Exploring the Online Micro-targeting Practices of Small, Medium, and
Large Businesses
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.09286v2
- Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2024 18:18:43 GMT
- Title: Exploring the Online Micro-targeting Practices of Small, Medium, and
Large Businesses
- Authors: Salim Chouaki (1, 2, 3, 4), Islem Bouzenia (1, 2, 3, 4), Oana Goga (1,
2, 3, 4), Beatrice Roussillon (1, 5) ((1) Univ. Grenoble Alpes, (2) CNRS, (3)
Grenoble INP, (4) LIG, (5) GAEL)
- Abstract summary: The European Commission plans to restrict or ban some targeting functionalities in the new European Democracy Action Plan act.
We take a first step by understanding who is advertising on Facebook and how they use the targeting functionalities.
We found that only 32% of small and medium-sized businesses and 30% of large-sized businesses micro-target at least one of their ads.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Facebook and other advertising platforms exploit users data for marketing
purposes by allowing advertisers to select specific users and target them (the
practice is being called micro-targeting). However, advertisers such as
Cambridge Analytica have maliciously used these targeting features to
manipulate users in the context of elections. The European Commission plans to
restrict or ban some targeting functionalities in the new European Democracy
Action Plan act to protect users from such harms. The difficulty is that we do
not know the economic impact of these restrictions on regular advertisers. In
this paper, to inform the debate, we take a first step by understanding who is
advertising on Facebook and how they use the targeting functionalities. For
this, we asked 890 U.S. users to install a monitoring tool on their browsers to
collect the ads they receive on Facebook and information about how these ads
were targeted. By matching advertisers on Facebook with their LinkedIn
profiles, we could see that 71% of advertisers are small and medium-sized
businesses with 200 employees or less, and they are responsible for 61% of ads
and 57% of ad impressions. Regarding micro-targeting, we found that only 32% of
small and medium-sized businesses and 30% of large-sized businesses
micro-target at least one of their ads. These results should not be interpreted
as micro-targeting not being useful as a marketing strategy, but rather that
advertisers prefer to outsource the micro-targeting task to ad platforms.
Indeed, Facebook is employing optimization algorithms that exploit user data to
decide which users should see what ads; which means ad platforms are performing
an algorithmic-driven micro-targeting. Hence, when setting restrictions,
legislators should take into account both the traditional advertiser-driven
micro-targeting as well as algorithmic-driven micro-targeting performed by ad
platforms.
Related papers
- On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes.
Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z) - Why am I Still Seeing This: Measuring the Effectiveness Of Ad Controls and Explanations in AI-Mediated Ad Targeting Systems [55.02903075972816]
We evaluate the effectiveness of Meta's "See less" ad control and the actionability of ad targeting explanations following the shift to AI-mediated targeting.
We find that utilizing the "See less" ad control for the topics we study does not significantly reduce the number of ads shown by Meta on these topics.
We find that the majority of ad targeting explanations for local ads made no reference to location-specific targeting criteria.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-21T18:03:11Z) - Auditing for Racial Discrimination in the Delivery of Education Ads [50.37313459134418]
We propose a new third-party auditing method that can evaluate racial bias in the delivery of ads for education opportunities.
We find evidence of racial discrimination in Meta's algorithmic delivery of ads for education opportunities, posing legal and ethical concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-02T02:00:55Z) - Marketing to Children Through Online Targeted Advertising: Targeting
Mechanisms and Legal Aspects [1.1279808969568255]
On YouTube, advertisers can target their ads to users watching a particular video through placement-based targeting.
We show that placement-based targeting is possible on children-focused videos and enables marketing to children.
In addition, our ad experiments show that advertisers can use targeting based on profiling (e.g., interest, location, behavior) in combination with placement-based advertising on children-focused videos.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-06T09:10:39Z) - Discrimination through Image Selection by Job Advertisers on Facebook [79.21648699199648]
We propose and investigate the prevalence of a new means for discrimination in job advertising.
It combines both targeting and delivery -- through the disproportionate representation or exclusion of people of certain demographics in job ad images.
We use the Facebook Ad Library to demonstrate the prevalence of this practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-13T03:43:58Z) - Problematic Advertising and its Disparate Exposure on Facebook [15.667983888666312]
We study Facebook and investigate key gaps in our understanding of problematic online advertising.
We find that older people and minority groups are especially likely to be shown such ads.
Given that 22% of problematic ads had no specific targeting from advertisers, we infer that ad delivery algorithms played a significant role in the biased distribution of these ads.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T17:23:59Z) - Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job Ads [70.02478301291264]
We develop a new methodology for black-box auditing of algorithms for discrimination in the delivery of job advertisements.
Our first contribution is to identify the distinction between skew in ad delivery due to protected categories such as gender or race.
Second, we develop an auditing methodology that distinguishes between skew explainable by differences in qualifications from other factors.
Third, we apply our proposed methodology to two prominent targeted advertising platforms for job ads: Facebook and LinkedIn.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-09T17:38:36Z) - Do Interruptions Pay Off? Effects of Interruptive Ads on Consumers
Willingness to Pay [79.9312329825761]
We present the results of a study designed to measure the impact of interruptive advertising on consumers willingness to pay for products bearing the advertiser's brand.
Our results contribute to the research on the economic impact of advertising, and introduce a method of measuring actual (as opposed to self-reported) willingness to pay in experimental marketing research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-14T09:26:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.