Does Science need Intersubjectivity? The Problem of Confirmation in Orthodox Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.16278v2
• Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 14:31:02 GMT
• Title: Does Science need Intersubjectivity? The Problem of Confirmation in Orthodox Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
• Authors: Emily Adlam
• Abstract summary: We argue that any successful interpretation of quantum mechanics must explain how our empirical evidence allows us to come to know about quantum mechanics. We take a detailed look at the way in which belief-updating might work in the kind of universe postulated by an orthodox interpretation. We argue that in some versions of these interpretations it is not even possible to use one's own relative frequencies for empirical confirmation.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Any successful interpretation of quantum mechanics must explain how our empirical evidence allows us to come to know about quantum mechanics. In this article, we argue that this vital criterion is not met by the class of 'orthodox interpretations,' which includes QBism, neo-Copenhagen interpretations, and some versions of relational quantum mechanics. We demonstrate that intersubjectivity fails in radical ways in these approaches, and we explain why intersubjectivity matters for empirical confirmation. We take a detailed look at the way in which belief-updating might work in the kind of universe postulated by an orthodox interpretation, and argue that observers in such a universe are unable to escape their own perspective in order to learn about the structure of the set of perspectives that is supposed to make up reality according to these interpretations. We also argue that in some versions of these interpretations it is not even possible to use one's own relative frequencies for empirical confirmation. Ultimately we conclude that it cannot be rational to believe these sorts of interpretations unless they are supplemented with some observer-independent structure which underwrites intersubjective agreement in at least certain sorts of cases.

Related papers

• A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
  We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device. Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z)
• Everything is Entangled in Quantum Mechanics: Are the Orthodox Measures Physically Meaningful? [0.0]
  We will argue that this new line of research is capable not only to evade the many open problems which appear within the mainstream literature, but is also able to present a consistent and coherent physical understanding of entanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T13:22:10Z)
• Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
  We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions. We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z)
• Perspectival Quantum Realism [0.0]
  We argue that the problems identified by QBism and Quantum Pragmatism do not necessitate abandoning the ideal of representing the physical world. We can avail ourselves of the same puzzle-solving strategies as employed by QBists and pragmatists by adopting a emphperspectival quantum realism
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T16:23:54Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• The Real Meaning of Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  We suggest a contextual realist interpretation of relational quantum mechanics. The principal point is a correct understanding of the concept of reality. Within our interpretation, consciousness of the observer does not play any metaphysical role.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-20T19:44:50Z)
• Testing quantum theory with thought experiments [4.847980206213335]
  How should one model systems that include agents who are themselves using quantum theory? We give a state-of-the-art overview on quantum thought experiments involving observers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T18:08:23Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Quantization of Reality, another Epistemological Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics? [0.0]
  The interpretation of quantum mechanics is still in an unacceptable status. For the sake of human curiosity and to get a better understanding of the universe we are living in, this attitude should be changed. A possibly interesting new approach is outlined in this article, which may help adjust the focus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-07T15:41:26Z)
• A New Enhanced Version of The Ensemble Interpretation [0.0]
  We will prove one interpretation, in particular, a version of the ensemble interpretation, as the natural interpretation of quantum mechanics. We will also prove the axioms of quantum mechanics, without the need of anything beyond probability theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-03T15:02:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.