Causal Identification with Additive Noise Models: Quantifying the Effect of Noise

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.08087v1
• Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 13:28:33 GMT
• Title: Causal Identification with Additive Noise Models: Quantifying the Effect of Noise
• Authors: Benjamin Kap, Marharyta Aleksandrova, Thomas Engel
• Abstract summary: This work investigates the impact of different noise levels on the ability of Additive Noise Models to identify the direction of the causal relationship. We use an exhaustive range of models where the level of additive noise gradually changes from 1% to 10000% of the causes' noise level. The results of the experiments show that ANMs methods can fail to capture the true causal direction for some levels of noise.
• Score: 5.037636944933989
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, a lot of research has been conducted within the area of causal inference and causal learning. Many methods have been developed to identify the cause-effect pairs in models and have been successfully applied to observational real-world data to determine the direction of causal relationships. Yet in bivariate situations, causal discovery problems remain challenging. One class of such methods, that also allows tackling the bivariate case, is based on Additive Noise Models (ANMs). Unfortunately, one aspect of these methods has not received much attention until now: what is the impact of different noise levels on the ability of these methods to identify the direction of the causal relationship. This work aims to bridge this gap with the help of an empirical study. We test Regression with Subsequent Independence Test (RESIT) using an exhaustive range of models where the level of additive noise gradually changes from 1\% to 10000\% of the causes' noise level (the latter remains fixed). Additionally, the experiments in this work consider several different types of distributions as well as linear and non-linear models. The results of the experiments show that ANMs methods can fail to capture the true causal direction for some levels of noise.

Related papers

• Effective Causal Discovery under Identifiable Heteroscedastic Noise Model [45.98718860540588]
  Causal DAG learning has recently achieved promising performance in terms of both accuracy and efficiency. We propose a novel formulation for DAG learning that accounts for the variation in noise variance across variables and observations. We then propose an effective two-phase iterative DAG learning algorithm to address the increasing optimization difficulties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T08:51:58Z)
• Robust Estimation of Causal Heteroscedastic Noise Models [7.568978862189266]
  Student's $t$-distribution is known for its robustness in accounting for sampling variability with smaller sample sizes and extreme values without significantly altering the overall distribution shape. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that our estimators are more robust and achieve better overall performance across synthetic and real benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T02:26:35Z)
• Identifiable Latent Polynomial Causal Models Through the Lens of Change [82.14087963690561]
  Causal representation learning aims to unveil latent high-level causal representations from observed low-level data. One of its primary tasks is to provide reliable assurance of identifying these latent causal models, known as identifiability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T07:46:10Z)
• Comparative Study on the Effects of Noise in ML-Based Anxiety Detection [0.0]
  We study how noise impacts model performance and developing models that are robust to noisy, real-world conditions. We compare the effect of various intensities of noise on machine learning models classifying levels of physiological arousal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T19:52:24Z)
• Cause-Effect Inference in Location-Scale Noise Models: Maximum Likelihood vs. Independence Testing [19.23479356810746]
  A fundamental problem of causal discovery is cause-effect inference, learning the correct causal direction between two random variables. Recently introduced heteroscedastic location-scale noise functional models (LSNMs) combine expressive power with identifiability guarantees. We show that LSNM model selection based on maximizing likelihood achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, when the noise distributions are correctly specified.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T20:48:32Z)
• The role of noise in denoising models for anomaly detection in medical images [62.0532151156057]
  Pathological brain lesions exhibit diverse appearance in brain images. Unsupervised anomaly detection approaches have been proposed using only normal data for training. We show that optimization of the spatial resolution and magnitude of the noise improves the performance of different model training regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-19T21:39:38Z)
• Active Bayesian Causal Inference [72.70593653185078]
  We propose Active Bayesian Causal Inference (ABCI), a fully-Bayesian active learning framework for integrated causal discovery and reasoning. ABCI jointly infers a posterior over causal models and queries of interest. We show that our approach is more data-efficient than several baselines that only focus on learning the full causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T22:38:57Z)
• The Optimal Noise in Noise-Contrastive Learning Is Not What You Think [80.07065346699005]
  We show that deviating from this assumption can actually lead to better statistical estimators. In particular, the optimal noise distribution is different from the data's and even from a different family.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-02T13:59:20Z)
• Estimation of Bivariate Structural Causal Models by Variational Gaussian Process Regression Under Likelihoods Parametrised by Normalising Flows [74.85071867225533]
  Causal mechanisms can be described by structural causal models. One major drawback of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence is its lack of explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:52:58Z)
• The Effect of Noise Level on Causal Identification with Additive Noise Models [0.0]
  We consider the impact of different noise levels on the ability of Additive Noise Models to identify the direction of the causal relationship. Two specific methods have been selected, textitRegression with Subsequent Independence Test and textitIdentification using Conditional Variances The results of the experiments show that these methods can fail to capture the true causal direction for some levels of noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-24T11:18:41Z)
• Amortized Causal Discovery: Learning to Infer Causal Graphs from Time-Series Data [63.15776078733762]
  We propose Amortized Causal Discovery, a novel framework to learn to infer causal relations from time-series data. We demonstrate experimentally that this approach, implemented as a variational model, leads to significant improvements in causal discovery performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T19:59:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.