The Role of Pseudo-labels in Self-training Linear Classifiers on High-dimensional Gaussian Mixture Data
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.07739v3
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 11:22:49 GMT
- Title: The Role of Pseudo-labels in Self-training Linear Classifiers on High-dimensional Gaussian Mixture Data
- Authors: Takashi Takahashi,
- Abstract summary: Self-training (ST) is a simple yet effective semi-supervised learning method.
We show that ST improves generalization in different ways depending on the number of iterations.
- Score: 3.1274367448459253
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Self-training (ST) is a simple yet effective semi-supervised learning method. However, why and how ST improves generalization performance by using potentially erroneous pseudo-labels is still not well understood. To deepen the understanding of ST, we derive and analyze a sharp characterization of the behavior of iterative ST when training a linear classifier by minimizing the ridge-regularized convex loss on binary Gaussian mixtures, in the asymptotic limit where input dimension and data size diverge proportionally. The results show that ST improves generalization in different ways depending on the number of iterations. When the number of iterations is small, ST improves generalization performance by fitting the model to relatively reliable pseudo-labels and updating the model parameters by a large amount at each iteration. This suggests that ST works intuitively. On the other hand, with many iterations, ST can gradually improve the direction of the classification plane by updating the model parameters incrementally, using soft labels and small regularization. It is argued that this is because the small update of ST can extract information from the data in an almost noiseless way. However, in the presence of label imbalance, the generalization performance of ST underperforms supervised learning with true labels. To overcome this, two heuristics are proposed to enable ST to achieve nearly compatible performance with supervised learning even with significant label imbalance.
Related papers
- Smooth Pseudo-Labeling [4.1569253650826195]
A fruitful method in Semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) is Pseudo-Labeling (PL)
PL suffers from the important drawback that the associated loss function has discontinuities in its derivatives, which cause instabilities in performance when labels are very scarce.
We introduce a new benchmark, where labeled images are selected randomly from the whole dataset, without imposing representation of each class proportional to its frequency in the dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-23T08:33:07Z) - Rethinking Classifier Re-Training in Long-Tailed Recognition: A Simple
Logits Retargeting Approach [102.0769560460338]
We develop a simple logits approach (LORT) without the requirement of prior knowledge of the number of samples per class.
Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on various imbalanced datasets, including CIFAR100-LT, ImageNet-LT, and iNaturalist 2018.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-01T03:27:08Z) - Decoupled Prototype Learning for Reliable Test-Time Adaptation [50.779896759106784]
Test-time adaptation (TTA) is a task that continually adapts a pre-trained source model to the target domain during inference.
One popular approach involves fine-tuning model with cross-entropy loss according to estimated pseudo-labels.
This study reveals that minimizing the classification error of each sample causes the cross-entropy loss's vulnerability to label noise.
We propose a novel Decoupled Prototype Learning (DPL) method that features prototype-centric loss computation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-15T03:33:39Z) - All Points Matter: Entropy-Regularized Distribution Alignment for
Weakly-supervised 3D Segmentation [67.30502812804271]
Pseudo-labels are widely employed in weakly supervised 3D segmentation tasks where only sparse ground-truth labels are available for learning.
We propose a novel learning strategy to regularize the generated pseudo-labels and effectively narrow the gaps between pseudo-labels and model predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T08:19:31Z) - An Embarrassingly Simple Baseline for Imbalanced Semi-Supervised
Learning [103.65758569417702]
Semi-supervised learning (SSL) has shown great promise in leveraging unlabeled data to improve model performance.
We consider a more realistic and challenging setting called imbalanced SSL, where imbalanced class distributions occur in both labeled and unlabeled data.
We study a simple yet overlooked baseline -- SimiS -- which tackles data imbalance by simply supplementing labeled data with pseudo-labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-20T21:18:41Z) - Contrastive Regularization for Semi-Supervised Learning [46.020125061295886]
We propose contrastive regularization to improve both efficiency and accuracy of the consistency regularization by well-clustered features of unlabeled data.
Our method also shows robust performance on open-set semi-supervised learning where unlabeled data includes out-of-distribution samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-17T07:20:11Z) - Imputing Missing Observations with Time Sliced Synthetic Minority
Oversampling Technique [0.3973560285628012]
We present a simple yet novel time series imputation technique with the goal of constructing an irregular time series that is uniform across every sample in a data set.
We fix a grid defined by the midpoints of non-overlapping bins (dubbed "slices") of observation times and ensure that each sample has values for all of the features at that given time.
This allows one to both impute fully missing observations to allow uniform time series classification across the entire data and, in special cases, to impute individually missing features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-14T19:23:24Z) - Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Iterative
Semi-Supervised Learning [81.1071978288003]
In particular, we seek to understand the behaviour of the em generalization error of iterative SSL algorithms using information-theoretic principles.
Our theoretical results suggest that when the class conditional variances are not too large, the upper bound on the generalization error decreases monotonically with the number of iterations, but quickly saturates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-03T05:38:49Z) - In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label
Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learning [53.1047775185362]
Pseudo-labeling (PL) is a general SSL approach that does not have this constraint but performs relatively poorly in its original formulation.
We argue that PL underperforms due to the erroneous high confidence predictions from poorly calibrated models.
We propose an uncertainty-aware pseudo-label selection (UPS) framework which improves pseudo labeling accuracy by drastically reducing the amount of noise encountered in the training process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-15T23:29:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.