Everything is Entangled in Quantum Mechanics: Are the Orthodox Measures Physically Meaningful?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05756v1
• Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 13:22:10 GMT
• Title: Everything is Entangled in Quantum Mechanics: Are the Orthodox Measures Physically Meaningful?
• Authors: Christian de Ronde, Raimundo Fernandez Moujan, Cesar Massri,
• Abstract summary: We will argue that this new line of research is capable not only to evade the many open problems which appear within the mainstream literature, but is also able to present a consistent and coherent physical understanding of entanglement.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Even though quantum entanglement is today's most essential concept within the new technological era of quantum information processing, we do not only lack a consistent definition of this kernel notion, we are also far from understanding its physical meaning [35]. These failures have lead to many problems when attempting to provide a consistent measure or quantification of entanglement. In fact, the two main lines of contemporary research within the orthodox literature have created mazes where inconsistencies and problems are found everywhere. While the operational-instrumentalist approach has failed to explain how inequalities are able to distinguish the classical from the quantum, the geometrical approach has failed to provide a consistent meaningful account of their entropic measure. Taking distance from orthodoxy, in this work we address the quantification and measure of quantum entanglement by considering a recently presented objective-invariant definition in terms of the coding of intensive relations [21] which allows to escape the widespread relativist account of bases and factorizations [24, 25]. Going beyond the orthodox dualistic reference to "quantum particles" and "clicks" in detectors, we will argue that this new line of research is capable not only to evade the many open problems which appear within the mainstream literature, but is also able to present a consistent and coherent physical understanding of entanglement. The main conclusion of this work is that in quantum mechanics --contrary to what is generally presupposed-- all operational expressions found within the laboratory are intrinsically entangled.

Related papers

• Speakable and unspeakable in quantum measurements [0.0]
  A new approach, based on so-called "weak measurements", suggests that such forbidden knowledge can be gained by studying the system's response to an inaccurate weakly perturbing device. It goes further to propose revising the whole concept of physics variables, and offers various examples of counterintuitive quantum behaviour. A new technique must either transcend the orthodox limits, or just prove that these limits are indeed necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T12:24:18Z)
• Causality and a possible interpretation of quantum mechanics [2.7398542529968477]
  Based on quantum field theory, our work provides a framework that harmoniously integrates relativistic causality, quantum non-locality, and quantum measurement. We use reduced density matrices to represent the local information of the quantum state and show that the reduced density matrices cannot evolve superluminally. Unlike recent approaches that focus on causality by introducing new operators to describe detectors, we consider that everything--including detectors, environments, and humans--is composed of the same fundamental fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T07:07:22Z)
• Quantum algorithms: A survey of applications and end-to-end complexities [90.05272647148196]
  The anticipated applications of quantum computers span across science and industry. We present a survey of several potential application areas of quantum algorithms. We outline the challenges and opportunities in each area in an "end-to-end" fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T17:53:55Z)
• Step-by-step derivation of the algebraic structure of quantum mechanics (or from nondisturbing to quantum correlations by connecting incompatible observables) [0.0]
  This paper provides a step-by-step derivation of the quantum formalism. It helps us to understand why this formalism is as it is.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T19:27:24Z)
• The Many Inconsistencies of the Purity-Mixture Distinction in Standard Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  The distinction between pure states and mixed states is a kernel ingredient of what is considered to be the standard formulation of quantum mechanics. In this work we attempt to expose the many inconsistencies introduced by this distinction and the serious consequences this has for many ongoing research programs within quantum physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-22T20:03:25Z)
• Improved Quantum Algorithms for Fidelity Estimation [77.34726150561087]
  We develop new and efficient quantum algorithms for fidelity estimation with provable performance guarantees. Our algorithms use advanced quantum linear algebra techniques, such as the quantum singular value transformation. We prove that fidelity estimation to any non-trivial constant additive accuracy is hard in general.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T02:02:16Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Experimental violations of Leggett-Garg's inequalities on a quantum computer [77.34726150561087]
  We experimentally observe the violations of Leggett-Garg-Bell's inequalities on single and multi-qubit systems. Our analysis highlights the limits of nowadays quantum platforms, showing that the above-mentioned correlation functions deviate from theoretical prediction as the number of qubits and the depth of the circuit grow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:35:15Z)
• Preferred basis, decoherence and a quantum state of the Universe [77.34726150561087]
  We review a number of issues in foundations of quantum theory and quantum cosmology. These issues can be considered as a part of the scientific legacy of H.D. Zeh.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T18:07:59Z)
• Entropic Uncertainty Relations and the Quantum-to-Classical transition [77.34726150561087]
  We aim to shed some light on the quantum-to-classical transition as seen through the analysis of uncertainty relations. We employ entropic uncertainty relations to show that it is only by the inclusion of imprecision in our model of macroscopic measurements that we can prepare a system with two simultaneously well-defined quantities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T14:01:17Z)
• The (Quantum) Measurement Problem in Classical Mechanics [0.0]
  We show why this is not an "obvious" nor "self evident" problem for the theory of quanta. We discuss a representational realist account of both physical 'theories' and'measurement' We show how through these same set of presuppositions it is easy to derive a completely analogous paradox for the case of classical mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-01T17:07:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.