Research Paper Recommender System by Considering Users' Information Seeking Behaviors

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02377v1
• Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 08:11:58 GMT
• Title: Research Paper Recommender System by Considering Users' Information Seeking Behaviors
• Authors: Zhelin Xu, Shuhei Yamamoto, Hideo Joho,
• Abstract summary: One of the leading approaches to paper recommendation is content-based filtering method.<n>We propose a content-based filtering recommendation method that takes this information seeking behavior into account.
• Score: 0.8588898349347149
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: With the rapid growth of scientific publications, researchers need to spend more time and effort searching for papers that align with their research interests. To address this challenge, paper recommendation systems have been developed to help researchers in effectively identifying relevant paper. One of the leading approaches to paper recommendation is content-based filtering method. Traditional content-based filtering methods recommend relevant papers to users based on the overall similarity of papers. However, these approaches do not take into account the information seeking behaviors that users commonly employ when searching for literature. Such behaviors include not only evaluating the overall similarity among papers, but also focusing on specific sections, such as the method section, to ensure that the approach aligns with the user's interests. In this paper, we propose a content-based filtering recommendation method that takes this information seeking behavior into account. Specifically, in addition to considering the overall content of a paper, our approach also takes into account three specific sections (background, method, and results) and assigns weights to them to better reflect user preferences. We conduct offline evaluations on the publicly available DBLP dataset, and the results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms six baseline methods in terms of precision, recall, F1-score, MRR, and MAP.

Related papers

• Online and Offline Evaluations of Collaborative Filtering and Content Based Recommender Systems [0.0]
  This study provides a comparative analysis of a large-scale recommender system operating in Iran. The system employs user-based and item-based recommendations using content-based, collaborative filtering, trend-based methods, and hybrid approaches. Our methods of evaluation include manual evaluation, offline tests including accuracy and ranking metrics like hit-rate@k and nDCG, and online tests consisting of click-through rate (CTR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T20:05:31Z)
• An Efficient Multi-threaded Collaborative Filtering Approach in Recommendation System [0.0]
  This research focuses on building a scalable recommendation system capable of handling numerous users efficiently. A multithreaded similarity approach is employed to achieve this, where users are divided into independent threads that run in parallel. This parallelization significantly reduces computation time compared to traditional methods, resulting in a faster, more efficient, and scalable recommendation system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-28T06:33:18Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Retrieval Methods in Recommender Systems [32.1847120460637]
  This survey explores the critical yet often overlooked retrieval stage of recommender systems. To achieve precise and efficient personalized retrieval, we summarize existing work in three key areas. We highlight current industrial applications through a case study on retrieval practices at a specific company.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T07:09:59Z)
• Generating Natural Language Queries for More Effective Systematic Review Screening Prioritisation [53.77226503675752]
  The current state of the art uses the final title of the review as a query to rank the documents using BERT-based neural rankers. In this paper, we explore alternative sources of queries for prioritising screening, such as the Boolean query used to retrieve the documents to be screened and queries generated by instruction-based large-scale language models such as ChatGPT and Alpaca. Our best approach is not only viable based on the information available at the time of screening, but also has similar effectiveness to the final title.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-11T05:12:14Z)
• Impression-Aware Recommender Systems [53.48892326556546]
  We present a systematic literature review on recommender systems using impressions.<n>We define a theoretical framework to delimit recommender systems using impressions and a novel paradigm for personalized recommendations, called impression-aware recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T16:16:02Z)
• A Gold Standard Dataset for the Reviewer Assignment Problem [117.59690218507565]
  "Similarity score" is a numerical estimate of the expertise of a reviewer in reviewing a paper. Our dataset consists of 477 self-reported expertise scores provided by 58 researchers. For the task of ordering two papers in terms of their relevance for a reviewer, the error rates range from 12%-30% in easy cases to 36%-43% in hard cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T16:15:03Z)
• Tag-Aware Document Representation for Research Paper Recommendation [68.8204255655161]
  We propose a hybrid approach that leverages deep semantic representation of research papers based on social tags assigned by users. The proposed model is effective in recommending research papers even when the rating data is very sparse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T09:13:07Z)
• A Dataset on Malicious Paper Bidding in Peer Review [84.68308372858755]
  Malicious reviewers strategically bid in order to unethically manipulate the paper assignment. A critical impediment towards creating and evaluating methods to mitigate this issue is the lack of publicly-available data on malicious paper bidding. We release a novel dataset, collected from a mock conference activity where participants were instructed to bid either honestly or maliciously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-24T20:23:33Z)
• Enhancing Reading Strategies by Exploring A Theme-based Approach to Literature Surveys [5.004814662623872]
  We have designed a methodology that allows users to visually and thematically explore corpora, while developing personalised holistic reading strategies. Using in-depth semi-structured interviews and stimulated recall, we found that users: (i) selected papers that they otherwise would not have read, (ii) developed a more coherent reading strategy, and (iii) understood the thematic structure and relationships between papers more effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-10T10:36:45Z)
• Deep Learning feature selection to unhide demographic recommender systems factors [63.732639864601914]
  The matrix factorization model generates factors which do not incorporate semantic knowledge. DeepUnHide is able to extract demographic information from the users and items factors in collaborative filtering recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T17:36:48Z)
• A Survey on Knowledge Graph-Based Recommender Systems [65.50486149662564]
  We conduct a systematical survey of knowledge graph-based recommender systems. We focus on how the papers utilize the knowledge graph for accurate and explainable recommendation. We introduce datasets used in these works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-28T02:26:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.