Analyzing Behavioral Changes of Twitter Users After Exposure to Misinformation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.00700v1
• Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 04:48:07 GMT
• Title: Analyzing Behavioral Changes of Twitter Users After Exposure to Misinformation
• Authors: Yichen Wang, Richard Han, Tamara Lehman, Qin Lv, and Shivakant Mishra
• Abstract summary: We aim to understand whether general Twitter users changed their behavior after being exposed to misinformation. We compare the before and after behavior of exposed users to determine whether the frequency of the tweets they posted underwent any significant change. We also study the characteristics of two specific user groups, multi-exposure and extreme change groups, which were potentially highly impacted.
• Score: 1.8251012479962594
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Social media platforms have been exploited to disseminate misinformation in recent years. The widespread online misinformation has been shown to affect users' beliefs and is connected to social impact such as polarization. In this work, we focus on misinformation's impact on specific user behavior and aim to understand whether general Twitter users changed their behavior after being exposed to misinformation. We compare the before and after behavior of exposed users to determine whether the frequency of the tweets they posted, or the sentiment of their tweets underwent any significant change. Our results indicate that users overall exhibited statistically significant changes in behavior across some of these metrics. Through language distance analysis, we show that exposed users were already different from baseline users before the exposure. We also study the characteristics of two specific user groups, multi-exposure and extreme change groups, which were potentially highly impacted. Finally, we study if the changes in the behavior of the users after exposure to misinformation tweets vary based on the number of their followers or the number of followers of the tweet authors, and find that their behavioral changes are all similar.

Related papers

• Anticipated versus Actual Effects of Platform Design Change: A Case Study of Twitter's Character Limit [17.925651625409678]
  We study Twitter's decision to double the character limit from 140 to 280 characters to soothe users' need to ''cram'' or ''squeeze'' their tweets. We find that even though users do not ''cram'' as much under 280 characters as they used to under 140 characters, emergent cramming'' at the new limit seems to not have been taken into account when designing the platform change.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-30T16:59:19Z)
• Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
  We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation. We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z)
• Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
  We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections. Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections. 75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z)
• SOK: Seeing and Believing: Evaluating the Trustworthiness of Twitter Users [4.609388510200741]
  Currently, there is no automated way of determining which news or users are credible and which are not. In this work, we created a model which analysed the behaviour of50,000 politicians on Twitter. We classified the political Twitter users as either trusted or untrusted using random forest, multilayer perceptron, and support vector machine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-16T17:39:32Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Causal Understanding of Fake News Dissemination on Social Media [50.4854427067898]
  We argue that it is critical to understand what user attributes potentially cause users to share fake news. In fake news dissemination, confounders can be characterized by fake news sharing behavior that inherently relates to user attributes and online activities. We propose a principled approach to alleviating selection bias in fake news dissemination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T19:37:04Z)
• Breaking the Communities: Characterizing community changing users using text mining and graph machine learning on Twitter [0.0]
  We study users who break their community on Twitter using natural language processing techniques and graph machine learning algorithms. We collected 9 million Twitter messages from 1.5 million users and constructed the retweet networks. We present a machine learning framework for social media users classification which detects "community breakers"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-24T23:44:51Z)
• Analyzing Twitter Users' Behavior Before and After Contact by the Internet Research Agency [0.771871917860264]
  Russian-backed Internet Research Agency has been identified as a key source of misinformation spread on Twitter prior to the 2016 U.S. presidential election. We compare the before and after behavior of contacted users to determine whether there were differences in their mean tweet count, the sentiment of their tweets, and the frequency and sentiment of tweets mentioning @realDonaldTrump or @HillaryClinton. Our results indicate that users overall exhibited statistically significant changes in behavior across most of these metrics, and that those users that engaged with the IRA generally showed greater changes in behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-04T02:04:17Z)
• Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment: the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
  This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic. We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content. Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.