Augmenting Neural Networks with Priors on Function Values

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.04798v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 02:24:15 GMT
• Title: Augmenting Neural Networks with Priors on Function Values
• Authors: Hunter Nisonoff, Yixin Wang, Jennifer Listgarten
• Abstract summary: Prior knowledge of function values is often available in the natural sciences. BNNs enable the user to specify prior information only on the neural network weights, not directly on the function values. We develop an approach to augment BNNs with prior information on the function values themselves.
• Score: 22.776982718042962
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The need for function estimation in label-limited settings is common in the natural sciences. At the same time, prior knowledge of function values is often available in these domains. For example, data-free biophysics-based models can be informative on protein properties, while quantum-based computations can be informative on small molecule properties. How can we coherently leverage such prior knowledge to help improve a neural network model that is quite accurate in some regions of input space -- typically near the training data -- but wildly wrong in other regions? Bayesian neural networks (BNN) enable the user to specify prior information only on the neural network weights, not directly on the function values. Moreover, there is in general no clear mapping between these. Herein, we tackle this problem by developing an approach to augment BNNs with prior information on the function values themselves. Our probabilistic approach yields predictions that rely more heavily on the prior information when the epistemic uncertainty is large, and more heavily on the neural network when the epistemic uncertainty is small.

Related papers

• Active Learning with Fully Bayesian Neural Networks for Discontinuous and Nonstationary Data [0.0]
  We introduce fully Bayesian Neural Networks (FBNNs) for active learning tasks in the'small data' regime. FBNNs provide reliable predictive distributions, crucial for making informed decisions under uncertainty in the active learning setting. Here, we assess the suitability and performance of FBNNs with the No-U-Turn Sampler for active learning tasks in the'small data' regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T05:20:47Z)
• Verified Neural Compressed Sensing [58.98637799432153]
  We develop the first (to the best of our knowledge) provably correct neural networks for a precise computational task. We show that for modest problem dimensions (up to 50), we can train neural networks that provably recover a sparse vector from linear and binarized linear measurements. We show that the complexity of the network can be adapted to the problem difficulty and solve problems where traditional compressed sensing methods are not known to provably work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T12:20:12Z)
• Bayesian Neural Networks with Domain Knowledge Priors [52.80929437592308]
  We propose a framework for integrating general forms of domain knowledge into a BNN prior. We show that BNNs using our proposed domain knowledge priors outperform those with standard priors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T22:34:53Z)
• Deep Neural Networks Tend To Extrapolate Predictably [51.303814412294514]
  neural network predictions tend to be unpredictable and overconfident when faced with out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs. We observe that neural network predictions often tend towards a constant value as input data becomes increasingly OOD. We show how one can leverage our insights in practice to enable risk-sensitive decision-making in the presence of OOD inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T03:25:32Z)
• Addressing caveats of neural persistence with deep graph persistence [54.424983583720675]
  We find that the variance of network weights and spatial concentration of large weights are the main factors that impact neural persistence. We propose an extension of the filtration underlying neural persistence to the whole neural network instead of single layers. This yields our deep graph persistence measure, which implicitly incorporates persistent paths through the network and alleviates variance-related issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T13:34:11Z)
• Look beyond labels: Incorporating functional summary information in Bayesian neural networks [11.874130244353253]
  We present a simple approach to incorporate summary information about the predicted probability. The available summary information is incorporated as augmented data and modeled with a Dirichlet process. We show how the method can inform the model about task difficulty or class imbalance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T07:06:45Z)
• Data-driven emergence of convolutional structure in neural networks [83.4920717252233]
  We show how fully-connected neural networks solving a discrimination task can learn a convolutional structure directly from their inputs. By carefully designing data models, we show that the emergence of this pattern is triggered by the non-Gaussian, higher-order local structure of the inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-01T17:11:13Z)
• Dynamic Neural Diversification: Path to Computationally Sustainable Neural Networks [68.8204255655161]
  Small neural networks with a constrained number of trainable parameters, can be suitable resource-efficient candidates for many simple tasks. We explore the diversity of the neurons within the hidden layer during the learning process. We analyze how the diversity of the neurons affects predictions of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-20T15:12:16Z)
• The Compact Support Neural Network [6.47243430672461]
  We present a neuron generalization that has the standard dot-product-based neuron and the RBF neuron as two extreme cases of a shape parameter. We show how to avoid difficulties in training a neural network with such neurons, by starting with a trained standard neural network and gradually increasing the shape parameter to the desired value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-01T06:08:09Z)
• Bayesian Neural Networks [0.0]
  We show how errors in prediction by neural networks can be obtained in principle, and provide the two favoured methods for characterising these errors. We will also describe how both of these methods have substantial pitfalls when put into practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T09:43:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.