Less than one percent of words would be affected by gender-inclusive language in German press texts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03870v1
• Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:32:34 GMT
• Title: Less than one percent of words would be affected by gender-inclusive language in German press texts
• Authors: Carolin M\"uller-Spitzer, Samira Ochs, Alexander Koplenig, Jan-Oliver R\"udiger, Sascha Wolfer
• Abstract summary: We show that, on average, less than 1% of all tokens would be affected by gender-inclusive language. This small proportion calls into question whether gender-inclusive German presents a substantial barrier to understanding and learning the language.
• Score: 43.16629507708997
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Research on gender and language is tightly knitted to social debates on gender equality and non-discriminatory language use. Psycholinguistic scholars have made significant contributions in this field. However, corpus-based studies that investigate these matters within the context of language use are still rare. In our study, we address the question of how much textual material would actually have to be changed if non-gender-inclusive texts were rewritten to be gender-inclusive. This quantitative measure is an important empirical insight, as a recurring argument against the use of gender-inclusive German is that it supposedly makes written texts too long and complicated. It is also argued that gender-inclusive language has negative effects on language learners. However, such effects are only likely if gender-inclusive texts are very different from those that are not gender-inclusive. In our corpus-linguistic study, we manually annotated German press texts to identify the parts that would have to be changed. Our results show that, on average, less than 1% of all tokens would be affected by gender-inclusive language. This small proportion calls into question whether gender-inclusive German presents a substantial barrier to understanding and learning the language, particularly when we take into account the potential complexities of interpreting masculine generics.

Related papers

• Adapting Psycholinguistic Research for LLMs: Gender-inclusive Language in a Coreference Context [0.9831489366502298]
  This study examines whether Large Language Models interpret gender-inclusive language neutrally. In English, LLMs generally maintain the antecedent's gender but exhibit underlying masculine bias. In German, this bias is much stronger, overriding all tested gender-neutralization strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T18:42:11Z)
• mGeNTE: A Multilingual Resource for Gender-Neutral Language and Translation [21.461095625903504]
  mGeNTE is a dataset of English-Italian/German/Spanish language pairs. It enables research in both automatic Gender-Neutral Translation (GNT) and language modelling for three grammatical gender languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T09:35:15Z)
• The Lou Dataset -- Exploring the Impact of Gender-Fair Language in German Text Classification [57.06913662622832]
  Gender-fair language fosters inclusion by addressing all genders or using neutral forms. Gender-fair language substantially impacts predictions by flipping labels, reducing certainty, and altering attention patterns. While we offer initial insights on the effect on German text classification, the findings likely apply to other languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T15:08:17Z)
• Beyond Binary Gender: Evaluating Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous Attitude Words [85.48043537327258]
  Existing machine translation gender bias evaluations are primarily focused on male and female genders. This study presents a benchmark AmbGIMT (Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous attitude words) We propose a novel process to evaluate gender bias based on the Emotional Attitude Score (EAS), which is used to quantify ambiguous attitude words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T08:13:51Z)
• Building Bridges: A Dataset for Evaluating Gender-Fair Machine Translation into German [17.924716793621627]
  We study gender-fair language in English-to-German machine translation (MT) We conduct the first benchmark study involving two commercial systems and six neural MT models. Our findings show that most systems produce mainly masculine forms and rarely gender-neutral variants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T09:39:19Z)
• Shifting social norms as a driving force for linguistic change: Struggles about language and gender in the German Bundestag [0.0]
  We show that language and gender has been a recurring issue in the German Bundestag since the 1980s. We demonstrate how this is reflected in linguistic practices of the Bundestag. We will discuss implications of these earlier language battles for the currently very heated debate about gender-inclusive language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T10:49:28Z)
• Analyzing Gender Representation in Multilingual Models [59.21915055702203]
  We focus on the representation of gender distinctions as a practical case study. We examine the extent to which the gender concept is encoded in shared subspaces across different languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-20T00:13:01Z)
• They, Them, Theirs: Rewriting with Gender-Neutral English [56.14842450974887]
  We perform a case study on the singular they, a common way to promote gender inclusion in English. We show how a model can be trained to produce gender-neutral English with 1% word error rate with no human-labeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T21:47:48Z)
• Gender in Danger? Evaluating Speech Translation Technology on the MuST-SHE Corpus [20.766890957411132]
  Translating from languages without productive grammatical gender like English into gender-marked languages is a well-known difficulty for machines. Can audio provide additional information to reduce gender bias? We present the first thorough investigation of gender bias in speech translation, contributing with the release of a benchmark useful for future studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T09:55:38Z)
• Multi-Dimensional Gender Bias Classification [67.65551687580552]
  Machine learning models can inadvertently learn socially undesirable patterns when training on gender biased text. We propose a general framework that decomposes gender bias in text along several pragmatic and semantic dimensions. Using this fine-grained framework, we automatically annotate eight large scale datasets with gender information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T21:23:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.