Social media sharing by political elites: An asymmetric American exceptionalism

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.06313v1
• Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:03:47 GMT
• Title: Social media sharing by political elites: An asymmetric American exceptionalism
• Abstract summary: We show that from 2016 onward, members of the Republican party in the U.S. Congress have been increasingly sharing links to untrustworthy sources. The proportion of untrustworthy information posted by Republicans versus Democrats is diverging at an accelerating rate.
• Score: 1.7292236187135732
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Increased sharing of untrustworthy information on social media platforms is one of the main challenges of our modern information society. Because information disseminated by political elites is known to shape citizen and media discourse, it is particularly important to examine the quality of information shared by politicians. Here we show that from 2016 onward, members of the Republican party in the U.S. Congress have been increasingly sharing links to untrustworthy sources. The proportion of untrustworthy information posted by Republicans versus Democrats is diverging at an accelerating rate, and this divergence has worsened since president Biden was elected. This divergence between parties seems to be unique to the U.S. as it cannot be observed in other western democracies such as Germany and the United Kingdom, where left-right disparities are smaller and have remained largely constant.

Related papers

• Shifts in U.S. Social Media Use, 2020-2024: Decline, Fragmentation, and Enduring Polarization [0.0]
  This paper traces how the U.S. social media landscape has shifted across platforms, demographics, and politics.<n>Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter/X have lost ground, while TikTok and Reddit have grown modestly.<n>Political posting remains tightly linked to affective polarization, as the most partisan users are also the most active.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T11:37:16Z)
• Adapting Public Personas: A Multimodal Study of U.S. Legislators' Cross-Platform Social Media Strategies [2.604962834477529]
  This study examines how U.S. legislators strategically use social media platforms to adapt their public personas.<n>We find that legislators tailor their topics and stances to project distinct public personas on different platforms.<n>Democrats tend to prioritize TikTok, which has a younger user base, while Republicans are more likely to express stronger stances on established platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-12T22:21:39Z)
• Generative Memesis: AI Mediates Political Memes in the 2024 USA Presidential Election [1.4304078520604593]
  Using a dataset of 239,526 Instagram images, we examine the impact of different content types on user engagement during the 2024 US presidential Elections. Results show while synthetic content may not increase engagement alone, it mediates how political information is created through highly effective, often absurd, political memes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T17:35:05Z)
• Older Adults' Experiences with Misinformation on Social Media [3.4606760852212806]
  This study investigates how older adults in America discern, and contextualize social media misinformation. We found that 62% of the participants intending to vote Democrat saw a manipulative political purpose behind the spread of misinformation. During our interviews, we found that 63% of the participants who intended to vote Republican, were fully aware and acknowledged that Republican or conservative voices often time speak misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-14T21:34:59Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
  We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022. We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs. Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z)
• From alternative conceptions of honesty to alternative facts in communications by U.S. politicians [1.7292236187135732]
  We show that politicians' conception of honesty has undergone a distinct shift. An increase of belief-speaking of 10% is associated with a decrease of 12.8 points of quality. The results support the hypothesis that the current dissemination of misinformation is in part driven by an alternative understanding of truth and honesty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-23T08:59:32Z)
• Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
  We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections. Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections. 75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z)
• Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
  A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)
• Fringe News Networks: Dynamics of US News Viewership following the 2020 Presidential Election [22.116891169190886]
  Using data from before the November 3rd, 2020 US Presidential election, recent work has demonstrated the viability of using YouTube's social media ecosystem to obtain insights into the extent of US political polarization. This paper looks at the sharp transformation of the relationship between news consumers and here-to-fore "fringe" news media channels in the 64 days between the US presidential election and the violence that took place at US Capitol on January 6th.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-22T03:42:36Z)
• Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to misinformation [71.46564239895892]
  We analyze the relationship between partisanship, echo chambers, and vulnerability to online misinformation by studying news sharing behavior on Twitter. We find that vulnerability to misinformation is most strongly influenced by partisanship for both left- and right-leaning users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T01:36:14Z)
• Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking [54.23273310155137]
  We propose using the political diversity of a website's audience as a quality signal. Using news source reliability ratings from domain experts and web browsing data from a diverse sample of 6,890 U.S. citizens, we first show that websites with more extreme and less politically diverse audiences have lower journalistic standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T02:13:55Z)
• Neutral bots probe political bias on social media [7.41821251168122]
  We deploy neutral social bots who start following different news sources on Twitter to probe distinct biases emerging from platform mechanisms versus user interactions. We find no strong or consistent evidence of political bias in the news feed. The interactions of conservative accounts are skewed toward the right, whereas liberal accounts are exposed to moderate content shifting their experience toward the political center.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-17T01:20:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.