Schroedinger cats and quantum complementarity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01083v2
• Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 16:04:18 GMT
• Title: Schroedinger cats and quantum complementarity
• Authors: Lorenzo Maccone
• Abstract summary: Complementarity tells us we cannot know precisely the values of all the properties of a quantum object at the same time. We show that a Schroedinger cat has a well defined value of a property that is complementary to its being dead or alive'' property.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Complementarity tells us we cannot know precisely the values of all the properties of a quantum object at the same time: the precise determination of one property implies that the value of some other (complementary) property is undefined. E.g.the precise knowledge of the position of a particle implies that its momentum is undefined. Here we show that a Schroedinger cat has a well defined value of a property that is complementary to its ``being dead or alive'' property. Then, thanks to complementarity, it has an undefined value of the property ``being dead or alive''. In other words, the cat paradox is explained through quantum complementarity: of its many complementary properties, any quantum system, such as a cat, can have a well defined value only of one at a time. Schroedinger's cat has a definite value of a property which is complementary to ``being dead or alive'', so it is neither dead nor alive. Figuratively one can say it is both dead and alive. While this interpretation only uses textbook concepts (the Copenhagen interpretation), apparently it has never explicitly appeared in the literature. We detail how to build an Arduino based simulation of Schroedinger's experiment based on these concepts for science outreach events.

Related papers

• Against (unitary) interpretation (of quantum mechanics): removing the metaphysical load [0.0]
  We show that "unitary quantum mechanics", which according to its followers leads to some interesting paradoxes, is an interpretation of quantum mechanics. The root of "unitary" vs. operational discrepancy is that the latter treats the measurement process as irreversible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T16:19:44Z)
• A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
  We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device. Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z)
• A no-go result on observing quantum superpositions [0.0]
  We give a general proof showing that once irreversible processes are involved, a class of projective measurements is impossible. Applying this no-go result to the Schroedinger's cat paradox implies that if something is claimed to be a real Schroedinger's cat, there will be no measurable difference between it and a trivial classical mixture of ordinary cats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T19:22:26Z)
• Experimental demonstration of separating the waveparticle duality of a single photon with the quantum Cheshire cat [18.728749435511805]
  We experimentally separated the wave and particle attributes of a single photon by exploiting the quantum Cheshire cat concept. By applying a weak disturbance to the evolution of the system, we achieve an effect similar to the quantum Cheshire cat.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T11:35:01Z)
• Schr\"odinger cat states of a 16-microgram mechanical oscillator [54.35850218188371]
  The superposition principle is one of the most fundamental principles of quantum mechanics. Here we demonstrate the preparation of a mechanical resonator with an effective mass of 16.2 micrograms in Schr"odinger cat states of motion. We show control over the size and phase of the superposition and investigate the decoherence dynamics of these states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-01T13:29:44Z)
• Is Schr\"odinger's Cat Alive? [0.0]
  Erwin Schr"odinger is famous for presenting his wave equation of motion that jump-started quantum mechanics. His disenchantment with the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics led him to unveil the Schr"odinger's cat paradox.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T07:47:02Z)
• Can the observer know the state of Schrodinger's cat without opening the box? [0.0]
  We propose a quantum expected value theory for decision-making under uncertainty. Value operator is proposed to guide observers to choose corresponding actions based on their subjective beliefs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-28T14:30:36Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• About the description of physical reality of Bell's experiment [91.3755431537592]
  A hidden variables model complying with the simplest form of Local Realism was recently introduced. It reproduces Quantum Mechanics' predictions for an even ideally perfect Bell's experiment. A new type of quantum computer does not exist yet, not even in theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T15:55:13Z)
• The Schr\"{o}dinger Cat: Physics, Myth, and Philosophy [0.0]
  The parable of the cat has provoked and enlivened debates on the meaning of the quantum theory. I will discuss these issues of the quantum theory focussing on various aspects of the metaphor of the Schr"odinger cat.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-20T10:40:58Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.