Decoding Causality by Fictitious VAR Modeling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.07465v1
• Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 22:43:02 GMT
• Title: Decoding Causality by Fictitious VAR Modeling
• Authors: Xingwei Hu
• Abstract summary: We first set up an equilibrium for the cause-effect relations using a fictitious vector autoregressive model. In the equilibrium, long-run relations are identified from noise, and spurious ones are negligibly close to zero. We also apply the approach to estimating the causal factors' contribution to climate change.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In modeling multivariate time series for either forecast or policy analysis, it would be beneficial to have figured out the cause-effect relations within the data. Regression analysis, however, is generally for correlation relation, and very few researches have focused on variance analysis for causality discovery. We first set up an equilibrium for the cause-effect relations using a fictitious vector autoregressive model. In the equilibrium, long-run relations are identified from noise, and spurious ones are negligibly close to zero. The solution, called causality distribution, measures the relative strength causing the movement of all series or specific affected ones. If a group of exogenous data affects the others but not vice versa, then, in theory, the causality distribution for other variables is necessarily zero. The hypothesis test of zero causality is the rule to decide a variable is endogenous or not. Our new approach has high accuracy in identifying the true cause-effect relations among the data in the simulation studies. We also apply the approach to estimating the causal factors' contribution to climate change.

Related papers

• Hypothesizing Missing Causal Variables with LLMs [55.28678224020973]
  We formulate a novel task where the input is a partial causal graph with missing variables, and the output is a hypothesis about the missing variables to complete the partial graph. We show the strong ability of LLMs to hypothesize the mediation variables between a cause and its effect. We also observe surprising results where some of the open-source models outperform the closed GPT-4 model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T10:37:44Z)
• Challenges in Variable Importance Ranking Under Correlation [6.718144470265263]
  We present a comprehensive simulation study investigating the impact of feature correlation on the assessment of variable importance. While there is always no correlation between knockoff variables and its corresponding predictor variables, we prove that the correlation increases linearly beyond a certain correlation threshold between the predictor variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T19:02:13Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Reinterpreting causal discovery as the task of predicting unobserved joint statistics [15.088547731564782]
  We argue that causal discovery can help inferring properties of the unobserved joint distributions' We define a learning scenario where the input is a subset of variables and the label is some statistical property of that subset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T15:30:54Z)
• Active Bayesian Causal Inference [72.70593653185078]
  We propose Active Bayesian Causal Inference (ABCI), a fully-Bayesian active learning framework for integrated causal discovery and reasoning. ABCI jointly infers a posterior over causal models and queries of interest. We show that our approach is more data-efficient than several baselines that only focus on learning the full causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T22:38:57Z)
• Estimation of Bivariate Structural Causal Models by Variational Gaussian Process Regression Under Likelihoods Parametrised by Normalising Flows [74.85071867225533]
  Causal mechanisms can be described by structural causal models. One major drawback of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence is its lack of explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:52:58Z)
• Discovery of Causal Additive Models in the Presence of Unobserved Variables [6.670414650224422]
  Causal discovery from data affected by unobserved variables is an important but difficult problem to solve. We propose a method to identify all the causal relationships that are theoretically possible to identify without being biased by unobserved variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-04T03:28:27Z)
• Counterfactual Invariance to Spurious Correlations: Why and How to Pass Stress Tests [87.60900567941428]
  A spurious correlation' is the dependence of a model on some aspect of the input data that an analyst thinks shouldn't matter. In machine learning, these have a know-it-when-you-see-it character. We study stress testing using the tools of causal inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-31T14:39:38Z)
• Latent Causal Invariant Model [128.7508609492542]
  Current supervised learning can learn spurious correlation during the data-fitting process. We propose a Latent Causal Invariance Model (LaCIM) which pursues causal prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T10:00:27Z)
• Estimating Causal Effects with the Neural Autoregressive Density Estimator [6.59529078336196]
  We use neural autoregressive density estimators to estimate causal effects within the Pearl's do-calculus framework. We show that the approach can retrieve causal effects from non-linear systems without explicitly modeling the interactions between the variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-17T13:12:38Z)
• Information-Theoretic Approximation to Causal Models [0.0]
  We show that it is possible to solve the problem of inferring the causal direction and causal effect between two random variables from a finite sample. We embed distributions that originate from samples of X and Y into a higher dimensional probability space. We show that this information-theoretic approximation to causal models (IACM) can be done by solving a linear optimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T18:34:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.