Alleviating Search Bias in Bayesian Evolutionary Optimization with Many Heterogeneous Objectives

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.12217v1
• Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 17:07:40 GMT
• Title: Alleviating Search Bias in Bayesian Evolutionary Optimization with Many Heterogeneous Objectives
• Authors: Xilu Wang, Yaochu Jin, Sebastian Schmitt, Markus Olhofer
• Abstract summary: We deal with multi-objective optimization problems with heterogeneous objectives (HE-MOPs) A new acquisition function that mitigates search bias towards the fast objectives is suggested. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm by testing it on widely used multi-/many-objective benchmark problems.
• Score: 9.139734850798124
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multi-objective optimization problems whose objectives have different evaluation costs are commonly seen in the real world. Such problems are now known as multi-objective optimization problems with heterogeneous objectives (HE-MOPs). So far, however, only a few studies have been reported to address HE-MOPs, and most of them focus on bi-objective problems with one fast objective and one slow objective. In this work, we aim to deal with HE-MOPs having more than two black-box and heterogeneous objectives. To this end, we develop a multi-objective Bayesian evolutionary optimization approach to HE-MOPs by exploiting the different data sets on the cheap and expensive objectives in HE-MOPs to alleviate the search bias caused by the heterogeneous evaluation costs for evaluating different objectives. To make the best use of two different training data sets, one with solutions evaluated on all objectives and the other with those only evaluated on the fast objectives, two separate Gaussian process models are constructed. In addition, a new acquisition function that mitigates search bias towards the fast objectives is suggested, thereby achieving a balance between convergence and diversity. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm by testing it on widely used multi-/many-objective benchmark problems whose objectives are assumed to be heterogeneously expensive.

Related papers

• Maintaining Diversity Provably Helps in Evolutionary Multimodal Optimization [20.621635722585502]
  We show that a simple method that considers diversity of solutions in the solution space can benefit the search in evolutionary algorithms (EAs) We prove that the proposed method, working with crossover, can help enhance the exploration, leading to multimodal or even exponential acceleration on the expected running time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T17:52:14Z)
• Many-Objective Multi-Solution Transport [36.07360460509921]
  Many-objective multi-solution Transport (MosT) is a framework that finds multiple diverse solutions in the Pareto front of many objectives. MosT formulates the problem as a bi-level optimization of weighted objectives for each solution, where the weights are defined by an optimal transport between the objectives and solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T23:03:12Z)
• Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignment [103.12563033438715]
  Alignment in artificial intelligence pursues consistency between model responses and human preferences as well as values. Existing alignment techniques are mostly unidirectional, leading to suboptimal trade-offs and poor flexibility over various objectives. We introduce controllable preference optimization (CPO), which explicitly specifies preference scores for different objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T12:12:30Z)
• Multi-Target Multiplicity: Flexibility and Fairness in Target Specification under Resource Constraints [76.84999501420938]
  We introduce a conceptual and computational framework for assessing how the choice of target affects individuals' outcomes. We show that the level of multiplicity that stems from target variable choice can be greater than that stemming from nearly-optimal models of a single target.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T18:57:14Z)
• A Scale-Independent Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning with Convergence Analysis [0.6091702876917281]
  Many sequential decision-making problems need optimization of different objectives which possibly conflict with each other. We develop a single-agent scale-independent multi-objective reinforcement learning on the basis of the Advantage Actor-Critic (A2C) algorithm. A convergence analysis is then done for the devised multi-objective algorithm providing a convergence-in-mean guarantee.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T16:38:55Z)
• Multi-Objective GFlowNets [59.16787189214784]
  We study the problem of generating diverse candidates in the context of Multi-Objective Optimization. In many applications of machine learning such as drug discovery and material design, the goal is to generate candidates which simultaneously optimize a set of potentially conflicting objectives. We propose Multi-Objective GFlowNets (MOGFNs), a novel method for generating diverse optimal solutions, based on GFlowNets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T16:15:36Z)
• AcroFOD: An Adaptive Method for Cross-domain Few-shot Object Detection [59.10314662986463]
  Cross-domain few-shot object detection aims to adapt object detectors in the target domain with a few annotated target data. The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-22T10:23:40Z)
• Multi-Objective Quality Diversity Optimization [2.4608515808275455]
  We propose an extension of the MAP-Elites algorithm in the multi-objective setting: Multi-Objective MAP-Elites (MOME) Namely, it combines the diversity inherited from the MAP-Elites grid algorithm with the strength of multi-objective optimizations. We evaluate our method on several tasks, from standard optimization problems to robotics simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T10:48:28Z)
• A survey on multi-objective hyperparameter optimization algorithms for Machine Learning [62.997667081978825]
  This article presents a systematic survey of the literature published between 2014 and 2020 on multi-objective HPO algorithms. We distinguish between metaheuristic-based algorithms, metamodel-based algorithms, and approaches using a mixture of both. We also discuss the quality metrics used to compare multi-objective HPO procedures and present future research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-23T10:22:30Z)
• Many Objective Bayesian Optimization [0.0]
  Multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MOBO) is a set of methods that has been successfully applied for the simultaneous optimization of black-boxes. In particular, MOBO methods have problems when the number of objectives in a multi-objective optimization problem are 3 or more, which is the many objective setting. We show empirical evidence in a set of toy, synthetic, benchmark and real experiments that GPs predictive distributions of the effectiveness of the metric and the algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-08T21:57:07Z)
• Provable Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning with Generative Models [98.19879408649848]
  We study the problem of single policy MORL, which learns an optimal policy given the preference of objectives. Existing methods require strong assumptions such as exact knowledge of the multi-objective decision process. We propose a new algorithm called model-based envelop value (EVI) which generalizes the enveloped multi-objective $Q$-learning algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-19T22:35:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.