Should All Proposals be Treated Equally in Object Detection?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.03520v1
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 18:26:32 GMT
- Title: Should All Proposals be Treated Equally in Object Detection?
- Authors: Yunsheng Li, Yinpeng Chen, Xiyang Dai, Dongdong Chen, Mengchen Liu,
Pei Yu, Jing Yin, Lu Yuan, Zicheng Liu, Nuno Vasconcelos
- Abstract summary: The complexity-precision trade-off of an object detector is a critical problem for resource constrained vision tasks.
It is hypothesized that improved detection efficiency requires a paradigm shift, towards the unequal processing of proposals.
This results in better utilization of available computational budget, enabling higher accuracy for the same FLOPS.
- Score: 110.27485090952385
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The complexity-precision trade-off of an object detector is a critical
problem for resource constrained vision tasks. Previous works have emphasized
detectors implemented with efficient backbones. The impact on this trade-off of
proposal processing by the detection head is investigated in this work. It is
hypothesized that improved detection efficiency requires a paradigm shift,
towards the unequal processing of proposals, assigning more computation to good
proposals than poor ones. This results in better utilization of available
computational budget, enabling higher accuracy for the same FLOPS. We formulate
this as a learning problem where the goal is to assign operators to proposals,
in the detection head, so that the total computational cost is constrained and
the precision is maximized. The key finding is that such matching can be
learned as a function that maps each proposal embedding into a one-hot code
over operators. While this function induces a complex dynamic network routing
mechanism, it can be implemented by a simple MLP and learned end-to-end with
off-the-shelf object detectors. This 'dynamic proposal processing' (DPP) is
shown to outperform state-of-the-art end-to-end object detectors (DETR, Sparse
R-CNN) by a clear margin for a given computational complexity.
Related papers
- An Algorithm and Complexity Results for Causal Unit Selection [16.307996243413967]
Unit selection problem aims to identify objects, called units, that are most likely to exhibit a desired mode of behavior when subjected to stimuli.
We propose the first exact algorithm for finding optimal units given a broad class of causal objective functions and a fully specified structural causal model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-28T08:46:51Z) - Transformer-based assignment decision network for multiple object
tracking [0.0]
We introduce Transformer-based Assignment Decision Network (TADN) that tackles data association without the need of explicit optimization during inference.
Our proposed approach outperforms the state-of-the-art in most evaluation metrics despite its simple nature as a tracker.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-06T19:47:32Z) - ReAct: Temporal Action Detection with Relational Queries [84.76646044604055]
This work aims at advancing temporal action detection (TAD) using an encoder-decoder framework with action queries.
We first propose a relational attention mechanism in the decoder, which guides the attention among queries based on their relations.
Lastly, we propose to predict the localization quality of each action query at inference in order to distinguish high-quality queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-14T17:46:37Z) - Task-Oriented Sensing, Computation, and Communication Integration for
Multi-Device Edge AI [108.08079323459822]
This paper studies a new multi-intelligent edge artificial-latency (AI) system, which jointly exploits the AI model split inference and integrated sensing and communication (ISAC)
We measure the inference accuracy by adopting an approximate but tractable metric, namely discriminant gain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-03T06:57:07Z) - NoisyCUR: An algorithm for two-cost budgeted matrix completion [13.094997642327371]
Matrix completion is a ubiquitous tool in machine learning and data analysis.
We introduce a regression-based completion algorithm for this setting.
We experimentally verify the performance of our approach on both synthetic and real data sets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-16T10:39:56Z) - AmphibianDetector: adaptive computation for moving objects detection [0.913755431537592]
We propose an approach to object detection which makes it possible to reduce the number of false-positive detections.
The proposed approach is a modification of CNN already trained for object detection task.
The efficiency of the proposed approach was demonstrated on the open dataset "CDNet2014 pedestrian"
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-15T12:37:44Z) - Global Optimization of Objective Functions Represented by ReLU Networks [77.55969359556032]
Neural networks can learn complex, non- adversarial functions, and it is challenging to guarantee their correct behavior in safety-critical contexts.
Many approaches exist to find failures in networks (e.g., adversarial examples), but these cannot guarantee the absence of failures.
We propose an approach that integrates the optimization process into the verification procedure, achieving better performance than the naive approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-07T08:19:48Z) - Adaptive Sampling for Best Policy Identification in Markov Decision
Processes [79.4957965474334]
We investigate the problem of best-policy identification in discounted Markov Decision (MDPs) when the learner has access to a generative model.
The advantages of state-of-the-art algorithms are discussed and illustrated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-28T15:22:24Z) - AQD: Towards Accurate Fully-Quantized Object Detection [94.06347866374927]
We propose an Accurate Quantized object Detection solution, termed AQD, to get rid of floating-point computation.
Our AQD achieves comparable or even better performance compared with the full-precision counterpart under extremely low-bit schemes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-14T09:07:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.