Adversarial robustness for latent models: Revisiting the robust-standard accuracies tradeoff

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.11950v1
• Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 17:58:27 GMT
• Title: Adversarial robustness for latent models: Revisiting the robust-standard accuracies tradeoff
• Authors: Adel Javanmard and Mohammad Mehrabi
• Abstract summary: adversarial training is often observed to drop the standard test accuracy. In this paper, we argue that this tradeoff is mitigated when the data enjoys a low-dimensional structure. We show that as the manifold dimension to the ambient dimension decreases, one can obtain models that are nearly optimal with respect to both, the standard accuracy and the robust accuracy measures.
• Score: 12.386462516398472
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Over the past few years, several adversarial training methods have been proposed to improve the robustness of machine learning models against adversarial perturbations in the input. Despite remarkable progress in this regard, adversarial training is often observed to drop the standard test accuracy. This phenomenon has intrigued the research community to investigate the potential tradeoff between standard and robust accuracy as two performance measures. In this paper, we revisit this tradeoff for latent models and argue that this tradeoff is mitigated when the data enjoys a low-dimensional structure. In particular, we consider binary classification under two data generative models, namely Gaussian mixture model and generalized linear model, where the feature data lie on a low-dimensional manifold. We show that as the manifold dimension to the ambient dimension decreases, one can obtain models that are nearly optimal with respect to both, the standard accuracy and the robust accuracy measures.

Related papers

• Calibrating Large Language Models with Sample Consistency [76.23956851098598]
  We explore the potential of deriving confidence from the distribution of multiple randomly sampled model generations, via three measures of consistency. Results show that consistency-based calibration methods outperform existing post-hoc approaches. We offer practical guidance on choosing suitable consistency metrics for calibration, tailored to the characteristics of various LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T16:15:20Z)
• The Surprising Harmfulness of Benign Overfitting for Adversarial Robustness [13.120373493503772]
  We prove a surprising result that even if the ground truth itself is robust to adversarial examples, the benignly overfitted model is benign in terms of the standard'' out-of-sample risk objective. Our finding provides theoretical insights into the puzzling phenomenon observed in practice, where the true target function (e.g., human) is robust against adverasrial attack, while beginly overfitted neural networks lead to models that are not robust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T15:40:46Z)
• Orthogonal Uncertainty Representation of Data Manifold for Robust Long-Tailed Learning [52.021899899683675]
  In scenarios with long-tailed distributions, the model's ability to identify tail classes is limited due to the under-representation of tail samples. We propose an Orthogonal Uncertainty Representation (OUR) of feature embedding and an end-to-end training strategy to improve the long-tail phenomenon of model robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T05:50:34Z)
• TWINS: A Fine-Tuning Framework for Improved Transferability of Adversarial Robustness and Generalization [89.54947228958494]
  This paper focuses on the fine-tuning of an adversarially pre-trained model in various classification tasks. We propose a novel statistics-based approach, Two-WIng NormliSation (TWINS) fine-tuning framework. TWINS is shown to be effective on a wide range of image classification datasets in terms of both generalization and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T14:12:55Z)
• CausalAgents: A Robustness Benchmark for Motion Forecasting using Causal Relationships [8.679073301435265]
  We construct a new benchmark for evaluating and improving model robustness by applying perturbations to existing data. We use these labels to perturb the data by deleting non-causal agents from the scene. Under non-causal perturbations, we observe a $25$-$38%$ relative change in minADE as compared to the original.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-07T21:28:23Z)
• Churn Reduction via Distillation [54.5952282395487]
  We show an equivalence between training with distillation using the base model as the teacher and training with an explicit constraint on the predictive churn. We then show that distillation performs strongly for low churn training against a number of recent baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-04T18:03:31Z)
• Anomaly Detection of Time Series with Smoothness-Inducing Sequential Variational Auto-Encoder [59.69303945834122]
  We present a Smoothness-Inducing Sequential Variational Auto-Encoder (SISVAE) model for robust estimation and anomaly detection of time series. Our model parameterizes mean and variance for each time-stamp with flexible neural networks. We show the effectiveness of our model on both synthetic datasets and public real-world benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-02T06:15:15Z)
• Asymptotic Behavior of Adversarial Training in Binary Classification [41.7567932118769]
  Adversarial training is considered to be the state-of-the-art method for defense against adversarial attacks. Despite being successful in practice, several problems in understanding performance of adversarial training remain open. We derive precise theoretical predictions for the minimization of adversarial training in binary classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T01:44:20Z)
• Precise Statistical Analysis of Classification Accuracies for Adversarial Training [43.25761725062367]
  A variety of recent adversarial training procedures have been proposed to remedy this issue. We derive a precise characterization of the standard and robust accuracy for a class of minimax adversarially trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-21T18:00:53Z)
• Revisiting Ensembles in an Adversarial Context: Improving Natural Accuracy [5.482532589225552]
  There is still a significant gap in natural accuracy between robust and non-robust models. We consider a number of ensemble methods designed to mitigate this performance difference. We consider two schemes, one that combines predictions from several randomly robust models, and the other that fuses features from robust and standard models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-26T15:45:58Z)
• Precise Tradeoffs in Adversarial Training for Linear Regression [55.764306209771405]
  We provide a precise and comprehensive understanding of the role of adversarial training in the context of linear regression with Gaussian features. We precisely characterize the standard/robust accuracy and the corresponding tradeoff achieved by a contemporary mini-max adversarial training approach. Our theory for adversarial training algorithms also facilitates the rigorous study of how a variety of factors (size and quality of training data, model overparametrization etc.) affect the tradeoff between these two competing accuracies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-24T19:01:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.