Improving Clinical Efficiency and Reducing Medical Errors through
NLP-enabled diagnosis of Health Conditions from Transcription Reports
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.13516v1
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 06:37:15 GMT
- Title: Improving Clinical Efficiency and Reducing Medical Errors through
NLP-enabled diagnosis of Health Conditions from Transcription Reports
- Abstract summary: Misdiagnosis rates are one of the leading causes of medical errors in hospitals, affecting over 12 million adults across the US.
This study utilizes 4 NLP-based algorithms to determine the appropriate health condition based on an unstructured transcription report.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Misdiagnosis rates are one of the leading causes of medical errors in
hospitals, affecting over 12 million adults across the US. To address the high
rate of misdiagnosis, this study utilizes 4 NLP-based algorithms to determine
the appropriate health condition based on an unstructured transcription report.
From the Logistic Regression, Random Forest, LSTM, and CNNLSTM models, the
CNN-LSTM model performed the best with an accuracy of 97.89%. We packaged this
model into a authenticated web platform for accessible assistance to
clinicians. Overall, by standardizing health care diagnosis and structuring
transcription reports, our NLP platform drastically improves the clinical
efficiency and accuracy of hospitals worldwide.
Related papers
- Beyond Scalar Scores: Exploring LLM-based Metrics for Clinical Significance Evaluation in Radiology Reports [49.5225801722164]
Existing metrics obscure this requirement by reducing report quality to a medically ungrounded scalar.<n>We study this boundary using ReEvalMed benchmark as testbed and evaluate metric-level clinical significance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-17T08:10:30Z) - LiveClin: A Live Clinical Benchmark without Leakage [50.45415584327275]
LiveClin is a live benchmark designed for approximating real-world clinical practice.<n>We transform authentic patient cases into complex, multimodal evaluation scenarios that span the entire clinical pathway.<n>Our evaluation of 26 models on LiveClin reveals the profound difficulty of these real-world scenarios, with the top-performing model achieving a Case Accuracy of just 35.7%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-18T03:59:46Z) - A Federated and Parameter-Efficient Framework for Large Language Model Training in Medicine [59.78991974851707]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on medical benchmarks, including question answering and diagnosis.<n>Most medical LLMs are trained on data from a single institution, which faces limitations in generalizability and safety in heterogeneous systems.<n>We introduce the model-agnostic and parameter-efficient federated learning framework for adapting LLMs to medical applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T18:48:21Z) - From Scores to Steps: Diagnosing and Improving LLM Performance in Evidence-Based Medical Calculations [45.414878840652115]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated promising performance on medical benchmarks.<n>However, their ability to perform medical calculations remains underexplored and poorly evaluated.<n>In this work, we revisit medical calculation evaluation with a stronger focus on clinical trustworthiness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-20T09:10:26Z) - A Disease-Centric Vision-Language Foundation Model for Precision Oncology in Kidney Cancer [54.58205672910646]
RenalCLIP is a visual-language foundation model for characterization, diagnosis and prognosis of renal mass.<n>It achieved better performance and superior generalizability across 10 core tasks spanning the full clinical workflow of kidney cancer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-22T17:48:19Z) - PathBench: A comprehensive comparison benchmark for pathology foundation models towards precision oncology [33.51485504161335]
We present PathBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for pathology foundation models (PFMs)<n>Our framework incorporates large-scale data, enabling objective comparison of PFMs.<n>We have collected 15,888 WSIs from 8,549 patients across 10 hospitals, encompassing over 64 diagnosis and prognosis tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T16:42:22Z) - MedCaseReasoning: Evaluating and learning diagnostic reasoning from clinical case reports [49.00805568780791]
We introduce MedCaseReasoning, the first open-access dataset for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) on their ability to align with clinician-authored diagnostic reasoning.<n>The dataset includes 14,489 diagnostic question-and-answer cases, each paired with detailed reasoning statements.<n>We evaluate state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs on MedCaseReasoning and find significant shortcomings in their diagnoses and reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-16T22:34:36Z) - ChestX-Reasoner: Advancing Radiology Foundation Models with Reasoning through Step-by-Step Verification [57.22053411719822]
ChestX-Reasoner is a radiology diagnosis MLLM designed to leverage process supervision mined directly from clinical reports.
Our two-stage training framework combines supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning guided by process rewards to better align model reasoning with clinical standards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-29T16:48:23Z) - A Clinician-Friendly Platform for Ophthalmic Image Analysis Without Technical Barriers [51.45596445363302]
GlobeReady is a clinician-friendly AI platform that enables fundus disease diagnosis without retraining, fine-tuning, or the needs for technical expertise.<n>We demonstrate high accuracy across imaging modalities: 93.9-98.5% for 11 fundus diseases using color fundus photographs (CPFs) and 87.2-92.7% for 15 fundus diseases using optic coherence tomography ( OCT) scans.<n>By leveraging training-free local feature augmentation, GlobeReady platform effectively mitigates domain shifts across centers and populations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-22T14:17:22Z) - Leveraging Multimodal Models for Enhanced Neuroimaging Diagnostics in Alzheimer's Disease [0.7696359453385685]
This paper generates synthetic diagnostic reports using GPT-4o-mini on structured data from the OASIS-4 dataset.
Using the synthetic reports as ground truth for training and validation, we then generated neurological reports directly from the images in the dataset.
Our proposed method achieved a BLEU-4 score of 0.1827, ROUGE-L score of 0.3719, and METEOR score of 0.4163, revealing its potential in generating clinically relevant and accurate diagnostic reports.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-12T15:28:06Z) - Novel Development of LLM Driven mCODE Data Model for Improved Clinical Trial Matching to Enable Standardization and Interoperability in Oncology Research [0.15346678870160887]
Cancer costs reaching over $208 billion in 2023 alone.
Traditional methods regarding clinical trial enrollment and clinical care in oncology are often manual, time-consuming, and lack a data-driven approach.
This paper presents a novel framework to streamline standardization, interoperability, and exchange of cancer domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T17:31:35Z) - Fine-Tuning In-House Large Language Models to Infer Differential Diagnosis from Radiology Reports [1.5972172622800358]
This study introduces a pipeline for developing in-house LLMs tailored to identify differential diagnoses from radiology reports.
evaluated on a set of 1,067 reports annotated by clinicians, the proposed model achieves an average F1 score of 92.1%, which is on par with GPT-4.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T20:16:25Z) - SemioLLM: Evaluating Large Language Models for Diagnostic Reasoning from Unstructured Clinical Narratives in Epilepsy [45.2233252981348]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to encode clinical knowledge.
We present SemioLLM, an evaluation framework that benchmarks 6 state-of-the-art models.
We show that most LLMs are able to accurately and confidently generate probabilistic predictions of seizure onset zones in the brain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-03T11:02:12Z) - ChatRadio-Valuer: A Chat Large Language Model for Generalizable
Radiology Report Generation Based on Multi-institution and Multi-system Data [115.0747462486285]
ChatRadio-Valuer is a tailored model for automatic radiology report generation that learns generalizable representations.
The clinical dataset utilized in this study encompasses a remarkable total of textbf332,673 observations.
ChatRadio-Valuer consistently outperforms state-of-the-art models, especially ChatGPT (GPT-3.5-Turbo) and GPT-4 et al.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-08T17:23:17Z) - A Transformer-based representation-learning model with unified
processing of multimodal input for clinical diagnostics [63.106382317917344]
We report a Transformer-based representation-learning model as a clinical diagnostic aid that processes multimodal input in a unified manner.
The unified model outperformed an image-only model and non-unified multimodal diagnosis models in the identification of pulmonary diseases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-01T16:23:47Z) - Large Language Models for Healthcare Data Augmentation: An Example on
Patient-Trial Matching [49.78442796596806]
We propose an innovative privacy-aware data augmentation approach for patient-trial matching (LLM-PTM)
Our experiments demonstrate a 7.32% average improvement in performance using the proposed LLM-PTM method, and the generalizability to new data is improved by 12.12%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-24T03:14:00Z) - SPeC: A Soft Prompt-Based Calibration on Performance Variability of
Large Language Model in Clinical Notes Summarization [50.01382938451978]
We introduce a model-agnostic pipeline that employs soft prompts to diminish variance while preserving the advantages of prompt-based summarization.
Experimental findings indicate that our method not only bolsters performance but also effectively curbs variance for various language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-23T04:47:46Z) - UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced
Data [81.00385374948125]
We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model.
UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data.
We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD)
UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z) - Predicting Clinical Diagnosis from Patients Electronic Health Records
Using BERT-based Neural Networks [62.9447303059342]
We show the importance of this problem in medical community.
We present a modification of Bidirectional Representations from Transformers (BERT) model for classification sequence.
We use a large-scale Russian EHR dataset consisting of about 4 million unique patient visits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-15T09:22:55Z) - Natural Language Processing with Deep Learning for Medical Adverse Event
Detection from Free-Text Medical Narratives: A Case Study of Detecting Total
Hip Replacement Dislocation [0.0]
We propose deep learning based NLP (DL-NLP) models for efficient and accurate hip dislocation AE detection following total hip replacement.
We benchmarked these proposed models with a wide variety of traditional machine learning based NLP (ML-NLP) models.
All DL-NLP models out-performed all of the ML-NLP models, with a convolutional neural network (CNN) model achieving the best overall performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-17T16:25:36Z) - Natural language processing of MIMIC-III clinical notes for identifying
diagnosis and procedures with neural networks [0.0]
We report the performance of a natural language processing model that can map clinical notes to medical codes.
We employed state-of-the-art deep learning method, ULMFiT on the largest emergency department clinical notes dataset MIMIC III.
Our models were able to predict the top-10 diagnoses and procedures with 80.3% and 80.5% accuracy, whereas the top-50 ICD-9 codes of diagnosis and procedures are predicted with 70.7% and 63.9% accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-28T04:05:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.