Can the observer know the state of Schrodinger's cat without opening the
box?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.13225v1
- Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 14:30:36 GMT
- Title: Can the observer know the state of Schrodinger's cat without opening the
box?
- Authors: Lizhi Xin, Houwen Xin
- Abstract summary: We propose a quantum expected value theory for decision-making under uncertainty.
Value operator is proposed to guide observers to choose corresponding actions based on their subjective beliefs.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: In order to know if the Schrodinger's cat is alive or dead without opening
the box, observers have to play a game with nature. The observers have to
"guess" (with degrees of belief) the state of the cat due to incomplete
information; in other words, the observers' decision has to be made under
uncertainty. We propose a quantum expected value theory for decision-making
under uncertainty. Value operator is proposed to guide observers to choose
corresponding actions based on their subjective beliefs through objective
quantum world by maximizing the value from the measured historical results. The
value operator, as a quantum decision tree, can be constructed from both
quantum gates and logic operations. Genetic programming is applied to optimize
quantum decision trees.
Related papers
- A no-go result on observing quantum superpositions [0.0]
We give a general proof showing that once irreversible processes are involved, a class of projective measurements is impossible.
Applying this no-go result to the Schroedinger's cat paradox implies that if something is claimed to be a real Schroedinger's cat, there will be no measurable difference between it and a trivial classical mixture of ordinary cats.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-06T19:22:26Z) - Schr\"odinger cat states of a 16-microgram mechanical oscillator [54.35850218188371]
The superposition principle is one of the most fundamental principles of quantum mechanics.
Here we demonstrate the preparation of a mechanical resonator with an effective mass of 16.2 micrograms in Schr"odinger cat states of motion.
We show control over the size and phase of the superposition and investigate the decoherence dynamics of these states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-01T13:29:44Z) - Quantum measurement: a game between observer and nature? [0.0]
We propose a quantum decision theory approach to explain the role of the observer in quantum measurements.
We believe observers build up their experience of the external world by playing games with nature, and then "decode" the nature based on their experiences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-30T07:57:58Z) - Schroedinger cats and quantum complementarity [0.0]
Complementarity tells us we cannot know precisely the values of all the properties of a quantum object at the same time.
We show that a Schroedinger cat has a well defined value of a property that is complementary to its being dead or alive'' property.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-03T17:00:42Z) - Decision-making under uncertainty: a quantum value operator approach [0.0]
We propose a quantum expected value theory for decision-making under uncertainty.
Value operator guides people to choose corresponding actions based on their subjective beliefs through objective world.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-10T15:25:07Z) - Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory.
We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z) - About the description of physical reality of Bell's experiment [91.3755431537592]
A hidden variables model complying with the simplest form of Local Realism was recently introduced.
It reproduces Quantum Mechanics' predictions for an even ideally perfect Bell's experiment.
A new type of quantum computer does not exist yet, not even in theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-06T15:55:13Z) - Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same.
Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles.
We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z) - Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world.
We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z) - Why the Future Cannot be Open in the Quantum World [0.0]
An open future means that the value observed when measuring a physical quantity in the future is not determined.
Many interpretations regard quantum mechanics as deterministic.
I argue that, although quantum mechanics cannot predict the future with certainty, the quantum mechanical world must be deterministic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-06T07:06:32Z) - Secure Two-Party Quantum Computation Over Classical Channels [63.97763079214294]
We consider the setting where the two parties (a classical Alice and a quantum Bob) can communicate only via a classical channel.
We show that it is in general impossible to realize a two-party quantum functionality with black-box simulation in the case of malicious quantum adversaries.
We provide a compiler that takes as input a classical proof of quantum knowledge (PoQK) protocol for a QMA relation R and outputs a zero-knowledge PoQK for R that can be verified by classical parties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-15T17:55:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.