Older Adults' Experiences with Misinformation on Social Media

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.09354v1
• Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 21:34:59 GMT
• Title: Older Adults' Experiences with Misinformation on Social Media
• Abstract summary: This study investigates how older adults in America discern, and contextualize social media misinformation. We found that 62% of the participants intending to vote Democrat saw a manipulative political purpose behind the spread of misinformation. During our interviews, we found that 63% of the participants who intended to vote Republican, were fully aware and acknowledged that Republican or conservative voices often time speak misinformation.
• Score: 3.4606760852212806
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Older adults habitually encounter misinformation on social media, but there is little knowledge about their experiences with it. In this study, we combined a qualitative survey (n=119) with in-depth interviews (n=21) to investigate how older adults in America conceptualize, discern, and contextualize social media misinformation. As misinformation on social media in the past was driven towards influencing voting outcomes, we were particularly interested to approach our study from a voting intention perspective. We found that 62% of the participants intending to vote Democrat saw a manipulative political purpose behind the spread of misinformation while only 5% of those intending to vote Republican believed misinformation has a political dissent purpose. Regardless of the voting intentions, most participants relied on source heuristics combined with fact-checking to discern truth from misinformation on social media. The biggest concern about the misinformation, among all the participants, was that it increasingly leads to biased reasoning influenced by personal values and feelings instead of reasoning based on objective evidence. The participants intending to vote Democrat were in 74% of the cases concerned that misinformation will cause escalation of extremism in the future, while those intending to vote Republican, were undecided, or planned to abstain were concerned that misinformation will further erode the trust in democratic institutions, specifically in the context of public health and free and fair elections. During our interviews, we found that 63% of the participants who intended to vote Republican, were fully aware and acknowledged that Republican or conservative voices often time speak misinformation, even though they are closely aligned to their political ideology.

Related papers

• Characteristics of Political Misinformation Over the Past Decade [0.0]
  This paper uses natural language processing to find common characteristics of political misinformation over a twelve year period. The results show that misinformation has increased dramatically in recent years and that it has increasingly started to be shared from sources with primary information modalities of text and images. It was discovered that statements expressing misinformation contain more negative sentiment than accurate information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T09:12:39Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• From alternative conceptions of honesty to alternative facts in communications by U.S. politicians [1.7292236187135732]
  We show that politicians' conception of honesty has undergone a distinct shift. An increase of belief-speaking of 10% is associated with a decrease of 12.8 points of quality. The results support the hypothesis that the current dissemination of misinformation is in part driven by an alternative understanding of truth and honesty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-23T08:59:32Z)
• Folk Models of Misinformation on Social Media [10.667165962654996]
  We identify at least five folk models that conceptualize misinformation as either: political (counter)argumentation, out-of-context narratives, inherently fallacious information, external propaganda, or simply entertainment. We use the rich conceptualizations embodied in these folk models to uncover how social media users minimize adverse reactions to misinformation encounters in their everyday lives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-26T00:40:26Z)
• Social media sharing by political elites: An asymmetric American exceptionalism [1.7292236187135732]
  We show that from 2016 onward, members of the Republican party in the U.S. Congress have been increasingly sharing links to untrustworthy sources. The proportion of untrustworthy information posted by Republicans versus Democrats is diverging at an accelerating rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-13T16:03:47Z)
• Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
  We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation. We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z)
• Demographic Confounding Causes Extreme Instances of Lifestyle Politics on Facebook [73.37786708074361]
  We find that the most extreme instances of lifestyle politics are those which are highly confounded by demographics such as race/ethnicity. The most liberal interests included electric cars, Planned Parenthood, and liberal satire while the most conservative interests included the Republican Party and conservative commentators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-17T16:48:00Z)
• Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
  We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections. Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections. 75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to misinformation [71.46564239895892]
  We analyze the relationship between partisanship, echo chambers, and vulnerability to online misinformation by studying news sharing behavior on Twitter. We find that vulnerability to misinformation is most strongly influenced by partisanship for both left- and right-leaning users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T01:36:14Z)
• Social Media and Health Misinformation during the US COVID Crisis [0.0]
  Social media can play a role in limiting and refuting health misinformation. Using as a case study US President Donald Trump's controversial comments about the promise and power of UV light- and disinfectant-based treatments, this data memo examines how these comments were discussed and responded to on Twitter. We find that these comments fell into established politically partisan narratives and dominated discussion of both politics and COVID in the days following.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-12T12:42:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.