Cyber Risk Assessment for Capital Management

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.08435v4
• Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 18:56:11 GMT
• Title: Cyber Risk Assessment for Capital Management
• Authors: Wing Fung Chong, Runhuan Feng, Hins Hu, Linfeng Zhang,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a two-pillar cyber risk management framework to address the pervasive challenges in managing cyber risk.<n>The first pillar, cyber risk assessment, combines insurance frequency-severity models with cybersecurity cascade models to capture the unique nature of cyber risk.<n>The second pillar, cyber capital management, facilitates informed allocation of capital for a balanced cyber risk management strategy.
• Score: 8.807503512479427
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper introduces a two-pillar cyber risk management framework to address the pervasive challenges in managing cyber risk. The first pillar, cyber risk assessment, combines insurance frequency-severity models with cybersecurity cascade models to capture the unique nature of cyber risk. The second pillar, cyber capital management, facilitates informed allocation of capital for a balanced cyber risk management strategy, including cybersecurity investments, insurance coverage, and reserves. A case study, based on historical cyber incident data and realistic assumptions, demonstrates the necessity of comprehensive cost-benefit analysis for budget-constrained companies with competing objectives in cyber risk management. In addition, sensitivity analysis highlights the dependence of the optimal strategy on factors such as the price of cybersecurity controls and their effectiveness. The framework's implementation across a diverse range of companies yields general insights on cyber risk management.

Related papers

• Frontier AI's Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape [42.771086928042315]
  This paper presents an in-depth analysis of frontier AI's impact on cybersecurity. We first define and categorize the marginal risks of frontier AI in cybersecurity. We then systemically analyze the current and future impacts of frontier AI in cybersecurity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T18:25:18Z)
• Comprehensive Digital Forensics and Risk Mitigation Strategy for Modern Enterprises [0.0]
  This study outlines an approach to cybersecurity, including proactive threat anticipation, forensic investigations, and compliance with regulations like CCPA. Key threats such as social engineering, insider risks, phishing, and ransomware are examined, along with mitigation strategies leveraging AI and machine learning. The findings emphasize the importance of continuous monitoring, policy enforcement, and adaptive security measures to protect sensitive data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T23:18:49Z)
• Supply Chain Network Security Investment Strategies Based on Nonlinear Budget Constraints: The Moderating Roles of Market Share and Attack Risk [4.916547346134989]
  This study proposes a nonlin-ear budget-constrained cybersecurity investment optimization model. The model achieves high cybersecurity levels of 0.96 and 0.95 in the experimental sce-narios of two retailers and two demand markets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T11:37:58Z)
• Cyber Risk Taxonomies: Statistical Analysis of Cybersecurity Risk Classifications [0.0]
  We argue in favour of switching the attention from goodness-of-fit and in-sample performance, to focusing on the out-of sample forecasting performance. Our results indicate that business motivated cyber risk classifications appear to be too restrictive and not flexible enough to capture the heterogeneity of cyber risk events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T04:12:34Z)
• Disentangling the sources of cyber risk premia [0.0]
  We use a machine learning algorithm to quantify firms' cyber risks based on their disclosures and a dedicated cyber corpus. The model can identify paragraphs related to determined cyber-threat types and accordingly attribute several related cyber scores to the firm. Stocks with high cyber scores significantly outperform other stocks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T11:30:42Z)
• EARBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [53.717918131568936]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction.<n>Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results.<n>However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges.<n>This study introduces EARBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• QBER: Quantifying Cyber Risks for Strategic Decisions [0.0]
  We introduce QBER approach to offer decision-makers measurable risk metrics. The QBER evaluates losses from cyberattacks, performs detailed risk analyses based on existing cybersecurity measures, and provides thorough cost assessments. Our contributions involve outlining cyberattack probabilities and risks, identifying Technical, Economic, and Legal (TEL) impacts, creating a model to gauge impacts, suggesting risk mitigation strategies, and examining trends and challenges in implementing widespread Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T14:25:58Z)
• Mind the Gap: Securely modeling cyber risk based on security deviations from a peer group [2.7910505923792646]
  This paper proposes a new framework for cyber posture against peers and estimating cyber risk within specific economic sectors. We introduce a new top-line variable called the Defense Gap Index representing the weighted security gap between an organization and its peers. We apply this approach in a specific sector using data collected from 25 large firms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T17:22:45Z)
• Decision-Making Frameworks for Network Resilience -- Managing and Mitigating Systemic (Cyber) Risk [44.99833362998488]
  We introduce a decision-making framework tailored for the management of systemic risk in networks. This framework is constructed upon three fundamental components: (1) a set of acceptable network configurations, (2) a set of interventions aimed at risk mitigation, and (3) a cost function quantifying the expenses associated with these interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T14:29:04Z)
• Purple Llama CyberSecEval: A Secure Coding Benchmark for Language Models [41.068780235482514]
  This paper presents CyberSecEval, a comprehensive benchmark developed to help bolster the cybersecurity of Large Language Models (LLMs) employed as coding assistants. CyberSecEval provides a thorough evaluation of LLMs in two crucial security domains: their propensity to generate insecure code and their level of compliance when asked to assist in cyberattacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T22:07:54Z)
• RiskQ: Risk-sensitive Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Value Factorization [49.26510528455664]
  We introduce the Risk-sensitive Individual-Global-Max (RIGM) principle as a generalization of the Individual-Global-Max (IGM) and Distributional IGM (DIGM) principles. We show that RiskQ can obtain promising performance through extensive experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T07:18:36Z)
• RCVaR: an Economic Approach to Estimate Cyberattacks Costs using Data from Industry Reports [8.45831177335402]
  This article introduces the Real Cyber Value at Risk (RCVaR), an economical approach for estimating cybersecurity costs. RCVaR identifies the most significant cyber risk factors from various sources and combines their quantitative results to estimate specific cyberattacks costs for companies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T17:52:47Z)
• Graph Mining for Cybersecurity: A Survey [61.505995908021525]
  The explosive growth of cyber attacks nowadays, such as malware, spam, and intrusions, caused severe consequences on society. Traditional Machine Learning (ML) based methods are extensively used in detecting cyber threats, but they hardly model the correlations between real-world cyber entities. With the proliferation of graph mining techniques, many researchers investigated these techniques for capturing correlations between cyber entities and achieving high performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-02T08:43:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.