Everything is Entangled in Quantum Mechanics: Are the Orthodox Measures Physically Meaningful?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05756v1
• Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 13:22:10 GMT
• Title: Everything is Entangled in Quantum Mechanics: Are the Orthodox Measures Physically Meaningful?
• Authors: Christian de Ronde, Raimundo Fernandez Moujan, Cesar Massri,
• Abstract summary: We will argue that this new line of research is capable not only to evade the many open problems which appear within the mainstream literature, but is also able to present a consistent and coherent physical understanding of entanglement.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Even though quantum entanglement is today's most essential concept within the new technological era of quantum information processing, we do not only lack a consistent definition of this kernel notion, we are also far from understanding its physical meaning [35]. These failures have lead to many problems when attempting to provide a consistent measure or quantification of entanglement. In fact, the two main lines of contemporary research within the orthodox literature have created mazes where inconsistencies and problems are found everywhere. While the operational-instrumentalist approach has failed to explain how inequalities are able to distinguish the classical from the quantum, the geometrical approach has failed to provide a consistent meaningful account of their entropic measure. Taking distance from orthodoxy, in this work we address the quantification and measure of quantum entanglement by considering a recently presented objective-invariant definition in terms of the coding of intensive relations [21] which allows to escape the widespread relativist account of bases and factorizations [24, 25]. Going beyond the orthodox dualistic reference to "quantum particles" and "clicks" in detectors, we will argue that this new line of research is capable not only to evade the many open problems which appear within the mainstream literature, but is also able to present a consistent and coherent physical understanding of entanglement. The main conclusion of this work is that in quantum mechanics --contrary to what is generally presupposed-- all operational expressions found within the laboratory are intrinsically entangled.

Related papers

• Causality and a possible interpretation of quantum mechanics [3.236774847052122]
  We propose a framework based on quantum field theory to integrate relativistic causality, quantum non-locality, and quantum measurement. We utilize reduced density matrices to characterize the local information of the quantum state and demonstrate that they cannot evolve superluminally. It is precisely these renormalization that prompts us to question the validity of the derivation of quantum paradoxes and lead us to propose a very natural and relativistically compatible interpretation of quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T07:07:22Z)
• Quantum algorithms: A survey of applications and end-to-end complexities [90.05272647148196]
  The anticipated applications of quantum computers span across science and industry. We present a survey of several potential application areas of quantum algorithms. We outline the challenges and opportunities in each area in an "end-to-end" fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T17:53:55Z)
• Step-by-step derivation of the algebraic structure of quantum mechanics (or from nondisturbing to quantum correlations by connecting incompatible observables) [0.0]
  This paper provides a step-by-step derivation of the quantum formalism. It helps us to understand why this formalism is as it is.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T19:27:24Z)
• Improved Quantum Algorithms for Fidelity Estimation [77.34726150561087]
  We develop new and efficient quantum algorithms for fidelity estimation with provable performance guarantees. Our algorithms use advanced quantum linear algebra techniques, such as the quantum singular value transformation. We prove that fidelity estimation to any non-trivial constant additive accuracy is hard in general.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T02:02:16Z)
• Convexity and uncertainty in operational quantum foundations [0.0]
  The purpose of this thesis is to investigate fundamental aspects of uncertainty. We first try to reveal why in quantum theory similar bounds are often obtained for two types of uncertainty relations. Then we consider a broader expression of uncertainty in quantum theory called quantum incompatibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-28T14:45:10Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Experimental violations of Leggett-Garg's inequalities on a quantum computer [77.34726150561087]
  We experimentally observe the violations of Leggett-Garg-Bell's inequalities on single and multi-qubit systems. Our analysis highlights the limits of nowadays quantum platforms, showing that the above-mentioned correlation functions deviate from theoretical prediction as the number of qubits and the depth of the circuit grow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:35:15Z)
• The Montevideo Interpretation: How the inclusion of a Quantum Gravitational Notion of Time Solves the Measurement Problem [0.0]
  We review the Montevideo Interpretation of quantum mechanics, based on the use of real clocks to describe physics. Recent results on quantum complexity provide additional support to the type of global protocols used to prove that within ordinary -- unitary -- quantum mechanics no definite event occurs. We show that, if one takes into account fundamental inescapable uncertainties in measuring length and time intervals due to general relativity and quantum mechanics, the previously mentioned global protocols no longer allow to distinguish whether the state is in a superposition or not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T18:00:01Z)
• Preferred basis, decoherence and a quantum state of the Universe [77.34726150561087]
  We review a number of issues in foundations of quantum theory and quantum cosmology. These issues can be considered as a part of the scientific legacy of H.D. Zeh.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T18:07:59Z)
• Entropic Uncertainty Relations and the Quantum-to-Classical transition [77.34726150561087]
  We aim to shed some light on the quantum-to-classical transition as seen through the analysis of uncertainty relations. We employ entropic uncertainty relations to show that it is only by the inclusion of imprecision in our model of macroscopic measurements that we can prepare a system with two simultaneously well-defined quantities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T14:01:17Z)
• The (Quantum) Measurement Problem in Classical Mechanics [0.0]
  We show why this is not an "obvious" nor "self evident" problem for the theory of quanta. We discuss a representational realist account of both physical 'theories' and'measurement' We show how through these same set of presuppositions it is easy to derive a completely analogous paradox for the case of classical mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-01T17:07:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.