Pragmatic Clinical Trials in the Rubric of Structural Causal Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.13782v1
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 21:12:38 GMT
- Title: Pragmatic Clinical Trials in the Rubric of Structural Causal Models
- Abstract summary: Pragmatic clinical trials (PCT) fall between explanatory studies and observational studies.
No standardized representation of PCT through structural causal models (SCM) has been yet established.
We propose a generalized representation of PCT under the rubric of structural causal models (SCM)
- Score: 1.1049608786515839
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Explanatory studies, such as randomized controlled trials, are targeted to
extract the true causal effect of interventions on outcomes and are by design
adjusted for covariates through randomization. On the contrary, observational
studies are a representation of events that occurred without intervention. Both
can be illustrated using the Structural Causal Model (SCM), and do-calculus can
be employed to estimate the causal effects. Pragmatic clinical trials (PCT)
fall between these two ends of the trial design spectra and are thus hard to
define. Due to its pragmatic nature, no standardized representation of PCT
through SCM has been yet established. In this paper, we approach this problem
by proposing a generalized representation of PCT under the rubric of structural
causal models (SCM). We discuss different analysis techniques commonly employed
in PCT using the proposed graphical model, such as intention-to-treat,
as-treated, and per-protocol analysis. To show the application of our proposed
approach, we leverage an experimental dataset from a pragmatic clinical trial.
Our proposition of SCM through PCT creates a pathway to leveraging do-calculus
and related mathematical operations on clinical datasets.
Related papers
- Confounder Detection via Treatment Intent: A New Observational Study Design [69.50062870487349]
We introduce a new study design called confounder detection via treatment intent.<n>The idea is to query a human expert who makes treatment decisions, and ask them to compare pairs of units.<n>We show empirical evidence that electronic health records collected in ICUs are subject to unobserved confounding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-26T00:41:47Z) - From Static Risk to Dynamic Trajectories: Toward World-Model-Inspired Clinical Prediction [61.12883122613684]
This Review focuses on intervention-aware disease trajectory modeling in clinical AI--methods estimating patient-specific longitudinal disease evolution and assessing trajectory changes under alternative treatments.<n>We organize the field around six linked components: three decision tasks (factual forecasting, counterfactual estimation, policy evaluation) and three data-generating mechanisms (disease evolution, treatment assignment, observation process) that determine identifiability.<n>We present the first unified framework bridging forecasting, counterfactual trajectories, and policy evaluation across discrete/continuous time, explicitly addressing treatment assignment, time-varying confounding, and observation bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-16T10:45:26Z) - Information-Theoretic Optimization for Task-Adapted Compressed Sensing Magnetic Resonance Imaging [92.90858286761515]
Task-adapted compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging (CS-MRI) is emerging to address the specific demands of downstream clinical tasks.<n>We propose the first task-adapted CS-MRI from the information-theoretic perspective to simultaneously achieve probabilistic inference for uncertainty prediction.<n>We leverage amortized optimization and construct tractable variational bounds for mutual information to jointly optimize sampling, reconstruction, and task-inference models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-14T13:23:19Z) - Clinical Cognition Alignment for Gastrointestinal Diagnosis with Multimodal LLMs [63.535652574541764]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in medical image analysis.<n>Their application in gastrointestinal endoscopy is currently hindered by two critical limitations.<n>We propose a novel Clinical-Cognitive-Aligned (CogAlign) framework to address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-21T07:47:37Z) - Causal Inference for Preprocessed Outcomes with an Application to Functional Connectivity [1.7078619393681336]
We propose a semiparametric framework for causal inference with derived outcomes obtained after intra-subject processing.<n>We specialize the framework to a mediation setting and focus on the natural direct effect.<n>We apply our method to estimate the impact of stimulant medication on brain connectivity in children with autism spectrum disorder.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-02T15:48:34Z) - THCM-CAL: Temporal-Hierarchical Causal Modelling with Conformal Calibration for Clinical Risk Prediction [18.00167292196245]
We propose THCM-CAL, a Temporal-Hierarchical Causal Model with Conformal Causal.<n>Our framework constructs a multimodal causal graph where nodes represent clinical entities from two modalities.<n>Through hierarchical causal discovery, THCM-CAL infers three clinically grounded interactions: intra-slice same-modality sequencing, intra-slice cross-modality triggers, and inter-slice risk propagation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-21T22:43:42Z) - Model-free Methods for Event History Analysis and Efficient Adjustment (PhD Thesis) [55.2480439325792]
This thesis is a series of independent contributions to statistics unified by a model-free perspective.
The first chapter elaborates on how a model-free perspective can be used to formulate flexible methods that leverage prediction techniques from machine learning.
The second chapter studies the concept of local independence, which describes whether the evolution of one process is directly influenced by another.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-11T19:24:09Z) - SSL Framework for Causal Inconsistency between Structures and
Representations [23.035761299444953]
Cross-pollination of deep learning and causal discovery has catalyzed a burgeoning field of research seeking to elucidate causal relationships within non-statistical data forms like images, videos, and text.
We theoretically develop intervention strategies suitable for indefinite data and derive causal consistency condition (CCC)
CCC could potentially play an influential role in various fields.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-28T08:29:49Z) - Informing clinical assessment by contextualizing post-hoc explanations
of risk prediction models in type-2 diabetes [50.8044927215346]
We consider a comorbidity risk prediction scenario and focus on contexts regarding the patients clinical state.
We employ several state-of-the-art LLMs to present contexts around risk prediction model inferences and evaluate their acceptability.
Our paper is one of the first end-to-end analyses identifying the feasibility and benefits of contextual explanations in a real-world clinical use case.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-11T18:07:11Z) - Continuous-Time Modeling of Counterfactual Outcomes Using Neural
Controlled Differential Equations [84.42837346400151]
Estimating counterfactual outcomes over time has the potential to unlock personalized healthcare.
Existing causal inference approaches consider regular, discrete-time intervals between observations and treatment decisions.
We propose a controllable simulation environment based on a model of tumor growth for a range of scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-16T17:15:15Z) - Multi-Task Adversarial Learning for Treatment Effect Estimation in
Basket Trials [12.266020657495618]
We describe causal inference for application in a novel clinical design called basket trial.
We propose a multi-task adversarial learning (MTAL) method to estimate potential outcomes across different tumor types.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-10T02:41:26Z) - Automated causal inference in application to randomized controlled
clinical trials [2.014647406790584]
We propose a new automated causal inference method (AutoCI) for causal re-interpretation of clinical trial data.
We show that the proposed AutoCI allows to efficiently determine the causal variables with a clear differentiation on two real-world RCTs of endometrial cancer patients.
In ablation studies, we demonstrate that the assignment of causal probabilities by AutoCI remain consistent in the presence of confounders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-15T07:01:25Z) - Causal Mediation Analysis with Hidden Confounders [24.246450472404614]
Causal mediation analysis (CMA) is a formal statistical approach for identifying and estimating causal effects.
This work aims to circumvent the stringent assumption by following a causal graph with a unified confounder and its proxy variables.
Our core contribution is an algorithm that combines deep latent-variable models and proxy strategy to jointly infer a unified surrogate confounder and estimate different causal effects in CMA from observed variables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-21T06:46:11Z) - Bayesian prognostic covariate adjustment [59.75318183140857]
Historical data about disease outcomes can be integrated into the analysis of clinical trials in many ways.
We build on existing literature that uses prognostic scores from a predictive model to increase the efficiency of treatment effect estimates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-24T05:19:03Z) - Clinical Temporal Relation Extraction with Probabilistic Soft Logic
Regularization and Global Inference [50.029659413650194]
Existing methods either require expensive feature engineering or are incapable of modeling the global dependencies among the events.
In this paper, we propose a novel method, Clinical Temporal ReLation Exaction with Probabilistic Soft Logic Regularization and Global Inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-16T08:23:03Z) - Predicting Clinical Trial Results by Implicit Evidence Integration [40.80948875051806]
We introduce a novel Clinical Trial Result Prediction (CTRP) task.
In the CTRP framework, a model takes a PICO-formatted clinical trial proposal with its background as input and predicts the result.
We exploit large-scale unstructured sentences from medical literature that implicitly contain PICOs and results as evidence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-12T12:25:41Z) - Benchmarking off-the-shelf statistical shape modeling tools in clinical
applications [53.47202621511081]
We systematically assess the outcome of widely used, state-of-the-art SSM tools.
We propose validation frameworks for anatomical landmark/measurement inference and lesion screening.
ShapeWorks and Deformetrica shape models are found to capture clinically relevant population-level variability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-07T03:51:35Z) - Trajectories, bifurcations and pseudotime in large clinical datasets:
applications to myocardial infarction and diabetes data [94.37521840642141]
We suggest a semi-supervised methodology for the analysis of large clinical datasets, characterized by mixed data types and missing values.
The methodology is based on application of elastic principal graphs which can address simultaneously the tasks of dimensionality reduction, data visualization, clustering, feature selection and quantifying the geodesic distances (pseudotime) in partially ordered sequences of observations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-07T21:04:55Z) - A Causally Formulated Hazard Ratio Estimation through Backdoor
Adjustment on Structural Causal Model [0.98314893665023]
We review existing approaches to compute hazard ratios as well as their causal interpretation, if it exists.
We propose a novel approach to compute hazard ratios from observational studies using backdoor adjustment through SCMs and do-calculus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-22T19:10:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.