Generalizing experimental findings: identification beyond adjustments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.06699v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 09:00:17 GMT
• Title: Generalizing experimental findings: identification beyond adjustments
• Authors: Juha Karvanen
• Abstract summary: We aim to generalize the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to a target population with the help of some observational data. We consider examples where the experimental findings cannot be generalized by an adjustment. We show that the generalization may still be possible by other identification strategies that can be derived by applying do-calculus.
• Score: 2.5889737226898437
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We aim to generalize the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to a target population with the help of some observational data. This is a problem of causal effect identification with multiple data sources. Challenges arise when the RCT is conducted in a context that differs from the target population. Earlier research has focused on cases where the estimates from the RCT can be adjusted by observational data in order to remove the selection bias and other domain specific differences. We consider examples where the experimental findings cannot be generalized by an adjustment and show that the generalization may still be possible by other identification strategies that can be derived by applying do-calculus. The obtained identifying functionals for these examples contain trapdoor variables of a new type. The value of a trapdoor variable needs to be fixed in the estimation and the choice of the value may have a major effect on the bias and accuracy of estimates, which is also seen in simulations. The presented results expand the scope of settings where the generalization of experimental findings is doable

Related papers

• Local Learning for Covariate Selection in Nonparametric Causal Effect Estimation with Latent Variables [13.12743473333296]
  Estimating causal effects from nonexperimental data is a fundamental problem in many fields of science. We propose a novel local learning approach for covariate selection in nonparametric causal effect estimation. We validate our algorithm through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T12:08:54Z)
• Detecting and Identifying Selection Structure in Sequential Data [53.24493902162797]
  We argue that the selective inclusion of data points based on latent objectives is common in practical situations, such as music sequences. We show that selection structure is identifiable without any parametric assumptions or interventional experiments. We also propose a provably correct algorithm to detect and identify selection structures as well as other types of dependencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-29T20:56:34Z)
• Identification of Single-Treatment Effects in Factorial Experiments [0.0]
  I show that when multiple interventions are randomized in experiments, the effect any single intervention would have outside the experimental setting is not identified absent heroic assumptions. observational studies and factorial experiments provide information about potential-outcome distributions with zero and multiple interventions. I show that researchers who rely on this type of design have to justify either linearity of functional forms or specify with Directed Acyclic Graphs how variables are related in the real world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T04:01:53Z)
• Approximating Counterfactual Bounds while Fusing Observational, Biased and Randomised Data Sources [64.96984404868411]
  We address the problem of integrating data from multiple, possibly biased, observational and interventional studies. We show that the likelihood of the available data has no local maxima. We then show how the same approach can address the general case of multiple datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T11:28:24Z)
• The interventional Bayesian Gaussian equivalent score for Bayesian causal inference with unknown soft interventions [0.0]
  In certain settings, such as genomics, we may have data from heterogeneous study conditions, with soft (partial) interventions only pertaining to a subset of the study variables. We define the interventional BGe score for a mixture of observational and interventional data, where the targets and effects of intervention may be unknown.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T12:32:08Z)
• Equivariance Allows Handling Multiple Nuisance Variables When Analyzing Pooled Neuroimaging Datasets [53.34152466646884]
  In this paper, we show how bringing recent results on equivariant representation learning instantiated on structured spaces together with simple use of classical results on causal inference provides an effective practical solution. We demonstrate how our model allows dealing with more than one nuisance variable under some assumptions and can enable analysis of pooled scientific datasets in scenarios that would otherwise entail removing a large portion of the samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T04:54:06Z)
• Typing assumptions improve identification in causal discovery [123.06886784834471]
  Causal discovery from observational data is a challenging task to which an exact solution cannot always be identified. We propose a new set of assumptions that constrain possible causal relationships based on the nature of the variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-22T14:23:08Z)
• Multi-Source Causal Inference Using Control Variates [81.57072928775509]
  We propose a general algorithm to estimate causal effects from emphmultiple data sources. We show theoretically that this reduces the variance of the ATE estimate. We apply this framework to inference from observational data under an outcome selection bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-30T21:20:51Z)
• Deconfounded Score Method: Scoring DAGs with Dense Unobserved Confounding [101.35070661471124]
  We show that unobserved confounding leaves a characteristic footprint in the observed data distribution that allows for disentangling spurious and causal effects. We propose an adjusted score-based causal discovery algorithm that may be implemented with general-purpose solvers and scales to high-dimensional problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-28T11:07:59Z)
• Learning Adjustment Sets from Observational and Limited Experimental Data [9.028773906859541]
  We introduce a method that combines large observational and limited experimental data to identify adjustment sets. The method successfully identifies adjustment sets and improves causal effect estimation in simulated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T14:23:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.