Investigating writing style as a contributor to gender gaps in science and technology

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.13805v3
• Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:25:07 GMT
• Title: Investigating writing style as a contributor to gender gaps in science and technology
• Authors: Kara Kedrick, Ekaterina Levitskaya, Russell J. Funk,
• Abstract summary: We find significant differences in writing style by gender, with women using more involved features in their writing. Papers and patents with more involved features also tend to be cited more by women. Our findings suggest that scientific text is not devoid of personal character, which could contribute to bias in evaluation.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: A growing stream of research finds that scientific contributions are evaluated differently depending on the gender of the author. In this article, we consider whether gender differences in writing styles - how men and women communicate their work - may contribute to these observed gender gaps. We ground our investigation in a framework for characterizing the linguistic style of written text, with two sets of features - informational (i.e., features that emphasize facts) and involved (i.e., features that emphasize relationships). Using a large sample of academic papers and patents, we find significant differences in writing style by gender, with women using more involved features in their writing. Papers and patents with more involved features also tend to be cited more by women. Our findings suggest that scientific text is not devoid of personal character, which could contribute to bias in evaluation, thereby compromising the norm of universalism as a foundational principle of science.

Related papers

• Inclusivity in Large Language Models: Personality Traits and Gender Bias in Scientific Abstracts [49.97673761305336]
  We evaluate three large language models (LLMs) for their alignment with human narrative styles and potential gender biases. Our findings indicate that, while these models generally produce text closely resembling human authored content, variations in stylistic features suggest significant gender biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T19:26:11Z)
• Less than one percent of words would be affected by gender-inclusive language in German press texts [43.16629507708997]
  We show that, on average, less than 1% of all tokens would be affected by gender-inclusive language. This small proportion calls into question whether gender-inclusive German presents a substantial barrier to understanding and learning the language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T10:32:34Z)
• Voices of Her: Analyzing Gender Differences in the AI Publication World [26.702520904075044]
  We identify several gender differences using the AI Scholar dataset of 78K researchers in the field of AI. Female first-authored papers show distinct linguistic styles, such as longer text, more positive emotion words, and more catchy titles. Our analysis provides a window into the current demographic trends in our AI community, and encourages more gender equality and diversity in the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T00:40:49Z)
• Much Ado About Gender: Current Practices and Future Recommendations for Appropriate Gender-Aware Information Access [3.3903891679981593]
  Information access research (and development) sometimes makes use of gender. This work makes a variety of assumptions about gender that are not aligned with current understandings of what gender is. Most papers we review rely on a binary notion of gender, even if they acknowledge that gender cannot be split into two categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-12T01:21:02Z)
• Towards Understanding Gender-Seniority Compound Bias in Natural Language Generation [64.65911758042914]
  We investigate how seniority impacts the degree of gender bias exhibited in pretrained neural generation models. Our results show that GPT-2 amplifies bias by considering women as junior and men as senior more often than the ground truth in both domains. These results suggest that NLP applications built using GPT-2 may harm women in professional capacities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T20:05:02Z)
• Analyzing Gender Representation in Multilingual Models [59.21915055702203]
  We focus on the representation of gender distinctions as a practical case study. We examine the extent to which the gender concept is encoded in shared subspaces across different languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-20T00:13:01Z)
• They, Them, Theirs: Rewriting with Gender-Neutral English [56.14842450974887]
  We perform a case study on the singular they, a common way to promote gender inclusion in English. We show how a model can be trained to produce gender-neutral English with 1% word error rate with no human-labeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T21:47:48Z)
• Gender bias in magazines oriented to men and women: a computational approach [58.720142291102135]
  We compare the content of a women-oriented magazine with that of a men-oriented one, both produced by the same editorial group over a decade. With Topic Modelling techniques we identify the main themes discussed in the magazines and quantify how much the presence of these topics differs between magazines over time. Our results show that the frequency of appearance of the topics Family, Business and Women as sex objects, present an initial bias that tends to disappear over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T14:02:49Z)
• Pick a Fight or Bite your Tongue: Investigation of Gender Differences in Idiomatic Language Usage [9.892162266128306]
  We compile a novel, large and diverse corpus of spontaneous linguistic productions annotated with speakers' gender. We perform a first large-scale empirical study of distinctions in the usage of textitfigurative language between male and female authors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-31T18:44:07Z)
• Multi-Dimensional Gender Bias Classification [67.65551687580552]
  Machine learning models can inadvertently learn socially undesirable patterns when training on gender biased text. We propose a general framework that decomposes gender bias in text along several pragmatic and semantic dimensions. Using this fine-grained framework, we automatically annotate eight large scale datasets with gender information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T21:23:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.