Evaluating Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning in Critical Infrastructures: A Case Study on Time-Series Classification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.14838v1
• Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:28:22 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning in Critical Infrastructures: A Case Study on Time-Series Classification
• Authors: Dominique Mercier, Adriano Lucieri, Mohsin Munir, Andreas Dengel and Sheraz Ahmed
• Abstract summary: It is pivotal to ensure that neither the model nor the data can be used to extract sensitive information. Various safety-critical use cases (mostly relying on time-series data) are currently underrepresented in privacy-related considerations. By evaluating several privacy-preserving methods regarding their applicability on time-series data, we validated the inefficacy of encryption for deep learning.
• Score: 5.607917328636864
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: With the advent of machine learning in applications of critical infrastructure such as healthcare and energy, privacy is a growing concern in the minds of stakeholders. It is pivotal to ensure that neither the model nor the data can be used to extract sensitive information used by attackers against individuals or to harm whole societies through the exploitation of critical infrastructure. The applicability of machine learning in these domains is mostly limited due to a lack of trust regarding the transparency and the privacy constraints. Various safety-critical use cases (mostly relying on time-series data) are currently underrepresented in privacy-related considerations. By evaluating several privacy-preserving methods regarding their applicability on time-series data, we validated the inefficacy of encryption for deep learning, the strong dataset dependence of differential privacy, and the broad applicability of federated methods.

Related papers

• Privacy in Fine-tuning Large Language Models: Attacks, Defenses, and Future Directions [11.338466798715906]
  Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) can achieve state-of-the-art performance across various domains. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of privacy challenges associated with fine-tuning LLMs. We highlight vulnerabilities to various privacy attacks, including membership inference, data extraction, and backdoor attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-21T06:41:29Z)
• Effectiveness of L2 Regularization in Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning [1.4638393290666896]
  Well-performing models, the industry seeks, usually rely on a large volume of training data. The use of such data raises serious privacy concerns due to the potential risks of leaks of highly sensitive information. In this work, we compare the effectiveness of L2 regularization and differential privacy in mitigating Membership Inference Attack risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T14:31:11Z)
• Collection, usage and privacy of mobility data in the enterprise and public administrations [55.2480439325792]
  Security measures such as anonymization are needed to protect individuals' privacy. Within our study, we conducted expert interviews to gain insights into practices in the field. We survey privacy-enhancing methods in use, which generally do not comply with state-of-the-art standards of differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T08:29:27Z)
• Using Decentralized Aggregation for Federated Learning with Differential Privacy [0.32985979395737774]
  Federated Learning (FL) provides some level of privacy by retaining the data at the local node. This research deploys an experimental environment for FL with Differential Privacy (DP) using benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T17:02:56Z)
• Privacy Preserving Large Language Models: ChatGPT Case Study Based Vision and Framework [6.828884629694705]
  This article proposes the conceptual model called PrivChatGPT, a privacy-generative model for LLMs. PrivChatGPT consists of two main components i.e., preserving user privacy during the data curation/pre-processing together with preserving private context and the private training process for large-scale data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:55:13Z)
• PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
  We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind) Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques. In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z)
• A Unified View of Differentially Private Deep Generative Modeling [60.72161965018005]
  Data with privacy concerns comes with stringent regulations that frequently prohibited data access and data sharing. Overcoming these obstacles is key for technological progress in many real-world application scenarios that involve privacy sensitive data. Differentially private (DP) data publishing provides a compelling solution, where only a sanitized form of the data is publicly released.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:38:16Z)
• Position: Considerations for Differentially Private Learning with Large-Scale Public Pretraining [75.25943383604266]
  We question whether the use of large Web-scraped datasets should be viewed as differential-privacy-preserving. We caution that publicizing these models pretrained on Web data as "private" could lead to harm and erode the public's trust in differential privacy as a meaningful definition of privacy. We conclude by discussing potential paths forward for the field of private learning, as public pretraining becomes more popular and powerful.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T10:41:12Z)
• Distributed Machine Learning and the Semblance of Trust [66.1227776348216]
  Federated Learning (FL) allows the data owner to maintain data governance and perform model training locally without having to share their data. FL and related techniques are often described as privacy-preserving. We explain why this term is not appropriate and outline the risks associated with over-reliance on protocols that were not designed with formal definitions of privacy in mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T08:44:05Z)
• PCAL: A Privacy-preserving Intelligent Credit Risk Modeling Framework Based on Adversarial Learning [111.19576084222345]
  This paper proposes a framework of Privacy-preserving Credit risk modeling based on Adversarial Learning (PCAL) PCAL aims to mask the private information inside the original dataset, while maintaining the important utility information for the target prediction task performance. Results indicate that PCAL can learn an effective, privacy-free representation from user data, providing a solid foundation towards privacy-preserving machine learning for credit risk analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T07:04:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.