Causal Effect Variational Autoencoder with Uniform Treatment
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.08656v1
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:40:57 GMT
- Title: Causal Effect Variational Autoencoder with Uniform Treatment
- Authors: Daniel Jiwoong Im, Kyunghyun Cho, Narges Razavian
- Abstract summary: Causal effect variational autoencoder (CEVAE) are trained to predict the outcome given observational treatment data.
Uniform treatment variational autoencoders (UTVAE) are trained with uniform treatment distribution using importance sampling.
- Score: 50.895390968371665
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Causal effect variational autoencoder (CEVAE) are trained to predict the
outcome given observational treatment data, while uniform treatment variational
autoencoders (UTVAE) are trained with uniform treatment distribution using
importance sampling. In this paper, we show that using uniform treatment over
observational treatment distribution leads to better causal inference by
mitigating the distribution shift that occurs from training to test time. We
also explore the combination of uniform and observational treatment
distributions with inference and generative network training objectives to find
a better training procedure for inferring treatment effect. Experimentally, we
find that the proposed UTVAE yields better absolute average treatment effect
error and precision in estimation of heterogeneous effect error than the CEVAE
on synthetic and IHDP datasets.
Related papers
- Estimating Distributional Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments: Machine Learning for Variance Reduction [6.909352249236339]
We propose a novel regression adjustment method designed for estimating distributional treatment effect parameters in randomized experiments.
Our approach incorporates pre-treatment co-treatments into a distributional regression framework, utilizing machine learning techniques to improve the precision of distributional treatment effect estimators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-22T20:28:29Z) - Continuous Treatment Effect Estimation Using Gradient Interpolation and
Kernel Smoothing [43.259723628010896]
We advocate the direct approach of augmenting training individuals with independently sampled treatments and inferred counterfactual outcomes.
We evaluate our method on five benchmarks and show that our method outperforms six state-of-the-art methods on the counterfactual estimation error.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-27T15:52:58Z) - DESCN: Deep Entire Space Cross Networks for Individual Treatment Effect
Estimation [7.060064266376701]
Causal Inference has wide applications in various areas such as E-commerce and precision medicine.
This paper proposes Deep Entire Space Cross Networks (DESCN) to model treatment effects from an end-to-end perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-19T01:25:31Z) - Treatment Effect Estimation with Observational Network Data using
Machine Learning [0.0]
Causal inference methods for treatment effect estimation usually assume independent units.
We develop augmented inverse probability (AIPW) for estimation and inference of the direct effect of the treatment with observational data from a single (social) network with spillover effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-29T12:52:41Z) - MS Lesion Segmentation: Revisiting Weighting Mechanisms for Federated
Learning [92.91544082745196]
Federated learning (FL) has been widely employed for medical image analysis.
FL's performance is limited for multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion segmentation tasks.
We propose the first FL MS lesion segmentation framework via two effective re-weighting mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-03T14:06:03Z) - Assessment of Treatment Effect Estimators for Heavy-Tailed Data [70.72363097550483]
A central obstacle in the objective assessment of treatment effect (TE) estimators in randomized control trials (RCTs) is the lack of ground truth (or validation set) to test their performance.
We provide a novel cross-validation-like methodology to address this challenge.
We evaluate our methodology across 709 RCTs implemented in the Amazon supply chain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-14T17:53:01Z) - SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event
Data [83.50281440043241]
We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data.
We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z) - Estimating heterogeneous survival treatment effect in observational data
using machine learning [9.951103976634407]
Methods for estimating heterogeneous treatment effect in observational data have largely focused on continuous or binary outcomes.
Using flexible machine learning methods in the counterfactual framework is a promising approach to address challenges due to complex individual characteristics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-17T01:02:14Z) - Estimating Counterfactual Treatment Outcomes over Time Through
Adversarially Balanced Representations [114.16762407465427]
We introduce the Counterfactual Recurrent Network (CRN) to estimate treatment effects over time.
CRN uses domain adversarial training to build balancing representations of the patient history.
We show how our model achieves lower error in estimating counterfactuals and in choosing the correct treatment and timing of treatment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-10T20:47:36Z) - Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of
Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects [61.03579766573421]
We study estimation of individual-level causal effects, such as a single patient's response to alternative medication.
We devise representation learning algorithms that minimize our bound, by regularizing the representation's induced treatment group distance.
We extend these algorithms to simultaneously learn a weighted representation to further reduce treatment group distances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-21T10:16:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.