How Much is Enough? A Study on Diffusion Times in Score-based Generative Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.05173v1
• Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:09:46 GMT
• Title: How Much is Enough? A Study on Diffusion Times in Score-based Generative Models
• Authors: Giulio Franzese and Simone Rossi and Lixuan Yang and Alessandro Finamore and Dario Rossi and Maurizio Filippone and Pietro Michiardi
• Abstract summary: Current best practice advocates for a large T to ensure that the forward dynamics brings the diffusion sufficiently close to a known and simple noise distribution. We show how an auxiliary model can be used to bridge the gap between the ideal and the simulated forward dynamics, followed by a standard reverse diffusion process.
• Score: 76.76860707897413
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Score-based diffusion models are a class of generative models whose dynamics is described by stochastic differential equations that map noise into data. While recent works have started to lay down a theoretical foundation for these models, an analytical understanding of the role of the diffusion time T is still lacking. Current best practice advocates for a large T to ensure that the forward dynamics brings the diffusion sufficiently close to a known and simple noise distribution; however, a smaller value of T should be preferred for a better approximation of the score-matching objective and higher computational efficiency. Starting from a variational interpretation of diffusion models, in this work we quantify this trade-off, and suggest a new method to improve quality and efficiency of both training and sampling, by adopting smaller diffusion times. Indeed, we show how an auxiliary model can be used to bridge the gap between the ideal and the simulated forward dynamics, followed by a standard reverse diffusion process. Empirical results support our analysis; for image data, our method is competitive w.r.t. the state-of-the-art, according to standard sample quality metrics and log-likelihood.

Related papers

• Diffusion Attribution Score: Evaluating Training Data Influence in Diffusion Model [22.39558434131574]
  Existing data attribution methods for diffusion models typically quantify the contribution of a training sample. We argue that the direct usage of diffusion loss cannot represent such a contribution accurately due to the calculation of diffusion loss. We aim to measure the direct comparison between predicted distributions with an attribution score to analyse the training sample importance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T10:58:17Z)
• Provable Statistical Rates for Consistency Diffusion Models [87.28777947976573]
  Despite the state-of-the-art performance, diffusion models are known for their slow sample generation due to the extensive number of steps involved. This paper contributes towards the first statistical theory for consistency models, formulating their training as a distribution discrepancy minimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T20:34:18Z)
• Unveil Conditional Diffusion Models with Classifier-free Guidance: A Sharp Statistical Theory [87.00653989457834]
  Conditional diffusion models serve as the foundation of modern image synthesis and find extensive application in fields like computational biology and reinforcement learning. Despite the empirical success, theory of conditional diffusion models is largely missing. This paper bridges the gap by presenting a sharp statistical theory of distribution estimation using conditional diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T17:08:24Z)
• Data Attribution for Diffusion Models: Timestep-induced Bias in Influence Estimation [53.27596811146316]
  Diffusion models operate over a sequence of timesteps instead of instantaneous input-output relationships in previous contexts. We present Diffusion-TracIn that incorporates this temporal dynamics and observe that samples' loss gradient norms are highly dependent on timestep. We introduce Diffusion-ReTrac as a re-normalized adaptation that enables the retrieval of training samples more targeted to the test sample of interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T07:58:18Z)
• Unmasking Bias in Diffusion Model Training [40.90066994983719]
  Denoising diffusion models have emerged as a dominant approach for image generation. They still suffer from slow convergence in training and color shift issues in sampling. In this paper, we identify that these obstacles can be largely attributed to bias and suboptimality inherent in the default training paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T16:04:41Z)
• Soft Mixture Denoising: Beyond the Expressive Bottleneck of Diffusion Models [76.46246743508651]
  We show that current diffusion models actually have an expressive bottleneck in backward denoising. We introduce soft mixture denoising (SMD), an expressive and efficient model for backward denoising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T12:03:32Z)
• Diffusion Models are Minimax Optimal Distribution Estimators [49.47503258639454]
  We provide the first rigorous analysis on approximation and generalization abilities of diffusion modeling. We show that when the true density function belongs to the Besov space and the empirical score matching loss is properly minimized, the generated data distribution achieves the nearly minimax optimal estimation rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T11:31:55Z)
• Information-Theoretic Diffusion [18.356162596599436]
  Denoising diffusion models have spurred significant gains in density modeling and image generation. We introduce a new mathematical foundation for diffusion models inspired by classic results in information theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-07T23:03:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.