Making sense of violence risk predictions using clinical notes
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.13976v1
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:00:07 GMT
- Title: Making sense of violence risk predictions using clinical notes
- Authors: Pablo Mosteiro, Emil Rijcken, Kalliopi Zervanou, Uzay Kaymak, Floortje
Scheepers, Marco Spruit
- Abstract summary: Violence risk assessment in psychiatric institutions enables interventions to avoid violence incidents.
Previous studies have attempted to assess violence risk in psychiatric patients using such notes, with acceptable performance.
- Score: 0.988455728566886
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Violence risk assessment in psychiatric institutions enables interventions to
avoid violence incidents. Clinical notes written by practitioners and available
in electronic health records (EHR) are valuable resources that are seldom used
to their full potential. Previous studies have attempted to assess violence
risk in psychiatric patients using such notes, with acceptable performance.
However, they do not explain why classification works and how it can be
improved. We explore two methods to better understand the quality of a
classifier in the context of clinical note analysis: random forests using topic
models, and choice of evaluation metric. These methods allow us to understand
both our data and our methodology more profoundly, setting up the groundwork to
work on improved models that build upon this understanding. This is
particularly important when it comes to the generalizability of evaluated
classifiers to new data, a trustworthiness problem that is of great interest
due to the increased availability of new data in electronic format.
Related papers
- Towards objective and interpretable speech disorder assessment: a comparative analysis of CNN and transformer-based models [7.774205081900019]
Head and Neck Cancers (HNC) significantly impact patients' ability to speak, affecting their quality of life.
This study proposes a self-supervised Wav2Vec2-based model for phone classification with HNC patients, to enhance accuracy and improve the discrimination of phonetic features for subsequent interpretability purpose.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-07T08:51:52Z) - From Classification to Clinical Insights: Towards Analyzing and Reasoning About Mobile and Behavioral Health Data With Large Language Models [21.427976533706737]
We take a novel approach that leverages large language models to synthesize clinically useful insights from multi-sensor data.
We develop chain of thought prompting methods that use LLMs to generate reasoning about how trends in data relate to conditions like depression and anxiety.
We find models like GPT-4 correctly reference numerical data 75% of the time, and clinician participants express strong interest in using this approach to interpret self-tracking data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-21T23:53:27Z) - Classification of Dysarthria based on the Levels of Severity. A
Systematic Review [1.7624130429860712]
This systematic review aims to analyze current methodologies for classifying dysarthria based on severity levels.
We will systematically review the literature on the automatic classification of dysarthria severity levels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-11T07:40:46Z) - Informing clinical assessment by contextualizing post-hoc explanations
of risk prediction models in type-2 diabetes [50.8044927215346]
We consider a comorbidity risk prediction scenario and focus on contexts regarding the patients clinical state.
We employ several state-of-the-art LLMs to present contexts around risk prediction model inferences and evaluate their acceptability.
Our paper is one of the first end-to-end analyses identifying the feasibility and benefits of contextual explanations in a real-world clinical use case.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-11T18:07:11Z) - Benchmarking Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Models through the Lens of
Interpretability [82.29775890542967]
Estimating personalized effects of treatments is a complex, yet pervasive problem.
Recent developments in the machine learning literature on heterogeneous treatment effect estimation gave rise to many sophisticated, but opaque, tools.
We use post-hoc feature importance methods to identify features that influence the model's predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-16T17:59:05Z) - Machine Learning for Violence Risk Assessment Using Dutch Clinical Notes [0.988455728566886]
Violence risk assessment in psychiatric institutions enables interventions to avoid violence incidents.
We explore conventional and deep machine learning methods to assess violence risk in psychiatric patients using practitioner notes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-28T14:36:06Z) - Classifying Cyber-Risky Clinical Notes by Employing Natural Language
Processing [9.77063694539068]
Recently, some states within the United States of America require patients to have open access to their clinical notes.
This research investigates methods for identifying security/privacy risks within clinical notes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-24T00:36:59Z) - Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised
Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks.
Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets.
We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z) - Predictive Modeling of ICU Healthcare-Associated Infections from
Imbalanced Data. Using Ensembles and a Clustering-Based Undersampling
Approach [55.41644538483948]
This work is focused on both the identification of risk factors and the prediction of healthcare-associated infections in intensive-care units.
The aim is to support decision making addressed at reducing the incidence rate of infections.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-07T16:13:12Z) - Self-Training with Improved Regularization for Sample-Efficient Chest
X-Ray Classification [80.00316465793702]
We present a deep learning framework that enables robust modeling in challenging scenarios.
Our results show that using 85% lesser labeled data, we can build predictive models that match the performance of classifiers trained in a large-scale data setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-03T02:36:00Z) - Interpretable Off-Policy Evaluation in Reinforcement Learning by
Highlighting Influential Transitions [48.91284724066349]
Off-policy evaluation in reinforcement learning offers the chance of using observational data to improve future outcomes in domains such as healthcare and education.
Traditional measures such as confidence intervals may be insufficient due to noise, limited data and confounding.
We develop a method that could serve as a hybrid human-AI system, to enable human experts to analyze the validity of policy evaluation estimates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-10T00:26:43Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.