:06:43Z)
• Scalable evaluation of incoherent infidelity in quantum devices [0.0]
  We introduce the incoherent infidelity as a measure of incoherent errors. This method is applicable to generic quantum evolutions subjected to time-dependent Markovian noise. It provides an error quantifier for the target circuit, rather than an error averaged over many circuits or quantum gates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T19:03:42Z)
• Measuring NISQ Gate-Based Qubit Stability Using a 1+1 Field Theory and Cycle Benchmarking [50.8020641352841]
  We study coherent errors on a quantum hardware platform using a transverse field Ising model Hamiltonian as a sample user application. We identify inter-day and intra-day qubit calibration drift and the impacts of quantum circuit placement on groups of qubits in different physical locations on the processor. This paper also discusses how these measurements can provide a better understanding of these types of errors and how they may improve efforts to validate the accuracy of quantum computations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-08T23:12:55Z)
• Analytical and experimental study of center line miscalibrations in M\o lmer-S\o rensen gates [51.93099889384597]
  We study a systematic perturbative expansion in miscalibrated parameters of the Molmer-Sorensen entangling gate. We compute the gate evolution operator which allows us to obtain relevant key properties. We verify the predictions from our model by benchmarking them against measurements in a trapped-ion quantum processor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-10T10:56:16Z)
• Fault-tolerant parity readout on a shuttling-based trapped-ion quantum computer [64.47265213752996]
  We experimentally demonstrate a fault-tolerant weight-4 parity check measurement scheme. We achieve a flag-conditioned parity measurement single-shot fidelity of 93.2(2)%. The scheme is an essential building block in a broad class of stabilizer quantum error correction protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-13T20:08:04Z)
• Crosstalk Suppression for Fault-tolerant Quantum Error Correction with Trapped Ions [62.997667081978825]
  We present a study of crosstalk errors in a quantum-computing architecture based on a single string of ions confined by a radio-frequency trap, and manipulated by individually-addressed laser beams. This type of errors affects spectator qubits that, ideally, should remain unaltered during the application of single- and two-qubit quantum gates addressed at a different set of active qubits. We microscopically model crosstalk errors from first principles and present a detailed study showing the importance of using a coherent vs incoherent error modelling and, moreover, discuss strategies to actively suppress this crosstalk at the gate level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-21T14:20:40Z)
• Deterministic correction of qubit loss [48.43720700248091]
  Loss of qubits poses one of the fundamental obstacles towards large-scale and fault-tolerant quantum information processors. We experimentally demonstrate the implementation of a full cycle of qubit loss detection and correction on a minimal instance of a topological surface code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T19:48:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.