Covariance Matrix Adaptation MAP-Annealing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.10752v4
• Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 00:16:23 GMT
• Title: Covariance Matrix Adaptation MAP-Annealing
• Authors: Matthew C. Fontaine, Stefanos Nikolaidis
• Abstract summary: We propose a new quality diversity algorithm, Covariance Matrix Adaptation MAP-Annealing (CMA-MAE) We provide theoretical justifications for the new algorithm with respect to each limitation. Our theory informs our experiments, which show that CMA-MAE achieves state-of-the-art performance and robustness.
• Score: 5.5216935362914485
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Single-objective optimization algorithms search for the single highest-quality solution with respect to an objective. Quality diversity (QD) optimization algorithms, such as Covariance Matrix Adaptation MAP-Elites (CMA-ME), search for a collection of solutions that are both high-quality with respect to an objective and diverse with respect to specified measure functions. However, CMA-ME suffers from three major limitations highlighted by the QD community: prematurely abandoning the objective in favor of exploration, struggling to explore flat objectives, and having poor performance for low-resolution archives. We propose a new quality diversity algorithm, Covariance Matrix Adaptation MAP-Annealing (CMA-MAE), that addresses all three limitations. We provide theoretical justifications for the new algorithm with respect to each limitation. Our theory informs our experiments, which support the theory and show that CMA-MAE achieves state-of-the-art performance and robustness.

Related papers

• Multi-Objective Covariance Matrix Adaptation MAP-Annealing [7.103319934188755]
  Quality-Diversity (QD) optimization is an emerging field that focuses on finding a set of behaviorally diverse and high-quality solutions.<n>Recent work on Multi-Objective Quality-Diversity (MOQD) extends QD optimization to simultaneously optimize multiple objective functions.<n>This opens up multi-objective applications for QD, such as generating a diverse set of game maps that maximize difficulty, realism, or other properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T04:39:28Z)
• Scalable Min-Max Optimization via Primal-Dual Exact Pareto Optimization [66.51747366239299]
  We propose a smooth variant of the min-max problem based on the augmented Lagrangian. The proposed algorithm scales better with the number of objectives than subgradient-based strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-16T11:05:51Z)
• Preference-Conditioned Gradient Variations for Multi-Objective Quality-Diversity [7.799824794686343]
  We introduce a new Multi-Objective Quality-Diversity algorithm with preference-conditioned policy-gradient mutations. Our method achieves a smoother set of trade-offs, as measured by newly-proposed sparsity-based metrics. This performance comes at a lower computational storage cost compared to previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T11:50:03Z)
• LLaMA-Berry: Pairwise Optimization for O1-like Olympiad-Level Mathematical Reasoning [56.273799410256075]
  The framework combines Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with iterative Self-Refine to optimize the reasoning path. The framework has been tested on general and advanced benchmarks, showing superior performance in terms of search efficiency and problem-solving capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T18:12:29Z)
• Modified CMA-ES Algorithm for Multi-Modal Optimization: Incorporating Niching Strategies and Dynamic Adaptation Mechanism [0.03495246564946555]
  This study modifies the Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) algorithm for multi-modal optimization problems. The enhancements focus on addressing the challenges of multiple global minima, improving the algorithm's ability to maintain diversity and explore complex fitness landscapes. We incorporate niching strategies and dynamic adaptation mechanisms to refine the algorithm's performance in identifying and optimizing multiple global optima.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T03:41:39Z)
• Sample-Efficient Multi-Agent RL: An Optimization Perspective [103.35353196535544]
  We study multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) for the general-sum Markov Games (MGs) under the general function approximation. We introduce a novel complexity measure called the Multi-Agent Decoupling Coefficient (MADC) for general-sum MGs. We show that our algorithm provides comparable sublinear regret to the existing works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T01:39:04Z)
• ARES: An Efficient Algorithm with Recurrent Evaluation and Sampling-Driven Inference for Maximum Independent Set [48.57120672468062]
  This paper introduces an efficient algorithm for the Maximum Independent Set (MIS) problem, incorporating two innovative techniques. The proposed algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms in terms of solution quality, computational efficiency, and stability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-16T14:39:38Z)
• Multi-Objective Quality Diversity Optimization [2.4608515808275455]
  We propose an extension of the MAP-Elites algorithm in the multi-objective setting: Multi-Objective MAP-Elites (MOME) Namely, it combines the diversity inherited from the MAP-Elites grid algorithm with the strength of multi-objective optimizations. We evaluate our method on several tasks, from standard optimization problems to robotics simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T10:48:28Z)
• A survey on multi-objective hyperparameter optimization algorithms for Machine Learning [62.997667081978825]
  This article presents a systematic survey of the literature published between 2014 and 2020 on multi-objective HPO algorithms. We distinguish between metaheuristic-based algorithms, metamodel-based algorithms, and approaches using a mixture of both. We also discuss the quality metrics used to compare multi-objective HPO procedures and present future research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-23T10:22:30Z)
• Result Diversification by Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms with Theoretical Guarantees [94.72461292387146]
  We propose to reformulate the result diversification problem as a bi-objective search problem, and solve it by a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (EA) We theoretically prove that the GSEMO can achieve the optimal-time approximation ratio, $1/2$. When the objective function changes dynamically, the GSEMO can maintain this approximation ratio in running time, addressing the open question proposed by Borodin et al.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T14:00:22Z)
• AP-Loss for Accurate One-Stage Object Detection [49.13608882885456]
  One-stage object detectors are trained by optimizing classification-loss and localization-loss simultaneously. The former suffers much from extreme foreground-background imbalance due to the large number of anchors. This paper proposes a novel framework to replace the classification task in one-stage detectors with a ranking task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-17T13:22:01Z)
• Follow the bisector: a simple method for multi-objective optimization [65.83318707752385]
  We consider optimization problems, where multiple differentiable losses have to be minimized. The presented method computes descent direction in every iteration to guarantee equal relative decrease of objective functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T09:50:33Z)
• Decomposition in Decision and Objective Space for Multi-Modal Multi-Objective Optimization [15.681236469530397]
  Multi-modal multi-objective optimization problems (MMMOPs) have multiple subsets within the Pareto-optimal Set. Prevalent multi-objective evolutionary algorithms are not purely designed to search for multiple solution subsets, whereas, algorithms designed for MMMOPs demonstrate degraded performance in the objective space. This motivates the design of better algorithms for addressing MMMOPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-04T03:18:47Z)
• Hybrid Adaptive Evolutionary Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization [0.0]
  This paper proposed a new Multi-objective Algorithm as an extension of the Hybrid Adaptive Evolutionary algorithm (HAEA) called MoHAEA. MoHAEA is compared with four states of the art MOEAs, namely MOEA/D, pa$lambda$-MOEA/D, MOEA/D-AWA, and NSGA-II.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T02:16:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.