Pragmatic Clinical Trials in the Rubric of Structural Causal Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.13782v1
• Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 21:12:38 GMT
• Title: Pragmatic Clinical Trials in the Rubric of Structural Causal Models
• Authors: Riddhiman Adib, Sheikh Iqbal Ahamed, Mohammad Adibuzzaman
• Abstract summary: Pragmatic clinical trials (PCT) fall between explanatory studies and observational studies. No standardized representation of PCT through structural causal models (SCM) has been yet established. We propose a generalized representation of PCT under the rubric of structural causal models (SCM)
• Score: 1.1049608786515839
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Explanatory studies, such as randomized controlled trials, are targeted to extract the true causal effect of interventions on outcomes and are by design adjusted for covariates through randomization. On the contrary, observational studies are a representation of events that occurred without intervention. Both can be illustrated using the Structural Causal Model (SCM), and do-calculus can be employed to estimate the causal effects. Pragmatic clinical trials (PCT) fall between these two ends of the trial design spectra and are thus hard to define. Due to its pragmatic nature, no standardized representation of PCT through SCM has been yet established. In this paper, we approach this problem by proposing a generalized representation of PCT under the rubric of structural causal models (SCM). We discuss different analysis techniques commonly employed in PCT using the proposed graphical model, such as intention-to-treat, as-treated, and per-protocol analysis. To show the application of our proposed approach, we leverage an experimental dataset from a pragmatic clinical trial. Our proposition of SCM through PCT creates a pathway to leveraging do-calculus and related mathematical operations on clinical datasets.

Related papers

• SSL Framework for Causal Inconsistency between Structures and Representations [23.035761299444953]
  Cross-pollination of deep learning and causal discovery has catalyzed a burgeoning field of research seeking to elucidate causal relationships within non-statistical data forms like images, videos, and text. We theoretically develop intervention strategies suitable for indefinite data and derive causal consistency condition (CCC) CCC could potentially play an influential role in various fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T08:29:49Z)
• Informing clinical assessment by contextualizing post-hoc explanations of risk prediction models in type-2 diabetes [50.8044927215346]
  We consider a comorbidity risk prediction scenario and focus on contexts regarding the patients clinical state. We employ several state-of-the-art LLMs to present contexts around risk prediction model inferences and evaluate their acceptability. Our paper is one of the first end-to-end analyses identifying the feasibility and benefits of contextual explanations in a real-world clinical use case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T18:07:11Z)
• Continuous-Time Modeling of Counterfactual Outcomes Using Neural Controlled Differential Equations [84.42837346400151]
  Estimating counterfactual outcomes over time has the potential to unlock personalized healthcare. Existing causal inference approaches consider regular, discrete-time intervals between observations and treatment decisions. We propose a controllable simulation environment based on a model of tumor growth for a range of scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T17:15:15Z)
• Multi-Task Adversarial Learning for Treatment Effect Estimation in Basket Trials [12.266020657495618]
  We describe causal inference for application in a novel clinical design called basket trial. We propose a multi-task adversarial learning (MTAL) method to estimate potential outcomes across different tumor types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T02:41:26Z)
• Automated causal inference in application to randomized controlled clinical trials [2.014647406790584]
  We propose a new automated causal inference method (AutoCI) for causal re-interpretation of clinical trial data. We show that the proposed AutoCI allows to efficiently determine the causal variables with a clear differentiation on two real-world RCTs of endometrial cancer patients. In ablation studies, we demonstrate that the assignment of causal probabilities by AutoCI remain consistent in the presence of confounders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T07:01:25Z)
• Bayesian prognostic covariate adjustment [59.75318183140857]
  Historical data about disease outcomes can be integrated into the analysis of clinical trials in many ways. We build on existing literature that uses prognostic scores from a predictive model to increase the efficiency of treatment effect estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-24T05:19:03Z)
• Clinical Temporal Relation Extraction with Probabilistic Soft Logic Regularization and Global Inference [50.029659413650194]
  Existing methods either require expensive feature engineering or are incapable of modeling the global dependencies among the events. In this paper, we propose a novel method, Clinical Temporal ReLation Exaction with Probabilistic Soft Logic Regularization and Global Inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-16T08:23:03Z)
• Predicting Clinical Trial Results by Implicit Evidence Integration [40.80948875051806]
  We introduce a novel Clinical Trial Result Prediction (CTRP) task. In the CTRP framework, a model takes a PICO-formatted clinical trial proposal with its background as input and predicts the result. We exploit large-scale unstructured sentences from medical literature that implicitly contain PICOs and results as evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-12T12:25:41Z)
• Benchmarking off-the-shelf statistical shape modeling tools in clinical applications [53.47202621511081]
  We systematically assess the outcome of widely used, state-of-the-art SSM tools. We propose validation frameworks for anatomical landmark/measurement inference and lesion screening. ShapeWorks and Deformetrica shape models are found to capture clinically relevant population-level variability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-07T03:51:35Z)
• Trajectories, bifurcations and pseudotime in large clinical datasets: applications to myocardial infarction and diabetes data [94.37521840642141]
  We suggest a semi-supervised methodology for the analysis of large clinical datasets, characterized by mixed data types and missing values. The methodology is based on application of elastic principal graphs which can address simultaneously the tasks of dimensionality reduction, data visualization, clustering, feature selection and quantifying the geodesic distances (pseudotime) in partially ordered sequences of observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-07T21:04:55Z)
• A Causally Formulated Hazard Ratio Estimation through Backdoor Adjustment on Structural Causal Model [0.98314893665023]
  We review existing approaches to compute hazard ratios as well as their causal interpretation, if it exists. We propose a novel approach to compute hazard ratios from observational studies using backdoor adjustment through SCMs and do-calculus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T19:10:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.