Building Inspection Toolkit: Unified Evaluation and Strong Baselines for Damage Recognition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.07012v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 20:05:59 GMT
• Title: Building Inspection Toolkit: Unified Evaluation and Strong Baselines for Damage Recognition
• Authors: Johannes Flotzinger, Philipp J. R\"osch, Norbert Oswald, Thomas Braml
• Abstract summary: We introduce the building inspection toolkit -- bikit -- which acts as a simple to use data hub containing relevant open-source datasets in the field of damage recognition. The datasets are enriched with evaluation splits and predefined metrics, suiting the specific task and their data distribution. For the sake of compatibility and to motivate researchers in this domain, we also provide a leaderboard and the possibility to share model weights with the community.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, several companies and researchers have started to tackle the problem of damage recognition within the scope of automated inspection of built structures. While companies are neither willing to publish associated data nor models, researchers are facing the problem of data shortage on one hand and inconsistent dataset splitting with the absence of consistent metrics on the other hand. This leads to incomparable results. Therefore, we introduce the building inspection toolkit -- bikit -- which acts as a simple to use data hub containing relevant open-source datasets in the field of damage recognition. The datasets are enriched with evaluation splits and predefined metrics, suiting the specific task and their data distribution. For the sake of compatibility and to motivate researchers in this domain, we also provide a leaderboard and the possibility to share model weights with the community. As starting point we provide strong baselines for multi-target classification tasks utilizing extensive hyperparameter search using three transfer learning approaches for state-of-the-art algorithms. The toolkit and the leaderboard are available online.

Related papers

• The Unseen Targets of Hate -- A Systematic Review of Hateful Communication Datasets [15.593796580973937]
  Machine learning tools can only be as capable as the quality of the data they are trained on allows them. We present a systematic review of the datasets for the automated detection of hateful communication introduced over the past decade. We find, overall, a skewed representation of selected target identities and mismatches between the targets that research conceptualizes and ultimately includes in datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T12:50:33Z)
• Harnessing Administrative Data Inventories to Create a Reliable Transnational Reference Database for Crop Type Monitoring [0.0]
  We showcase E URO C ROPS, a reference dataset for crop type classification that aggregates and harmonizes administrative data surveyed in different countries with the goal of transnational interoperability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T07:57:00Z)
• Collect, Measure, Repeat: Reliability Factors for Responsible AI Data Collection [8.12993269922936]
  We argue that data collection for AI should be performed in a responsible manner. We propose a Responsible AI (RAI) methodology designed to guide the data collection with a set of metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T18:01:27Z)
• Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Auditing Data and Impact of Categorical Encodings [20.37092575427039]
  Vehicle Claims dataset consists of fraudulent insurance claims for automotive repairs. We tackle the common problem of missing benchmark datasets for anomaly detection. The dataset is evaluated on shallow and deep learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T14:33:17Z)
• Metadata Archaeology: Unearthing Data Subsets by Leveraging Training Dynamics [3.9627732117855414]
  We focus on providing a unified and efficient framework for Metadata Archaeology. We curate different subsets of data that might exist in a dataset. We leverage differences in learning dynamics between these probe suites to infer metadata of interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-20T21:52:39Z)
• DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Development [81.03754002516862]
  DataPerf is a community-led benchmark suite for evaluating ML datasets and data-centric algorithms. We provide an open, online platform with multiple rounds of challenges to support this iterative development. The benchmarks, online evaluation platform, and baseline implementations are open source.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T17:47:54Z)
• Detection Hub: Unifying Object Detection Datasets via Query Adaptation on Language Embedding [137.3719377780593]
  A new design (named Detection Hub) is dataset-aware and category-aligned. It mitigates the dataset inconsistency and provides coherent guidance for the detector to learn across multiple datasets. The categories across datasets are semantically aligned into a unified space by replacing one-hot category representations with word embedding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T17:59:44Z)
• Causal Scene BERT: Improving object detection by searching for challenging groups of data [125.40669814080047]
  Computer vision applications rely on learning-based perception modules parameterized with neural networks for tasks like object detection. These modules frequently have low expected error overall but high error on atypical groups of data due to biases inherent in the training process. Our main contribution is a pseudo-automatic method to discover such groups in foresight by performing causal interventions on simulated scenes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T05:14:16Z)
• Attentive Prototypes for Source-free Unsupervised Domain Adaptive 3D Object Detection [85.11649974840758]
  3D object detection networks tend to be biased towards the data they are trained on. We propose a single-frame approach for source-free, unsupervised domain adaptation of lidar-based 3D object detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-30T18:42:42Z)
• Unsupervised Domain Adaption of Object Detectors: A Survey [87.08473838767235]
  Recent advances in deep learning have led to the development of accurate and efficient models for various computer vision applications. Learning highly accurate models relies on the availability of datasets with a large number of annotated images. Due to this, model performance drops drastically when evaluated on label-scarce datasets having visually distinct images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-27T23:34:06Z)
• Hidden Biases in Unreliable News Detection Datasets [60.71991809782698]
  We show that selection bias during data collection leads to undesired artifacts in the datasets. We observed a significant drop (>10%) in accuracy for all models tested in a clean split with no train/test source overlap. We suggest future dataset creation include a simple model as a difficulty/bias probe and future model development use a clean non-overlapping site and date split.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-20T17:16:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.